Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "demoted AD remains in samba-tool drs showrepl"
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi,
sorry to bother you:
I have three AD in the domain.
They all deliver different IDs:
root at addc2:~# id testuser
uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)
Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users)
root at addc3:~$ id testuser
uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)
2019 Jan 12
2
Online backup of domain fails
Hi Tim,
What we did:
setting "log level = 10" in smb.conf
then exdcute the following command:
------
samba-tool domain backup online --server=addc3 --targetdir=/root -k yes >backup.txt 2>&1
------
Then we grep for the message with "call_nt_transact_query_security_desc"
------
grep call_nt_transact_query_security_desc backup.txt
------
And got nothing :-(
still the
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi,
I have an old Fileserver which is working correct:
This is the smb.conf:
[global]
security = ads
realm = EXAMPLE.COM
workgroup = example
winbind refresh tickets = Yes
winbind use default domain = yes
template shell = /bin/bash
idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999
idmap config ZFD : backend = rid
idmap config ZFD : range = 0 - 200000
hide dotfiles = yes
server string =
2019 Aug 29
4
Permission Issue
Hai,
Great to hear i could help one with a gluster problem :-)
And ofcourse your allowed to keep us up2date.
So yes, plese, by doing that and sharing the configs it might help other people.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Benedikt Kale? via samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 2019 17:37
2019 Dec 18
3
DNS replication issue
Hi Rowland,
Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a
possible tip:
_kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com.
output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV
_kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the list.
Kind regards.
Collected config? --- 2019-12-18-20:30 -----------
Hostname: addc-new
DNS Domain:
2019 Dec 12
0
Replication issues samba 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster
Hello,
We added a new samba DC with 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster? to our
existing 5 ones and can?t obtain replication.
Comparing configuration with other functioning DCs did not show any
relevant difference.
The only difference during the configuration procedure was that DNS PTR
and A records were added after joining the domain and not before.
The sernet-samba-ad service is running but
2019 Jan 10
2
Online backup of domain fails
Hi,
thanks for your hints!
Am 10.01.19 um 03:46 schrieb Tim Beale via samba:
> - As a sanity-check, you could run 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck'
> locally on your DC. It may tell you if there's an ACL problem.
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck doesn't show any problems.
> - Instead of an online backup, try running 'samba-tool domain backup
> offline' locally on
2019 Aug 28
4
Permission Issue
Hi again,
regarding my post "plenty of vacuuuming process" a "gluster volume heal"
seems to improve the situation.
But I still have a strange problem:
Sometimes a user don't have permissions to? a restricted folder when h
connects to a share or logs in at a windows client. In some times all
permissions are granted. If the user creates a file, the user and group
is
2019 Aug 23
2
plenty of vacuuuming processes
Hi,
I have a ctdb cluster with 3 nodes and 3 glusterfs (version 6) nodes up
and running.
I observe plenty of these situations:
A connected Windows-10 client doesn't react anymore. I use forder
redirections.?
- Smbstatus shows up some (auth in progress) processes.
- In the logs of a ctdb node I get:
Aug 23 10:12:29 ctdb-1 ctdbd[2167]: Ending traverse on DB locking.tdb
(id 568831), records
2020 Apr 30
3
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Hi Denis,
thanks a lot!
> you said that the zone is empty. It is not a problem per se but for some
> time Bind-DLZ has been a bit more strict and ask for a NS record for
> every zone. So you just have to create a NS field in your zone pointing
> to one of your DC and you should be fine. Internal DNS does not have
> this requirements.
>
> samba-tool dns mydc
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi,
yes, I did.
I get the same results with "getent passwd testuser" on each node.
/etc/ctdb/nodes and /etc/ctdb/public_addresses is exactly the same on
each node
On each node sernet-samba/stretch,now 99:4.9.12-15 amd64 is installed
Yes, I read the documentation. It is strange, that another cluster in
another office configured that way is working perfect ;( The load is not
as high
2020 Apr 30
7
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Hi,
I have to add a second DC to a Zone.
I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host.
The bind refuses to start:
root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9
? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-04-30 14:51:58 EEST; 5s ago
Docs:
2019 Dec 18
0
DNS replication issue
On 18/12/2019 14:07, Ilias Chasapakis forumZFD via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a
> possible tip:
>
> _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com.
>
> output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV
> _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the
2019 Dec 18
2
DNS replication issue
Hello,
We are setting up 2 AD machines:
New machine with subnet 192.168.1.21: Version
4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster Bind version 9.11.5
Existing machine 1 with subnet 192.168.2.21 Version
4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3
Existing machine 2 with subnet 192.168.3.21? Version
4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3
All with BIND_DLZ backend, same
2020 Nov 09
1
ctdb error after upgrade to 4.12.10
Dear Jeremy,
thanks for your reply.
I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the
[global] section?
I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again.
Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it.
Best
Bene
Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via
2019 Aug 23
2
plenty of vacuuuming processes
Hi,
Oh sorry, of course:
The running os is debian 9.9 and I'm running the sernet-samba-ctdb in
version 4.9.11-15
This is my configuration:
[global]
??? winbind refresh tickets = Yes
??? winbind use default domain = yes
??? template shell = /bin/bash
??? idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999
??? idmap config ZFD : backend = rid
??? idmap config ZFD : range = 0 - 200000
??? hide dot
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi,
I don't have the user root.
No changes :( Sometimes a user gets permissions, sometimes not.
This net conf is now running:
[global]
??? winbind refresh tickets = Yes
??? winbind use default domain = yes
??? template shell = /bin/bash
??? idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999
??? idmap config EXAMPLE : backend = rid
??? idmap config EXAMPLE : range = 500 - 200000
??? hide dot files
2020 Nov 09
3
ctdb error after upgrade to 4.12.10
Dear List,
I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9
and did a
gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off
Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access
to a shae.
Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]: [2020/11/09 15:56:14.078120,? 0]
../../source3/lib/popt_common.c:68(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn)
Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]:??
2020 Apr 30
3
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Thanks for the tip. I have still "zone has no NS records"
This is the output (anonymized) of the script -- sorry, I will post it
directly next time ;)
Collected config? --- 2020-04-30-15:25 -----------
Hostname: addc-jor02
DNS Domain: example.com
FQDN: addc-jor02.example.com
ipaddress: 192.168.40.24
-----------
Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample
2019 Aug 29
0
Permission Issue
Hi,
this configuration doesn't make any differenc in daily life. So perhaps
an ID-Mapping problem?
an ldbsearch --url=/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb
shows
dn: CN=Team IT and facilities,OU=HO,OU=example,DC=com,DC=de
objectClass: top
objectClass: group
cn: Team
instanceType: 4
whenCreated: 20180731103742.0Z
uSNCreated: 3631
name: Team
objectGUID: 7a27f859-97dc-4cf8-b4b1-c7b7cfe0f585