similar to: File server questions

Le jeu. 4 juin 2020 ? 15:43, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 04/06/2020 14:13, mathias dufresne via samba wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm back working on Samba subjects and rather than writing stupidities, I > > decided to come and use your knowledge : ) > > > > nmbd: in modern configurations running nmbd is

Le jeu. 4 juin 2020 ? 16:48, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 04/06/2020 15:25, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > > System users are users which can be used in system side. Typically > > those in /etc/passwd but for a more generic approach I mean "each and > > every users available through 'getent passwd [username]'"

Le jeu. 4 juin 2020 ? 15:43, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 04/06/2020 14:13, mathias dufresne via samba wrote: > [...] > > smbd: the file server, at least for modern usage. It can also grab user > > information from AD but not for system users, only for Samba users (the > > applicative users, used to authenticate when accessing

Hi, I thought Samba4 was able to do everything what was doing Samba3. According to that isn't it possible for you to add a new DC into your NT4 domain which runs Samba4? As it is a DC in addition to others DC (those running Samba3) your domain should continue to work as it did for years. You would just get another DC running more recent Samba. I expect that Samba4 as filesrv is able to

On 04/06/2020 15:25, mathias dufresne wrote: > > System users are users which can be used in system side. Typically > those in /etc/passwd but for a more generic approach I mean "each and > every users available through 'getent passwd [username]'" 'system users' are usually the users with an ID of less than 1000 > > In fact winbindd seems to me

2016-07-10 2:12 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: > On Sat, 2016-07-09 at 11:27 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Am 09.07.2016 um 09:14 schrieb Rowland penny: > > > > What is the purpose of the option > > > > * > > > > **--with-**systemd** > > > > ****Enable****systemd****integration* >

First, background information. We are a large (geographically local) organization with 50 sites, including our HQ. Each site has a Debian Server running Samba in NT-Domain Controller mode. Each site is independant of the next, but are all named <SITE>.example.com. The workstations are connected, and working fine in our sites with the single servers. We had a recent network upgrade that now

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:00 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Chris, can you check into your unit file what kind of type is used? Mine use Type=forking, I had some issues with Type=notify but it's been some time so I can't remember what they were. Although one is that a "systemctl start samba" command did not return a prompt, had to Ctrl-C out.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:13 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you simply try to modify type=forking to type=notify and test again? > Perhaps your old has disappeared (they do sometimes, not often enough)... Seems to work for starting smbd and nmbd (although Type=forking has been running flawlessly for many months) on my Gentoo system. In my Debian LXC

If my messages seems somehow unreadable - I sent it from Gmail Web UI. mathias dufresne, read my 2 or 3 last messages. I wrote about mounting \\server\share as disk and risky fo viruses crypting files. Also read messages other, who does not work in AirBus. And more over, it' s your oppinion. But I see useless of more discussion at atll. If you want to combine your efforts to help with

On 04/06/2020 14:13, mathias dufresne via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm back working on Samba subjects and rather than writing stupidities, I > decided to come and use your knowledge : ) > > nmbd: in modern configurations running nmbd is not necessary and could > perhaps even be seen as security issue: it seems to allow NetBIOS > authentication which is not

Hi all, I just add into my AD a user with different values for attributes "CN" and "name". Here is an extract of the LDIF used to add this user: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ dc202:~# egrep 'cn:|name:' mathias.ldif cn: Mathias Dufresne (CN) *name: mathias.dufresne*

Hi, I´m have a Samba 4 Domain Member that I use like a Proxy Server. I use Squid with NTLM Athentication and work perfecly. My problem is Squidguard with NTLM Authentication. If I use Samba 4.2.X in my Samba 4 Domain Controler I watch in Squid LOG only the user name but If I use Samba 4.1.x or 4.3.0 in my Domain Controler I watch in Squid LOG domain\\user name and Squidguard Authentication not

Le ven. 5 juin 2020 ? 19:53, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 05/06/2020 14:33, mathias dufresne via samba wrote: > > Le jeu. 4 juin 2020 ? 15:43, Rowland penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> > > a ?crit : > > > >> On 04/06/2020 14:13, mathias dufresne via samba wrote: > >> [...] > >>>

Thank you Rowland for that reply, even if answer to Q2 is not a list of deplicated attributes but the schema which contains all attributes. To answer you: I'm trying to understand. I'm currently working for one company to help them design an AD hosted by Samba. I won't be there to manage it and they already have peoples working with LDAP trees, these coming with their own habits. I

On 19/10/15 16:46, mathias dufresne wrote: > AD from Samba or Microsoft is mainly a database for storing users (and > associated stuffs). It comes also with stuffs (protocols) to connect and > retrieve information. > > How the client uses these information is, as always, a choice from that > specific client. > > Your AD client is your Squid/Squidguard(ian) server. Its job

Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com >>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com >>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>:

Just run some samba as file server, or perhaps you can even just run nmbd on another host than on your DC. That host running nmbd will participate to browsing election, it should win election if you ask for it in smb.conf. Only DC won't appear in network neighborhood, which is not an issue as even your users loves waste your company time in searching in network neighborhood, they have nothing

2015-06-30 12:42 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 30/06/15 11:17, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> @Andrew: I expect these lines came from RDP issue workaround which should >> be happening with previous Samba version. I removed all these lines as >> now, >> with 4.2.2 Samba version RDP and RSAT are working well without them. >>

Hi, You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was surprised by this file size limitation on such a system. My bad regarding the title : ) Cheers, mathias 2015-06-01 15:03 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 01/06/15 13:47, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead on