similar to: Unable to access shares by server alias

> Verify dig -x $(hostname -i) > Then dig A $(hostname -f) > > As long as these match any CNAME should work. These works, but why these should match a CNAME? hostname returns the "main" host... Anyway to make a test I configured a new CNAME #?dig server.wdc.mydomain.it ;; ANSWER SECTION: server.wdc.mydomain.it. 900 IN CNAME fileserver.wdc.mydomain.it.

hi , thank's for your reply . no , current DC doesn't have that GUID: samba-tool spn list zimbra$ zimbra$ ... ldap/3ecb2a51-b21d-4bef-84ed-700db7963ff4._msdcs.domain.lan samba-tool spn list landc$ landc$ ... ldap/5bf8cf1f-1e35-40c6-a20d-0abc88238d92._msdcs.domain.lan that GUID is of the machine we are trying to join to: samba-tool spn list nextcloud$ nextcloud$ ...

Mandi a te! Does it work just with the CNAME? My config actually worked in the end, but I think after I added the spn entries. I was testing on a machine which didn't reflect the change, but probably because of caching (ifconfig /flushdns didn't help) ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at

> samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Are you sure there's no typo or hidden character? provision command is still there in 4.18.2 :) # samba-tool domain provision ERROR: No domain set! -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA

Hi. We migrated a S4 workgroup to S4 AD DC, I'm trying to allow users to access the new \\fileserver with the old host name \\server. I added a CNAME record to the AD DNS zone, created alias for fileserver with samba-tool spn add ldap/SERVER fileserver$ samba-tool spn add HOST/SERVER fileserver$ I also added netbios aliases = server to smb.conf but this should be useless, as

> which share isn't working ? > is it 'CONDIVISIONE' ? What is really weird is: Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as local (not using domain user), share mapped with domain user. In the path I've posted in the first message the user can access BUT cannot write. Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as domain user: same as above, user can access the folder but cannot write.

> Yes you can use the Ubuntu 22.04 packages if you really must, but this > will only get you Samba 4.15.3 > On the other hand, Using Samba from backports on Debian bullseye will > get you 4.17.8 and is, in my opinion, easier to use. Both for Debian and Ubuntu it's better to use Michael repos, to get consistent minor release updates: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/README

Samba 4.12.1 installed from source following the wiki. I noticed /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba is not being rotated at all, it starts since the day I installed and it's still growing (500M so far). Is this something which must be handled manually with a logrotate entry? What signalling does samba require after the file has been rotated? I didn't find anything on the wiki, is it worth

Looks like a known issue when running samba as AD DC: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Perhaps try logrotate service to help rotate log.samba: https://linux.die.net/man/8/logrotate -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc. On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:26 PM Lorenzo Milesi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I know about this param, I configured it and

I never said the team does recommend it, still I don't see the purpose of saying "it's possible" when can be "fraught with problems". Maybe the wiki [1] should be more explicit on this, despite discouraging and suggesting better options it doesn't say it's highly problematic, it's still offered as an option.

> As I understand it, you only need Michael's repo for Ubuntu, The Debian > backport repo gets updated with the same Samba packages as his repo (or > is it the other way around ?). He is the Debian Samba maintainer. With the repos you can select several minor versions (from 4.16 to .18), while backports only contains the latest (currently 4.18) IIRC. -- Lorenzo Milesi -

Is it possible to delegate permissions to users using (Linux) command line? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Delegating_administrative_permissions_to_non-administrators thanks -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA - Tel +39 0341 220 205 -

> By setting this: vfs objects = recycle , you have turned of 'acl_xattr'. Ouch! :( Is there a way to keep acl_xattr and recycle? Shall I specify both of them? > You should also be aware that the permissions set from Windows (you are > setting them from Windows, aren't you ?) are stored in an EA. Yes, we're using RSAT from Windows. I see ea support has been set to yes

> Can I suggest you upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04 and use Louis's repo: > http://apt.van-belle.nl/ Unfortunately it's not a viable solution in the short period... Is there any problem with S4.12 and Ubuntu 18.04? Or with the default compile options on 18.04? thanks -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it YetOpen S.r.l. - https://www.yetopen.it/ Via Salerno 18 - 23900 Lecco -

> I would expect to only see that on a machine with the MIT kdc installed, > try this > > apt-get -s remove krb5-kdc > > This will prove one way or other if it is installed and what it wants to > remove along with it, it will not remove anything. Apparently nothing requires it: The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:

> Another five lines that have no place in an AD DC smb.conf, the 'vfs > object' line especially. thanks for the suggestions, but even with the basic smb.conf file compiled by the classicupgrade command we have the same issue on client machines, so it appears those parameters aren't creating the problem -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it YetOpen S.r.l. -

For the record, with the support of TranquilIT we added a new server for DC an "demoted" this one to fileserver only and it's working like a charm. So I suppose the "single server" solution is not viable anyomre, or at least it doesn't seem so. -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it YetOpen S.r.l. - https://www.yetopen.it/ Via Salerno 18 - 23900 Lecco -

We've recently upgraded a S3 to Samba4 with AD (4.3.11-Ubuntu). The access control on the old installation was done with "valid users" and "write list". We've ported this to ACL, but for some path users are denied access and we cannot understand why. I.e. for a generic share, user "user1" can browse and access almost everything except for directory

> Can I suggest you read 'man smb.conf' Thanks, but on what "topic"? Is there a specific param or config you think could be relevant? > Try adding 'server max protocol = NT1' and ensure SMBv1 is running on > all machines. Is this just for SMBv1 or because you think could be related to the login problem? > Also, is the ldap server really running on port

> That all smells quite similar to what I were seeing > here before, and what someone else were seeing too, > all with 4.17[.4]. This famouse WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND > error too. We upgraded one more domain, and in the hope to avoid this error, we remained on 4.16. So we deployed a new 4.16.9 DC, joined, everything is fine. Remove the old DC, upgrade OS, install 4.16.10 (which was