similar to: Naming violation: objectClass: myObjectClass not a valid child class for <>

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:57:05 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 09:43, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > > 64 Naming violation: objectClass: myObjectClass not a valid child class for <OU=myOrganizationUnit,DC=domain,DC=local> > > Could someone give me an hint on why such an error could occur? > > Please post the ldif you are trying

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:06:03 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 10:58, RhineDevil wrote: > > You said you didn't want to help me about this but if you'd do at least I'd learn something useful for custom schemas, since this type of error isn't referenced anywhere > > No, I said I wouldn't help you shoot yourself in the

How could I migrate these fields to CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=local? dn: cn=abuse,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local cn: abuse objectClass: nisMailAlias objectClass: top rfc822MailMember: root dn: cn=noc,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local cn: noc objectClass: nisMailAlias objectClass: top rfc822MailMember: root dn: cn=security,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local cn:

Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:56:57 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 20/07/2020 11:11, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > > How could I migrate these fields to CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=local? > > > > dn: cn=abuse,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local > > cn: abuse > > objectClass: nisMailAlias > > objectClass:

On 26/07/2020 10:58, RhineDevil wrote: > You said you didn't want to help me about this but if you'd do at least I'd learn something useful for custom schemas, since this type of error isn't referenced anywhere No, I said I wouldn't help you shoot yourself in the foot, this isn't shooting anything ;-) Create two ldif files: /tmp/class.ldif dn:

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: > > > > Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif > > > > (I used ldbadd instead of ldbmodify, is that a problem?) > > No, that isn't the problem, the problem is that I forgot to remove a > comment :-( > >

Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > > Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: > >>> Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif > >>> > >>> (I

My ldap config is using the variable %d in base search for domain replacement when dovecot will search for users in LDAP. Its works fine for dovecot operation. But, for doveadm index, not. It ignores that variable and tries to pass a base search without domain. So, the search will not working. This is the command: # doveadm -v index -A INBOX This is my config: # cat

On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: >>> Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif >>> >>> (I used ldbadd instead of ldbmodify, is that a problem?) >> No, that isn't the problem, the problem is that I

On 11/10/2020 11:06, RhineDevil wrote: > Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: >>> Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>>> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: >>>>> Done, I still get the same errors when

Sun, 11 Oct 2020 16:07:31 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 11/10/2020 11:06, RhineDevil wrote: > > Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > >>> Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >

I added misc.schema to samba LDAP implementation, then I tried to insert this: dn: CN=security,CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=mydomain,DC=mytld cn: security objectClass: nisMailAlias objectClass: top rfc822MailMember: root I got this error: https://0bin.net/paste/Xhhierl5ZAh6QVVJ#ZNXk9+hWY70PLof1eZ1TaqIoO-v3gRGOqNnIpfnX9GI How could I solve? -------------- next part

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > If an ldap lookup works on every DC, except for one and the data is > definitely there on the one DC it doesn't work on, then it must be > something on that DC. is there a firewall or apparmor/selinux in the > way ? No. Anyway, note that query return correctly 'result: 0 Success', simply return no data. Another

Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:10:15 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 22/07/2020 13:53, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > > I added misc.schema to samba LDAP implementation, then I tried to insert this: > > > > dn: CN=security,CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=mydomain,DC=mytld > > cn: security > > objectClass:

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > No. Anyway, note that query return correctly 'result: 0 Success', > > simply return no data. > That just means the search retuned without error Eh. Query succeded and return no data. Yes. > If you run the command: > ldapsearch -H ldap://vdcpp1.ad.fvg.lnf.it -W -D >

On 20/07/2020 11:11, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > How could I migrate these fields to CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=local? > > dn: cn=abuse,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local > cn: abuse > objectClass: nisMailAlias > objectClass: top > rfc822MailMember: root > > dn: cn=noc,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local > cn: noc > objectClass:

On 20/07/2020 17:52, RhineDevil wrote: > Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:56:57 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> On 20/07/2020 11:11, RhineDevil via samba wrote: >>> How could I migrate these fields to CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=local? >>> >>> dn: cn=abuse,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local >>> cn: abuse

Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:24:15 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 20/07/2020 17:52, RhineDevil wrote: > > Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:56:57 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 20/07/2020 11:11, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > >>> How could I migrate these fields to

> Why?! Sorry but... someone can point me in the right direction? Really i don't know how to look for that problem... I summarize: a) an LDAP lookup for some data works in ALL DC past one b) in that non-working DC, a direct query against the sam.ldb reveal that data are here (so, seems to me an ACL problem) c) checking sync status between DCs reveal no sync troubles. Where i can

On 15/09/2019 19:08, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: > W dniu 2019-09-15 o?18:32, Rowland penny via samba pisze: >> On 15/09/2019 16:44, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: >>> I have some questions: >>> >>> I not currently understood - bind9 connected to AD server must be >>> used by the LAN workstations - or only via AD server? >>>