similar to: Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?"

2020 May 15
3
Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?
On Fri, 15 May 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/05/2020 13:48, Harald Hannelius wrote: >> >> I created a script that looped on 'getent passwd' from the old DC. It >> called samba-tool and pdbedit to add the users; >> >> samba-tool user create $username Some2pass/e --use-username-as-cn >> --nis-domain=sad --unix-home=$home
2020 May 15
0
Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?
On 15/05/2020 13:48, Harald Hannelius wrote: > > I created a script that looped on 'getent passwd' from the old DC. It > called samba-tool and pdbedit to add the users; > > samba-tool user create $username Some2pass/e --use-username-as-cn > --nis-domain=sad --unix-home=$home --uid-number=$uid > --login-shell=/bin/bash --gid-number=100
2020 May 15
2
Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?
On Fri, 15 May 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/05/2020 16:33, Harald Hannelius wrote: >> If there's a way to copy the sambaNTPassword password-hash from the LDAP >> for the Samba 3 DC with samba-tool I would have loved to find that >> information long ago :) > Why do you need the sambaNTPassword ? So the users would have the same password. I don't
2020 May 14
2
samba-tool and --given-name or --surname format?
How do I add a user with samba-tool that has the givenname "?ke" or surname "?berg"? # samba-tool user create foobar 21asdasd// --given-name="?ke" ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'>): Failed to add user 'foobar': - 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 8: ordinal not in range(128) File
2020 May 14
1
samba-tool and --given-name or --surname format?
On Thu, 14 May 2020, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 13:24 +0300, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> How do I add a user with samba-tool that has the givenname "?ke" or >> surname >> "?berg"? > > The correct method is to use a version of Samba built with python3. My > understanding is that we have fixed that issue
2020 May 15
1
Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?
On 15/05/2020 14:28, Luca Olivetti via samba wrote: > > Well, then I don't know. I have a range 490-60000 for my domain and it > works. > I also have > > winbind nss info = rfc2307 > > but I don't know if it's relevant to your problem. Probably not, if you are running Samba >= 4.6.0 you can remove that line, it has been superceeded by: idmap config
2020 Sep 08
4
ACLs, groups and suid-bit?
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 08/09/2020 13:55, Harald Hannelius wrote: >> >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 08/09/2020 13:27, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have users in Samba AD with uid- and gidnumbers. I also have group
2020 Jun 04
5
Is Samba 4.9 and "map untrusted to domain" possible anymore?
We have a windows domain "AD" and a samba domain "SAD" running Samba 4.9 in AD-mode. We also have an old NT4 domain called "Samba" running Samba 3.6 + OpenLDAP. We have the same users and passwords in all three. The user objects in the "SAD"-domain have the same uidNumber as in the "Samba"-domain. Workstations and users log on to the windows
2020 Sep 08
2
ACLs, groups and suid-bit?
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 08/09/2020 13:27, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have users in Samba AD with uid- and gidnumbers. I also have group >> objects with gidNumbers. >> >> I have a Samba member server (all servers Samba 4.9.5-Debian) that have one >> share and a lot of directories.
2012 Mar 02
2
Write performance in a replicated/distributed setup with KVM?
This has probably been discussed before, but since I'm new on the list I hope You have patience with me. I have a four brick distributed/replicated setup. The computers are multi-core 16GB memory and 2*2.0TB in raid1 SATA-disks locally. The nodes are connected by 1 GB ethernet. All nodes have glusterfs 3.3beta2 installed and they are running debian 6 64bit. The underlying filesystems are
2020 Sep 08
2
ACLs, groups and suid-bit?
Hello, I have users in Samba AD with uid- and gidnumbers. I also have group objects with gidNumbers. I have a Samba member server (all servers Samba 4.9.5-Debian) that have one share and a lot of directories. The directory permissions are set as a specific group as owner, and the group write and suid bit are set. drwxrwsr-x 2 root thegroup 4096 Sep 8 15:25 groupdir This worked fine in
2020 Jun 17
2
Adding user to group doesn't propagate?
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 17/06/2020 11:54, Harald Hannelius wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 17/06/2020 11:39, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> >> Sorry, You lost me here. Has this been discussed recently? I'm in the >> middle of so many projects I haven't had time to sit and
2020 Jun 04
2
Is Samba 4.9 and "map untrusted to domain" possible anymore?
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 04/06/2020 13:49, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> >> Question 2) >> Does a windows client behave differently when speaking to a NT4-domain or >> an >> AD-domain in how they try passwords? I have a feeling that users in the >> "AD"-domain didn't need to (manually at least) enter any
2020 Sep 16
5
Adding user to group doesn't propagate?
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, Jonathon Reinhart via samba wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:21 AM Harald Hannelius via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Harald Hannelius wrote: >>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 17/06/2020 11:54,
2020 Aug 31
2
Adding user to group doesn't propagate?
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Harald Hannelius wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 17/06/2020 11:54, Harald Hannelius wrote: >>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 17/06/2020 11:39, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >>>>
2020 Jun 16
3
Wrong password, Win10 not using SMB3_11?
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 16/06/2020 12:41, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> I have Samba AD-domain with two fileservers and two Samba DS-servers. Most >> people can authenticate OK, but one user always gets "wrong password". > What versions of Samba ? All servers are 4.9.5-Debian. >> Auth: [SMB2,(null)] user [SAD]\[username]
2020 May 15
0
Problems with groups, minimum gidnumber?
[please keep replies on the list] El 15/5/20 a les 14:40, Harald Hannelius ha escrit:> > ????idmap config sad:unix_primary_group = yes > ????idmap config sad:unix_nss_info = yes > ????idmap config sad:range = 500-4000000 > ????idmap config sad:schema_mode = rfc2307 > ????idmap config sad:backend = ad > ????idmap config * : range = 5000000-9000000 > ????idmap config
2020 Jun 17
2
Adding user to group doesn't propagate?
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 17/06/2020 11:39, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> >> >> However, on the member-server 'id username' doesn't show this group. 'id >> username' shows this group for all other users in this group. > > So, it wasn't just me ;-) Sorry, You lost me here. Has this been discussed
2020 Jun 16
2
Wrong password, Win10 not using SMB3_11?
I have Samba AD-domain with two fileservers and two Samba DS-servers. Most people can authenticate OK, but one user always gets "wrong password". I tried changing this user's password, and was able to connect by using smbclient, and I was also able to map this drive using the user's username and password on my own windows 10 workstation. Also; # wbinfo -a username Enter
2020 Sep 17
2
Adding user to group doesn't propagate?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 16/09/2020 09:02, Harald Hannelius via samba wrote: >> On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, Jonathon Reinhart via samba wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:21 AM Harald Hannelius via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Harald Hannelius wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun