Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Windows XP issues"
2020 Aug 24
1
Windows XP issues
Thanks Andrew for the answer.
But even if I enable Windows XP to use NTLMv2 (using Regedit on
(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/CURRENTCONTROLSET/CONTROL/LSA
LMCOMPATIBILITYLEVEL to 5) and adding "ntlm auth = ntlmv1-permitted" to my
smb.conf
Still the same error. (No *more connections can* be *made* to this remote
computer at this time) in versions higher than 4.10.
Any ideas?
Best Regards
2020 Nov 09
3
Running Samba-tool on remote host
Hi Samba team.
I was thinking of running samba-tool for creating users and changing
passwords on a remote host.
Looking for info on google I find the directive "samba-tool --ipaddress ""
" where you can send info to a remote host.
But I installed samba 4.12.9 on CentOS 8, and when I run samba-tool
--ipaddress the cli says option not found.
Any ideas?
Greetings from
2020 Aug 21
0
Windows XP issues
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 19:38 -0300, Franco Suarez via samba wrote:
> HI to all!
>
> My Name is Juan Franco. I'm from Argentina, I work in a big gubernamental
> organization and we are migrating our deprecated (smb3 + Ldap + NT4) to
> Samba 4 AD DC:
>
> But I have some issues with newer versions. if I install a version newer to
> 4.9.x. Windows XP can't join the
2017 Nov 20
2
Samba4 server is not accessible for logon from Windows 2008R2 SP1.
I discovered the situation.
When attempting to logon from Windows 2008R2 to Samba4 is made we can see
in Samba smbd log the following important for understanding the situation
lines:
[2017/11/20 13:25:52.040094, 2, pid=7100, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
../libcli/auth/ntlm_check.c:430(ntlm_password_check)
ntlm_password_check: NTLMv1 passwords NOT PERMITTED for user <username>
[2017/11/20
2015 Feb 25
2
Error 64 connecting from WIndows 7
Hi all,
I'm running Samba 4.1.6 with Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS on a Power 8 box.
Here is my smb.conf file:
[global]
client lanman auth = yes
client ntlmv2 auth = no
lanman auth = yes
netbios name = myName
map untrusted to domain = yes
log level = 3
[myshare]
path = /home/myuser/myshare
available = yes
valid users = myuser
read only = no
browseable = yes
public = yes
writable = yes
When I try to
2020 Oct 13
2
Samba Sysvol and GPO Issues
Hi Rowland.
I'm using CentOS 8.2.2004
The Samba is compiled from sources, it's the only DC and I'm not using it
as a fileserver.
# Global parameters
[global]
dns forwarder = 10.30.251.70
netbios name = SAMBA4-01
realm = LARRY.LAN
server role = active directory domain controller
workgroup = LARRY
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
[sysvol]
2020 Oct 13
2
Samba Sysvol and GPO Issues
Hi Samba Team!
It's me again I'm having some issues with gpo's and sysvol access.
I've installed samba 4.12.7. using idmap_ldb:use rfc2307
When I tried to create a gpo using the rsat tools I got a Permission Denied
error.
Among other things, I have run:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
Also I added to smb.conf
acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes
in sysvol and netlogon sections.
I
2005 Jun 07
2
Multiple E1s on one box
Hello all,
Has anyone tried 8xE1 in one box using Asterisk and Digium boards ?
What is the CPU needed for sustained performance in this capacity ?
Is this affected if G.729 codec is used ?
Regards,
Jorge A.
2020 Oct 13
1
Samba Sysvol and GPO Issues
Selinux is disabled.
I don't know.
The GUID and UID in sysvol directories are numbers like 3000004:30000010.
Is it normal?
Thanks!
El mar., 13 oct. 2020 a las 16:10, Rowland penny via samba (<
samba at lists.samba.org>) escribi?:
> On 13/10/2020 19:57, Franco Suarez wrote:
> > Hi Rowland.
> >
> > I'm using CentOS 8.2.2004
> >
> > The Samba is
2020 Jun 25
2
ntlm
Hello experts/users,
We have a samba server in ubuntu 18.04 LTS with version.
apt-cache policy samba
samba:
Installed: 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.16
Candidate: 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.16
All is fine and great. Except one (internet disabled) windows 7
professional PC (sorry we still need to run it for a scientific tool)
cannot connect unless I put "ntlm auth = yes" in
2001 Dec 22
3
NTLM, NTLMv2, lmcompatibilitylevel >=2 doesnt work
Hi,
I'm wondering if samba supports NTLMv2, particullary NTLMv2 session security.
But I can't even get NTLM-only to work :(.
I'm trying to increase lmcompatibilitylevel, but I can't connect to the samba server
anymore when I set it to 2 or higher ("Send NTLM authenication only").
I'm using HEAD CVS of today, and my smb.conf looks like this:
[global]
2007 Sep 25
2
Stumbling blocks moving to NTLMv2
Hi folks,
I have been asked to force NTLMv2 logins to avoid use of LM hashes.
To meet the requirement I added some lines to the smb.conf in [Global] (we
only have that section anyway - this is purely for domain authentication
with an ldap backend):
client lanman auth = no
client NTLMv2 auth = yes
lanman auth = no
min protocol = LANMAN2
ntlm auth = no
This seemed to work - users
2017 Oct 14
3
Do Unix extensions still work with SMB3?
Hi all,
Quick question - does Samba server still support Unix extensions when
connecting over SMB3?
My Linux client recently got upgraded to a CIFS module version that uses
SMB3 by default, and since then I lost the ability to create symlinks
on my CIFS shares. Running "mount" shows the share mounted with the
"nounix" option. If I follow the advice in dmesg and add the
2019 Apr 30
4
Windows clients require reboot once a day in order to access mapped drives
Hai,
...
>
> As I said, where is the fault, is it something that Windows 10 is or
> isn't doing, or is it Samba ?
>
> Well, we cannot change Windows, so on that basis, I think you should
> make a Samba bug report and let it work through the system.
>
> Rowland
Well, yes, we can change windows, by allowing/disallowing SMB1.
Which might help in detecting whats
2018 Nov 21
2
Samba4 shares slow
Hi there
I set up a POC domain with multiple DCs, multiple remote sites and samba
shares. This POC is a simulation of a whole samba3 domain migration.
Users, and groups have been imported from the older domain to the new one.
Here's the setup:
("Remote sites" are actually different subnets on the same location for
the POC)
*Main Site*:
DC1 (RHEL7 - samba 4.6.4)
DC2 (RHEL7 -
2017 May 17
1
browsing problem with minimum protocol SMB2
I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the
recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below
protocols.
However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access
properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in
order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client:
smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2
Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]
2004 Mar 02
1
Samba 3 and NTLMv2 support
Hi:
I have Samba 3.0.2a running on Fedora Core 1. This server is set to be
Domain PDC and I am looking to have clients attach to it NTLMv2 only.
After looking over the man page for smb.conf, I have set the two options
that I thought would accomplish:
[Global]
lanman auth = no
ntlm auth = no
On the workstation side, I have set
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\lmcompatibilitylevel
2018 Oct 16
4
Problema de memoria de R
Buenas tardes,
Solicito por favor ayuda con este error:
Error: OutOfMemoryError (Java): Java heap space
Estoy trabajando con matrices de grandes dimensiones y el programa no logra completarse porque dice le falta memoria.
Gracias
[unnamed]
Sara Suarez Zapata
Estudiante en práctica - Unidad Gestion Bolsa de Energia.
Tel: (574) 380 61 18
Correo: sara.suarez en
2017 Sep 27
1
[Announce] Samba 4.6.8, 4.5.14 and 4.4.16 Security Releases Available
Hi Team,
Workaround for
CVE-2017-12151 :- client max protocol = NT1 and
CVE-2017-12163 :- server min protocol = SMB2_02
are contradicting to each other.
CVE-2017-12151 impacts on SMB3 protocol but workaound suggst to use NT1.
I have below queries regarding this.
Is SMB2 protocol also impacted by CVE-2017-12151 ?
Can i use client max protocol = SMB2 so that it does not contradict with
2018 Dec 03
2
Samba 4.9.3 and the "10 hour problem"
Hmm…
I see that there is a patch in the bugzilla page for that bug. I guess I could try that one… :-)
I notice in the patch that there is a lot of talk about SMB2 - we use SMB3 mostly now. But perhaps there is some code sharing? Or perhaps SMB2 is used when talking to the AD servers? Or the few SMB2-talking clients causes the problem for all of the other users? When testing the “timeout” issue I