similar to: strategy to migrate dc from one pc to another.

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > karel de macil via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 14 juli 2020 21:55 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] strategy to migrate dc from one pc to another. > > >> Yes, you can run the internal dns server on one DC and Bind9 on > >> another, I

Today I noticed something that has been going on for some weeks: I have 2 dc, (dc1 and dc2) both debian buster with the distro provided samba (4.9.5), recently upgraded from stretch. samba-tool drs showrepl on dc2 says DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=wetron,DC=es Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 via RPC DSA object GUID: 89812346-9037-43b0-86ab-c5052f55125d

Package: xen-utils-4.1 Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u4 Severity: serious Tags: patch dom0 running wheezy domU upgraded from wheezy to jessie. The domU doesn't boot any more, errors: Error code: Using <class 'grub.GrubConf.Grub2ConfigFile'> to parse /grub/grub.cfg Error parameters: Traceback (most recent call last):, File "/usr/lib/xcp/lib/pygrub.xcp", line 853, in

>> A substantial reason I'm not using debian/devuan is LTS support. RPvs> Debian has its own version of LTS: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS Yeah, I've seen that. Not a lot of faith in it though. It sounds a lot like "trust me, someone's going to do it." [I know, cheap, quick, well done - and I want all three. Sigh.] If they'd been doing it the last five years and

Yesterday, after a long run, i've finally upgraded my DCs to stretch/samba4.9, using Louis repos. Hurrah! ;-) Looking forward, eg: http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/dists/ seems to me that i can advance to 4.10 in stretch, but to go further i need buster (probably because of python deps, right?). Louis, i think we need a matrix of debian-samba compatibility... ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64 Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: important about every 1 in 10 boots I am getting the following error: (XEN) ************************************ (XEN) CPU0 FATAL TRAP 6 (invalid opcode), ERROR_CODE 0000, IN INTERRUPT CONTEXT. (XEN) System shutting down -- need manual reset. (XEN) ************************************ This seems to happen in the CPU detection

On 2/12/19 1:35 AM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10 2019, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> >> Please remove the 'xm' file from the bash-completion package. This >> command does not exist in Xen any more (last time it was relevant was in >> Jessie, where it was already deprecated). > > That should be easy to do for Debian. On the other hand, I

Hi everybody ! I am encountering performance problem on my bridgehead DC. I have 19 DC (Debian Stretch / Samba 4.6.7 from Tranquil.it repo) and they all synchronized on a main bridgehead DC. This performance problem first appears when the bridgehead DC was on Debian Jessie and kernel was updated with meltdown/spectre patch from Debian (3.16.51-3+deb8u1) I added "nopti" option to grub

Hi! recently we upgraded a Debian jessie server to Debian buster, with Samba being upgraded from 4.5.12 (+dfsg-2+deb9u3) to 4.9.5 (+dfsg-5+deb10u1). A few hours later we saw these errors in syslog: smbd[26024]: [2020/02/03 11:13:13.631613, 0] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:79(ldb_wrap_debug) smbd[26024]: ldb: Failure during ltdb_lock_read(): Locking error ? Busy smbd[26024]:

L.P.H. van Belle via samba writes: > Is samba-dsdb-modules installed ? Yes, I checked again, and all packages are installed, all of them with the proper version, and no leftovers. This server works fine for a half a day, and then these errors happen, so I think it's unlikely that it's related to the install itself. I have already made a backup of all tdb files with tdbbackup and

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Running Backup Exec or a copy command to NFS-Share causes the VM regurarly to freeze. First message on VM-Console: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, apparently there WAS a change on the Windows Server, which only affected new samba versions I was able to fix my issue by using this patch: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12776 Can this be officially fixed please? >-----Original Message----- >From: Lange Norbert >Sent: Dienstag, 08. August 2017 10:04 >To: samba at lists.samba.org >Subject: Smbclient cant

I have SambaDC, version 4.1.7, with Debian 7.5 My smb.conf ######################### # Global parameters [global] workgroup = TEST realm = test.lcl netbios name = ATLANTIS server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 10.0.0.8 allow dns updates = nonsecure server services = -dns log level = 3 host msdfs =

Package: xen-utils-4.4 Version: 4.4.1-9 Severity: normal # /usr/lib/xen-4.4/bin/xl create -c /etc/xen/katana Parsing config from /etc/xen/katana libxl: error: libxl_utils.c:217:logrename: failed to rotate logfile - could not rename /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-katana.log.6 to /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-katana.log.7: Permission denied Segmentation fault The above happens repeatably when I run xl on a system

I am currently upgrading several Debian servers from stretch (9.x) to buster (10.x). At that site we run 2 DCs (so far samba-4.10.x) and 2 DMs (one 4.10.x, one 4.11.x since yesterday) I assume it's not wrong or problematic to mix releases and have DMs on 4.11 and DCs on 4.10 ? Anything to consider here? Is it preferrable to upgrade the DCs first (4.10 -> 4.11) or do the DMs first (as I

Am 05.08.19 um 10:41 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 05/08/2019 09:33, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> The saga around the misnamed DC seems over, so let's open a new thread >> ;-) >> >> In the same AD I see this: >> >> in smbstatus I see a smbd-PID for a Username "root", Group "root" >> >> But the actual

Package: bash-completion Version: 1:2.8-5 Hi bash completion maintainer, Please remove the 'xm' file from the bash-completion package. This command does not exist in Xen any more (last time it was relevant was in Jessie, where it was already deprecated). Also, I just hijacked another of your bugs, 768005 , about the xl command completion. Hope that's fine, we can maintain this in

Hi all, I'm simply overwhelmed with both the speed and quality of responses. I wish all mailing lists and forums were like this! I'm going to follow your suggestions and try to follow the template below. My choice of new DC will probably be 4.9.5 on buster. What steps would you recommend to unlink my broken 4.0.9 -> 4.5.16 replication before shutting down 4.5.16? Is it sufficient

Hai guys, After a few messages on the list on Buster, i decided to upgrade one of my production AD-DC's and see what happens. If noticed a few things here, so here are the steps and changes i made to upgrade and have a correct working AD-DC after the upgrade. Setup is as followed: Debian Stretch AD-DC with Bind9 DLZ and ntp time. This is still the base i used for my AD-DC

I'm building a new Ubuntu 16.04 machine, including Dovecot. When I select the dovecot-core package in Synaptic, it also wants to install ntpdate. Problem: ntpdate has been replaced in Ubuntu with timedatectl. In fact, if ntpdate exists on the machine, ntpd will not work properly. See: https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/NTP.html See: