similar to: Samba as a domain member:

Hi, I followed the guide here below to add my Samba client to an AD PDC (rid backend): https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member The end result is that commands such as: # wbinfo -g # wbinfo -u work fine in that I get a domain group and user listing. Also, computers in the domain network can transparently authenticate (Windows) to the newly-added (joined) Linux

Yes: # getent group GROUP group:x:17573: # getent group group2 group2:x:11010: # getent group GROUP3 group3:x:21178: # wbinfo --group-info GROUP group:x:17573: # wbinfo -n GROUP S-1-5-21-948789634-15155995-928725530-7573 SID_DOM_GROUP (2)

OK, interesting debate, but I still can't convert to SID. I still get messages such as this one: AUTH-PAM: BACKGROUND: my_conv[0] query='Cannot convert group GROUP to sid, please contact your administrator to see if group GROUP is valid.' style=4 # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret for domain DOMAIN via RPC calls succeeded # wbinfo --ping-dc checking the NETLOGON for

It's Gentoo Linux. System uname: Linux-5.4.38-gentoo-x86_64-x86_64-AMD_EPYC_7272_12-Core_Processor-with-gentoo-2.6 KiB Mem: 32746472 total, 27513712 free KiB Swap: 37005244 total, 37005244 free Timestamp of repository gentoo: Fri, 29 May 2020 00:45:01 +0000 Head commit of repository gentoo: 9e5f0b894af4ad7780998a137656d0835b73213e sh bash 5.0_p17 ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.33.1 p2) 2.33.1

Nice call. It almost worked except for a small error in 'man pam_winbind' -- DOMAIN\\GROUP should actually be DOMAIN\GROUP in the pam.d file. Now, I'm a bit confused. The pam module 'pam_winbind' is from the Samba suite. OpenVPN is just passing on the authentication decision to Samba. However, I was expecting to just use the group name without the domain name since I have

OK for the DC. I noticed that converting users and groups to sid with the example below seems to work fine: # wbinfo -n DOMAIN\\user S-1-5-21-948789634-15155995-928725530-6864 SID_USER (1) # wbinfo -n DOMAIN\\group S-1-5-21-948789634-15155995-928725530-11178 SID_DOM_GROUP (2) However, applications using PAM and winbind seem to fail when trying to convert to sid. For instance, just to name one,

Hi, I followed the instructions in the section "Squid (transparent) Running on the Firewall" on http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html to setup Squid transparently on a Linux gateway. My net is as follows: loc subnet --- fw Linux Gateway --- ADSL router 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.92 (eth1) WAN.WAN.WAN.2 (gw = WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN (eth0) 192.168.1.92) (gw =

Are shorewall-shell and shorewall-common required at compile time even if one only wishes to use shorewall-perl (4.0.9)? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Does anyone know of a script that can act as a "helper" for Shorewall''s dynamic blacklist capabilities? Briefly said, I''d like to know if someone already wrote a script/program that, e.g., parses log files (/var/log/messages, etc) and picks up for example all IP addresses that failed SSH login more than X times and then executes a command such as shorewall drop

In my peculiar setup I need my shorewall router to do one-to-one NAT with RFC1918 addresses. The "external" addresses are 10.215.0.0 and the internal addresses are 192.168.0.0. I can ping, vnc, http, smb from 10.215.144.48 to 10.215.145.237 which is 192.168.44.237 internally. >From 192.168.44.237 I can do http, rdp, ping to 10.215.0.0 hosts. So all seems fine except for the fact

Hello, I''m reading this guide on ipv6 (really just getting my "feet wet"): http://www.shorewall.net/6to4.htm In the section "Configuring IPv6 using my script" I can read that the IPv6 interfaces are: INTERFACES="eth2 eth4" and that correlates fine with the first diagram/figure. However, further down I read "You will notice that sit1, eth0 and eth2

I'm trying to use the txfax application based on spandsp in Asterisk 1.2. It seems to be working but I would need a way to reliably check whether the fax has been completely transferred or not. I'm using a mail2fax system (as with email2fax and .call files) but I can't seem to get it working. If I use "Application" and "Data" in the .call file, there doesn't

I''m new to openvpn and maybe I should be asking on openvpn''s list... But I read the tutorial: http://www.shorewall.net/OPENVPN.html#id2452626 and saw the following: " On System A: ifconfig 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.2 " I don''t understand the reason for using these "virual" IPs. For instance, I configured openvpn on my peers so that the IPs on the

You said, "From what you posted earlier, the domain already points to the new DC, you just need to get the DNS fsmo roles." how so? The fsmo show, shows PDC, which is the old DC. DC01 is the new one. Or am I missing something else? As far as keeping it online I will just move everything I can and then seize and shut it down. I can turn off the networking to it since it is a VM and

Hello Rowland, thanks for your help. My replies lines below: > Do the DCs point at each other for dns ? > > i.e. is /etc/resolv.conf on the first DC something like this: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.second.dc > nameserver ip.of.this.dc > > and on the second DC: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.first.dc > nameserver

Hi, What can I make of the following log messages? Extension 7114 tries to reach 6035 but gets an "unknown channel type". What does it mean? (supposedly, 6035 was not busy...) Apr 12 13:01:01 VERBOSE[30989] logger.c: -- Executing Dial("SIP/7114-b4fe1ef0", "/6035|300|") in new stack Apr 12 13:01:01 WARNING[30989] channel.c: No channel type registered for

I'm working my way off of our Windows 2003 R2 Domain Server. That machine is called PDC, sorry really bad planning so many years ago! So my end goal is to have two samba4 domain controllers. They are setup and joined as DC's, dc01 and dc02. I have most of my files off of PDC but would like to keep it up for a little longer to make sure I have everything off of there. So I tried

> After demotion and reinstallation I joined DC1 with success again, but all SRV-entries (_kerberos, _ldap, _kpasswd) > were not generated. SOLVED, everything works fine. The DNS-SRV-entries were not generated, because after transferring the roles, the SOA-entries for all zones contained still the old DC which didnt exist anymore. I changed to the new PDC. Same for the DNS-entry

I just transfered fsmo roles from one DC to my newer DC and all went well. Thank you Samba team!! Great documentation, BTW. My domain (basically) consists of one ADDC, one member server and two W10 clients and one W7 client. While setting up the newer DC had been running some nslookup on the DC's and decided to run nslookup on my member server and do not know if I have discovered and

Please forgive me, I'm not sure what terminology to use here so this question may sound wrong. I have built two servers samba servers with a new domain. They replicate happily and I can seem to do everything I could ever want on them. DC01 holds all the FSMO roles and, as the first one built, acts as the "master" for DNS. Nothing works well on either server if DC01 is not at the