similar to: Shadow Copy2 & zfs Snapshots

Hello Dear Samba Users, I have sucessfully set a samba share on a centos 7 box (samba 4.6.2) and succeeded into make work snapshots (vfs_shadow_copy2 with xfs and lvm). The snapshots appears well in windows previous versions. However, I expected to go further with snapshots and use the options "shadow:snapprefix" and "shadow:delimiter"in order to filter daily, weekly

So I'm trying to get shadow copies to work with Windows clients. The snapshots are being stored at /test/.zfs/snapshot The snapshots are being named like so: autosnap_2019-08-10_21:00:00_frequently autosnap_2019-08-10_21:00:00_monthly autosnap_2019-08-10_22:00:00_hourly This is in my smb.conf: [test] vfs objects = shadow_copy2 shadow:snapdir = /test/.zfs/snapshot shadow:snapprefix =

Hi I could not get a custom "shadow:delimiter" for the vfs shadow_copy2 module to work successfully for me with Samba 4.6.2. I did not try previous versions. Based on my testing it seems that an additional line of code is needed in vfs_shadow_copy2.c as shown in the patch below (some comment updates are included too for code readability). Without the below patch, previous versions

Hi Jeremy, Here's the log with log level 10: https://pastebin.com/0EAuz2B8 The location of the shared folder: /pool/shadowtest The location of the snapshots: /pool/shadowtest/.zfs/snapshot Here are how snapshots are named: autosnap_2019-09-01_13:29:01_daily autosnap_2019-09-01_13:29:01_hourly autosnap_2019-09-01_13:44:09_frequently And this is currently in my smb.conf file: [shadowtest]

Hi Sebastian, why are you using shadow:snapprefix if this is just ?snap?? Does it work using ONLY shadow:format = snap_GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S ? If you use snapprefix you also need to use shadow:delimiter (in your case this would be ?_?). However, I never managed to get it working with snapprefix on my machines. Alexander > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 2:52 PM, Sebastian Neustein via samba

Hello all, I already successfully configured shadow copy service without a delimiter and regex. But as soon as I try to get this to work with regex, nothing shows up on the win client. My config looks like this: [global] shadow: localtime = yes shadow: sort = desc shadow: format = _%FT%T shadow: delimiter = _ shadow: snapprefix = ^\(monthly\)\{0,1\}\(weekly\)\{0,1\}\(daily\)\{0,1\}$

====================================================== "It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop." Confucius ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. UPGRADING ========= NTLMv1

====================================================== "It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop." Confucius ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. UPGRADING ========= NTLMv1

Hi I am trying to get shadow_copy2 to read gluster snapshots and provide the users with previous versions of their files. Here is my smb.conf: [global] ??????? security = ADS ??????? workgroup = AD ??????? realm = AD.XXX.XX ??????? netbios name = A32X ??????? log file = /var/log/samba/%m ??????? log level = 1 ??????? idmap config * : backend = tdb ??????? idmap config * : range =

Hello, i installed zfs-auto-snapshot with Samba/Windows Shadow Copy. If the share contains "path = /srv/userdata/" it runs for me. But if I use "path = /srv/userdata/%U" I get no "Previous Versions" on my Win10 Client. I think the problem is the variable "shadow: snapdir = .zfs/snapshot". I tried with "shadow: snapdir = ../.zfs/snapshot" and

Hi Alexander # net conf delparm projects shadow:snapprefix does not change a thing. The error persists. (I killed my smb session before trying again). log still says: [2023/05/22 15:23:23.324179,? 1] ../../source3/modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c:2222(shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data) ? shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data: SMB_VFS_NEXT_OPEN failed for

On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 16:45 +0200, Sebastian Neustein wrote: > > Does it make a difference if you re-mount the volume without 'acl' > > option? Even otherwise can you try listing the snapshot contents > > from the server as a user(and not super user) who in reality tries > > to list previous versions from Windows? I feel like it has > > something to do with

Hello, we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned volume to use gluster-snapshots. Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and everything was working fine. Then we added the shadow_copy2 parameters, when we did a "smbclient" we got the following message: root at

> Does it make a difference if you re-mount the volume without 'acl' > option? Even otherwise can you try listing the snapshot contents from > the server as a user(and not super user) who in reality tries to list > previous versions from Windows? I feel like it has something to do with > permissions setup for the user accessing the share. It does make a difference! First

We have: vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl (Actually, vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl fruit streams_xattr, but I wanted to point out the order of shadow_copy2 and zfsacl). To rule out shadow:format problems, I would create just one snapshot with a simple name and configure shadow:format accordingly. Also, is /public the mountpoint of the ZFS dataset? If not, then you might need

Hi, I have a FreeBSD 12.1 system with Samba 4.11.8 using ZFS and I want to get shadow copies working, however the clients (Windows 10) don't show anything in the 'previous versions' tab. I think it's doing something as it say 'working' for a short amount of time. Also if I crank up vfs debugging to 10 I get: [2020/10/05 16:50:03.879093, 10, pid=50572, effective(0, 0),

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I have a problem with a duplicate route entry, when using a pre-installed route and automatic take-over by the "heartbeat" daemon, which adds an address and the kernel adds an route automatically. Maybe anyone has an explanation... > ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo

Hi, everybody: Forgive me for bringing this to you. We normally use Samba servers but are dealing with a situation involving two Windows 2003 servers and browsing, and the truth is, I can't think of a better forum to bring questions about browsing. We have the following situation: Domain controller is a Windows 2000 machine at 192.168.0.100 The backup domain controller is a Windows 2003

This is a recent R-devel. file.copy() is not vectorized if multiple destinations succeed: cat("foo1\n", file = "foo1") cat("foo2\n", file = "foo2") unlink(c("copy1", "copy2"), recursive = TRUE) file.copy(c("foo1", "foo2"), c("copy1", "copy2"), copy.date = TRUE) #> Error in

Hello all: I don't know what I'm doing bad, but --link-dest does not work for me: I have three directories, the original one, the first copy and the second copy I want to populate: $ ls -li total 12 1761433 drwxr-xr-x 2 envite envite 4096 dic 10 14:04 copy1 1761434 drwxr-xr-x 2 envite envite 4096 dic 11 01:18 copy2 1761432 drwxr-xr-x 2 envite envite 4096 dic 10 14:04 origin $ ls -li *