similar to: Add New DNS Server

Hello, after demote and rejoun my dc2 i have problems with replication. First of all some srv records on dc1 are missing, on dc2 they are exist. root at dc2:~# dig srv _ldap._tcp.ForestDnsZones.samdom.example.com @dc2.samdom.example.com. ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Debian <<>> srv _ldap._tcp.ForestDnsZones.samdom.example.com @dc2.samdom.example.com. ;; global

joined another DC running Bind9. but dns is not in sync. dig ns samdom.example.com @dc1.samdom.example.com ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian <<>> ns samdom.example.com @dc1.samdom.example.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34734 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;;

joined another DC running Bind9. but dns is not in sync. dig ns samdom.example.com @dc1.samdom.example.com ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian <<>> ns samdom.example.com @dc1.samdom.example.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34734 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;;

On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was > hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC work > right now.? Need to update that. >> >> -- >> Bob Wooldridge >> > You can run a caching nameserver that forwards your AD dns zones to > your AD DC, but you can

On 10/12/15 10:54, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/12/15 10:44, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. >> >> This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, >> so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should >> have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my

Hello, I've finally decided to switch all FSMO roles from Windows 2008 R2 DC (vm-dc1) to one of the two Samba 4.12.3 DCs (vm-dc3). Here are several issues I've faced after that: 1. After connecting DNS Manager to the all DCs, I've found that the SOA record for my domain and msdcs zones still point to the former PDC - vm-dc1. Is that OK? 2. So, I've changed the SOA manually

On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> Everything you say is valid except for when it comes to AD dns. >>>> When you want data from a zone, you start with the SOA record, you

Hi. I'm running Sernet Samba 4.7 on Ubuntu 16. I noticed that when my first DC went away, I had problems. The SOA record for the domain still points at that first DC. I found, in this entry from 2014 ( https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-August/184301.html) that "Windows AD servers actually 'lie' about the SOA record, and always say that it points to themselves. So in a

Your config looks ok, as far i can tell. This : "cifs/kvm7246-vm022.maas.local at TC84.LOCAL" As it should spn/hostname.fqdn at REALM nothing wrong with that. But if i understand it right. Your server : kvm7246-vm022.maas.local is in REALM : TC83.LOCAL ( NTDOM:TC83 ) But you get TC84 back?. On the problem server run the following: dig a kvm7246-vm022.maas.local @IP_of_AD-DC

Hai, Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my opinion and i can be wrong here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Is it possible to change the DNS listening IP? I'd like to run a dnscache service for primary LAN queries, but the only way to do this with Samba seems to be iptables preroute configuration to redirect port 53 requests. Thanks, -- Greg J. Zartman Board Member, and Developer Koozali SME Server www.koozali.org SME Server user, contributor, and community member since 2000

On 10/12/15 12:58, James wrote: > On 12/10/2015 6:55 AM, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 10/12/15 10:54, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 10/12/15 10:44, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>>> Hai, >>>> >>>> Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. >>>> >>>> This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba,

2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". >> > > No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to > contact for the domain records. > Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means

Forgot to reply to this Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> writes: > Hi Aurélien, > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Aurélien Aptel via samba wrote: >> At this point I think it should work, but I get: >> >> $ smbclient //foo.com/share -k > > I guess you need to specify the FQDN of the host, not the domain. Yes that was it, thanks! But both the

Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2019, 14:13 +0100 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 03/10/2019 13:43, Dipl.-Ing. P?ter Varkoly via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after installing a samba-4.8.9 AD-Server there is/are an A-Records > > created for the domain delivering the ip-address(es) of the AD- > > server. > > This ip can be changed vie "samba-tool dns

> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:29 AM > >> >> Since the localhost4 approach worked, commend out the ipv6 >> localhost entries in your /etc/hosts file, then try: >>

I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I come across the following: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are 2 years old?

from both DC: dig google.com dig @8.8.8.8 google.com First dig will use resolvers declared into /etc/resolv.conf. Second dig forces usage of 8.8.8.8. Both commands should reply the same things, on all DC. 2016-06-30 15:58 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>: > On 6/30/2016 9:57 AM, Garland McAlexander wrote: > >> nslookup google.com

> Date: Sunday, August 26, 2018 21:10:48 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2018 8:31 PM >> >> > Date: Sunday, August 26, 2018 16:25:14 -0400 >> > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> >> >

[It is more an AD question then a Samba question, but...] I need to do some LDAP query in an AD domain, plain LDAP query, mostly to query non-auth data (eg, emails). There's a DNS name that map to 'round robin the AD DC of the current site'? I need an 'A' record, not an SRV record, eg i need to put in my apps/MFP/... an LDAP server DNS name that round robin between the