similar to: Questions about reverse zone

>No, ALL of your named named.conf files, this includes the ones in >/etc/bind 'named.conf, named.conf.options, named.conf.local, >named.conf.default-zones and finally the one you have posted, but from >before you changed it. > >Can you also answer the question, was bind9 installed before you >provisioned Samba ? >Rowland I have installed BIND9 after installed the

Hai James, An other question, is exchange installed in the windows environment? If not thats only good. Ok you need some rewriting some parts i see several things you need to fix. I'll comment below. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > James Fowler via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 2 mei 2019

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:37:38 -0500 Denis Morejon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi: > > I have two samba 4.7.4 DCs. One of them has problems. I can not use > samba-tool on it. Then, when I try to fix It's database It returns: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >

root at DC2:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8) # and managed by Zentyal. # # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN # nameserver 192.168.1.254 #search domain1.domain /etc/hostname cat /etc/hostname DC2 /etc/hosts root at DC2:~cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost 127.0.1.1

>Was Bind9 installed when you provisioned Samba ? >Why does the first 'named' log line refer to 'dlz_bind9_9.so' ? >Can you post the contents of your named.conf files ? > >Rowland > Hello Rowland root at X200:/etc/bind# cat "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf" # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file

Set auth-nxdomain yes; And stop/start bind9 Other source : https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/ /snap The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows dynamic

Hi, I installed samba4 (zentyal 3.4) and I followed the Samba4 AD DC Howto from the wiki to test the linux-side. There all seems OK. Unfortunately, when I try to register a Win7 PC, the domain is not found. So what can I do to test things on the Windows-side ? I did : C:\net view /domain:ace_domain returns : \\ZENTYAL1 which is my DC After manually "mounting" the test1-share : C:\net

Inline reply. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:08 AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2019 16:51:02 -0400 > James Fowler <fowlerj at adst.org> wrote: > > See inline comments > > > root at DC2:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf > > # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by > > resolvconf(8) > > # and

I joined a Windows 10 Pro system to my (still experimental) domain. The windows system actually hosts DC2 as a VM, and another Windows (Server 2008 R2) at another location hosts DC1 also as a VM. The two locations are connected via a VPN, both systems run only when needed. The windows system does not directly use DC2 for DNS but instead talks to a DNS resolver that delegates the samba Domain to

Hi Banging my head against a wall with this. Dynamic dns updates for windows clients are failing. Log exceprt: Apr 13 00:20:50 server named[30147]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of signer=newboywin7\$\@example.lan name=newboywin7.example.lan type=AAAA error=insufficient access rights Apr 13 00:20:50 server named[30147]: client 192.168.12.205#61162: updating zone 'example.lan/NONE':

Hm, I thought this to be the very TLD that is specifically assigned for local networks with no plans to become Internet-wide. What is the recommended TLD for such networks then? Dňa 20. 2. 2019 o 11:33 Rowland Penny via samba napísal(a): > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:17:05 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hai, >>

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:39:56 +0200 Michal <Michal67M at seznam.cz> wrote: > > /etc/named.conf > > # Global Configuration Options > > > > include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > > > > options { > > > > dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; > > statistics-file

Inline reply. On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:25 AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2019 07:06:42 -0400 > James Fowler <fowlerj at adst.org> wrote: > > > Inline reply. > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:08 AM Rowland Penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2 May

Hai, In addition to Rowlands last mail. I see wrong rights in /var/lib/samba/private You want : drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 May 6 13:06 private Missing bind (named.conf.option) In options { empty-zones-enable no; auth-nxdomain yes; # This server IS authorive for the AD-DC zones. // to use new samba backup onnline tool, you also need auth-nxdomain yes; //

Hi Lucas ? Thanks, but the time is in sync on all clients and is updated on login by a login script. There's is no discrepancy in this regard between those clients that work and those that don't. :) ? On Wed 24-04-2013 10:47:?icro MEGAS <micromegas at mail333.com> wrote Check your time sync between clients and server. If the time is not in sync, it can result to Kerberos errors

I have read that so many times. I started out with the simple, prompted 'samba-tool domain join' and built up from there. Version is: Samba 4.7.6 from Ubuntu (18.04.2) Interesting what happens when I take out --site directive (see below). root at DC2:~# samba-tool domain join DOMAIN1.DOMAIN DC --username='DOMAIN1\EnterpriseAdminUser' --realm='DOMAIN1.DOMAIN'

On 25/05/2019 21:26, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > I have installed BIND9 after installed the Debian operation System new > I take it that means it was installed before the provision ;-) > > samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 > --realm=x.200.caloro.moolgeeks --domain=caloro.m --server-role=dc1 > --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --adminpass=putonepasswordhere. > I take that because

Anybody knows if the Bind version on CentOS 4.4 (9.2.4) has issues with doing reverse DNS for subnets? (networks smaller than /24) I keep a reverse DNS /26 subnet on Bind 9.3.1 (Fedora) and it works fine. I've a /27 subnet on CentOS 4 (bind 9.2.4), exactly the same config just different subnets and addresses, and it does not work. I do a "dig @localhost .......in-addr.arpa. PTR"

On 13/02/15 15:29, Denis Morejon Lopez wrote: > > I tried first all these with linux ldbmodify using that ldif with the > dn:: (code 64) > but an error like the last you will see here occurred. > > Then, I tried with Windows ldifde. > > # The Windows OS is in spanish. That's why I will comment the must > important lines for you (Since my point of view). > >

El 31/07/18 a las 07:35, Rowland Penny via samba escribió: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:37:38 -0500 > Denis Morejon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I have two samba 4.7.4 DCs. One of them has problems. I can not use >> samba-tool on it. Then, when I try to fix It's database It returns: >> >>