similar to: Active Directory List Object Mode

Am 26.06.20 um 11:07 schrieb Matthias Leopold via samba: > Hi, > > I'm trying to hide objects in Samba AD 4.12.3 for certain users. > I found several tutorials, they all mention "List Object Mode" as an > option. Is this supposed to work with Samba AD? I was able to enable it, > but it doesn't seem to have any effect when I follow the recipes for > hiding

thanks for caring about this. Ming Xie, are you opening this BZ bug? thanks matthias Am 2017-07-07 um 13:31 schrieb Tomáš Golembiovský: > Hi, > > yes it is an issue in VDSM. We count on the disks being in storage pool > (except for block devices). > > Can you open a BZ bug for that please. > > Thanks, > > Tomas > > > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 02:52:26

Am 2018-02-19 um 17:39 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:03:31 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to setup Samba 4.6 on CentOS 7.4 as a Domain Member of a >> Windows 2012R2 Domain Controller with AD. To administer share >> security i have to use the "username

I could reproduce customer's problem Packages: rhv:4.1.3-0.1.el7 vdsm-4.19.20-1.el7ev.x86_64 virt-v2v-1.36.3-6.el7.x86_64 libguestfs-1.36.3-6.el7.x86_64 Steps: 1.Prepare a guest which is not listed storage pool # virsh dumpxml avocado-vt-vm1 .... <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/> <source

hi, i'm trying to import a VM in oVirt from a KVM host that doesn't use storage pools. this fails with the following message in /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log: 2017-07-05 09:34:20,513+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/5) [root] Error getting disk size (v2v:1089) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/v2v.py", line 1078, in _get_disk_info vol =

Hi, I've been running a samba server with winbind (CentOS 7) as a member of an AD Domain (Windows 2012 R2) for several months without a problem. "Suddenly" I'm seeing the problem that the membership in newly created AD groups isn't correctly visible for some users on the samba server or only after some indefinite amount of time. I'm looking simply at the output of

I'm trying to use auth bind to avoid having a plain text password in a config file. With %u instead of %n, the @domain part of the login ends up in the uid field of the search filter. As I said, my OUs have overlapping users, so I have configured things such that the users are logging in with user at domain, and need to get the domain component into the search base as you cannot filter on

Am 11.02.19 um 16:33 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:40:02 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Hi, I'm trying to configure dovecot to use LDAP authentication directly, and I'm having a bit of trouble. I have a somewhat unusual setup, in that I have an LDAP directory that has 3 OUs each of which have their own set of users, some of which overlap. As I was trying to figure things out, I was setting the search base in my /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext file which is referenced

Thank you Kees. On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 09:37, Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am currently running at 4.19.2 but I have run 4.18.6 and 4.18.5. I did > not experience any issues with nested group lookups, which many of the > filters rely on. Interestingly, I've now found that (on my current DCs, running 4.18.5), ldbsearch *does* seem to return the

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:51:41AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 21:45 +0100, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try > > again: > > Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with > > POSIX > > ACLs on the same server

Hi, i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and groups...) on my standalone fileserver (security = user). "passdb backend = ldapsam" already works OK and i found some old posts on the internet about "chaining" passdb backends. so i tried "chaining" ldapsam and tdbsam, but although testparm doesn't complain and i can add local users with

Hi, I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try again: Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with POSIX ACLs on the same server (security = user)? Since share permissions are handled differently for both types of shares I'm not sure if this will work. I know I could try it out myself, but the question again just came to my mind and I think

Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba >> standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves >> mainly other purposes and access for Samba is

Am 2015-09-24 um 20:32 schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Hello Matthias, > > Am 23.09.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Leopold: >> this seems to be a mat{,t}hias discussion ;-) > > oh, sorry. :-) > > > > >> Marc, you said i can have windows ACLs on a standalone server. How do i >> accomplish the >>

Hi, the instructions for "Time Synchronisation - SELinux Labeling and Policy" on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation_-_SELinux_Labeling_and_Policy don't seem to work on CentOS 8. Using chrony I tried to adapt them (with very limited SELinux knowledge) like this: chcon -u system_u -t chronyd_exec_t /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd semanage fcontext -a -t chronyd_exec_t

hi, i'm trying to recompile the httpd rpm on a x86_64 system. all i've changed in the spec file is the "--with-suexec-docroot" configure option. the error message i get from the "rpmbuild -ba SPECS/httpd.spec" command is "ln: creating symbolic link `/var/tmp/httpd-root/etc/httpd/logs' to `../../usr/var/log/httpd': No such file or directory". so

hi, today i upgraded from asterisk 1.4.21 to 1.6.2.9 (i know this release is not supported anymore, please don't tell me to upgrade). unfortunately now i can't use the rxfax() application anymore. i tried to use ReceiveFAX() the way i used to use rxfax() (multiple dedicated fax extensions getting their faxes from isdn via zaptel/dahdi), but this doesn't work. either fax

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:09:43 +0100 Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I noticed I didn't ask a question ;-) > I noticed that you didn't give us much to work with ;-) Can you post the smb.conf files from the working ldap machine and the non-working 'tdb' machine. Rowland