similar to: krb5_kt_start_seq_get failed (Permission denied)

Try this : #source: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/1484262 Add in /etc/krb5.conf in [libdefaults] ignore_k5login = true Did it help? If (as in my case) root is not allowed in the user homdirs it can validateon $HOME/.k5login Above fixed it for me. I only cant tell based on the config if this applies to you. Its a simple thing to try. Greetz, Louis

On 16/07/2020 22:13, Yakov Revyakin wrote: > Thank you! I have food for tomorrow. Now I only want to voice some of > my considerations. > > Imagine that a domain had no trusts. At this time a PC became a member > of this domain. > After some time DC made trust with another domain. In this case > existing members don't consider?any extra configuration like adding >

Hi Rowland, Thank you for effort My output as you requested: ## Samba DC d at us-smdc3:~$ wbinfo --online-status BUILTIN : active connection SVITLA3 : active connection APEX : active connection ## Linux Client d at uc-sm18:~$ wbinfo --online-status BUILTIN : online UC-SM18 : online SVITLA3 : online APEX : online # UC-SM18 is a Linux member of SVITLA3. You decided to demonstrate too difficult

Point #1: is not correct. Why is Jake getting an ID from * Range and not APEX range. ? That need to be found first Run: net cache flush Restart samba. : systemctl restart smbd winbind nmbd (and/or sssd is you use that) wbinfo --all-domains -ug id jake getent passwd jake Any improvement? > if you have set: APEX:backend = ad Yes, and did you assign an UID/GID after you changed RID to

Some more details. Below is what I have during joining Linux (Ubuntu 20.04) to the SVITLA3 domain. SVITLA3 (Samba) is trusting, APEX (AD) is trusted. SVITLA3 has *administrator *and *test01 *users, APEX has *administrator *and *jake *users. test01 - 20000:20000 (uidNumber:gidNumber) jake - 10000:10000 You can see some delay in some places - I marked them bold. It looks like DNS timeouts. The

Hi friends, I have a one way outgoing trust between SAMBA trusting domain and AD trusted domain. SSH Authentication of a user belonging to the SAMBA domain works properly on a Linux computer which is a member of SAMBA domain. I would like to authenticate a trusted user from the AD domain on the same Linux computer with SSH. Currently it doesn't work. I am able to authenticate trusted accounts

Hai, ? Sorry for the late(r) reply but we all need to sleep also sometimes.? ;-) note, i saw its fixed, but i'll do comment a bit through your replies. ? ? mainly because of this part ? this part.? (Sended: monday 13 juli 2020 18:51) > net ads join -U administrator at SVITLA3.ROOM > Enter administrator at SVITLA3.ROOM's password: > Using short domain name -- SVITLA3 >

Currently I have the following empirical knowledge about outgoing trust: - In case of creating this type of trust using direction=both we get outgoing trust working partially - it is possible to login to Windows member of trusting domain with trusted credentials as well as access shares on trusted side further. It is impossible to make the same login on Linux members. - In case of making the same

> > Hi friends, > I need your help. > > I implemented > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_Smart_Card_Login > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/windows-security/enabling-smart-card-logon-third-party-certification-authorities > enabling smart card logon on a Windows Server 2016 as a domain member of > Samba DC. > > Currently I

On 21/07/2020 15:38, Yakov Revyakin wrote: > Hi Rowland, > Thank you for effort > > My output as you requested: > ## Samba DC > d at us-smdc3:~$ wbinfo --online-status > BUILTIN : active connection > SVITLA3 : active connection > APEX : active connection > > ## Linux Client > d at uc-sm18:~$ wbinfo --online-status > BUILTIN : online > UC-SM18 : online >

Louis, could you take a look on my case again? I am not sure that the problem is in incorrect groups. Only trusted credentials don't work. Have you any idea what the reason is? On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:50, Yakov Revyakin <yrevyakin at gmail.com> wrote: > Some more details. Below is what I have during joining Linux (Ubuntu > 20.04) to the SVITLA3 domain. SVITLA3 (Samba) is

On 16/07/2020 16:11, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > First of all, why does the DOMAIN contains/shows a dot in it. > ( i think its a wrong setting in sssd, but i dont know sssd ) > I know this is one of your REALMs and not the domain. > > > Now your lines : > Works Yes: Jul 16 11:23:48 uc-sssdlbox20 sshd[2048]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0

What you need is to add the windows group in ssh to allowedgroups And give that windows group a GID. You "cant" add a linux user into the windows group, but you can add a windows user (if it has UID/GID) Into the linux group. I separeted that, to there is always ssh access available. I use the following : AllowGroups lin-allow-ssh win-allow-ssh Windows users in win-allow-ssh Linux

Hai, I dont use trusts myself, this is what i see. Lets take small steps here. First of all, why does the DOMAIN contains/shows a dot in it. ( i think its a wrong setting in sssd, but i dont know sssd ) I know this is one of your REALMs and not the domain. I refer to : https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/909264/naming-conventions-in-active-directory-for-computers-domains-sites-and

Am 11.11.2016 um 17:33 schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Hello Ronny, > > Am 11.11.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Ronny Forberger via samba: >> I want to authenticate against Samba 4 using samba and sssd on FreeBSD >> using this guide: >> >> http://serverfault.com/questions/599200/how-to-integrate-active-directory-with-freebsd-10-0-using-security-sssd >> >> The problem

Hi, I want to authenticate against Samba 4 using samba and sssd on FreeBSD using this guide: http://serverfault.com/questions/599200/how-to-integrate-active-directory-with-freebsd-10-0-using-security-sssd The problem is, the machine I want to install authentication on is the domain controller itsself. So the following commands show the errors: net ads join

Here is the error that I get: Assertion failed: (i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!" Yakov On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote: > You'll probably need to dump both the source and the dest and show the > code that's being

yes - i checked that the src->getType()->isFloatTy() is true Yakov On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > On 14/11/11 19:20, Yakov Malinkovich wrote: > >> I sure that is. >> > > Did you test it? Can you do: src->getType()->isFloatTy() > > > What could be other reasons for such error? > > The only

I sure that is.What could be other reasons for such error? Yakov On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > On 14/11/11 16:39, Yakov Malinkovich wrote: > >> It doesnt work it fails with assertation that cast is invalid .What >> could be done? >> > > Maybe src doesn't have Float type? > > Ciao, Duncan. > > >

So what do you think the problem is? Thank you. Yakov On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > On 14/11/11 21:11, Yakov Malinkovich wrote: > >> Here is the error that I get: >> Assertion failed: (i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == >> Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a