similar to: Share inaccessible intermittently and often - restarting smb cures for short time

Ok increased logging and got the error here is what got logged: 2020/04/23 14:03:17.514132, 3] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] status[NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:334 [2020/04/23 14:03:17.514206, 3]

Same here, I had also wrote to the mailing list, 2 Customers has the same issue after upgrading to 4.12 Windows Clients get the error ?another prosscess is in use? or ?wrong handle? when a user try to open a network share. After restart samba it?s working for a little moment but mostly not. We?re using Debian 10 Buster and Samba Version is: Version 4.12.1-SerNet-Debian-5.buster Von: samba

Don?t think we?re the only one with this problem, We use it how I said for 3 Companies and we have this issue at all our customers after upgrade to 4.12, before we never had this problem. Downgrade will solve this problem but stay always on an old version brings in future new problems. We have a sernet subscription but no support package, that?s the reason why I write here. The question is here

Additional Information: This is happening on both a Windows 7 client and a Windows 10 client both of which are joined to the domain. Seems to be some sort of file locking issue but it is happening at the share level - before I even attempt to access or write a file. On a different server running Samba 4.9.2 and a relatively similar setup (same build commands but running on CentOS 7) I do not

Interesting that you're using the sernet packages.. Mine was built from source. I guess we're the only two people on the planet having this issue :). I am going to attempt to downgrade just my file server to a few versions back and see if it starts working. On April 24, 2020 3:55:41 AM David Faller via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Same here, I had also wrote

The thing about us being the only ones was kind of tongue and cheek hence the smiley :) .. and was only because of no response. I will be happy to help where I can providing logs and testing etc.. but I'm no programmer and as such I'm not the person to try and troubleshoot. I would consider myself a user of the product. As far as running on a previous version I'm not too

I just installed version 4.11.7 and the problem has gone away so either it's a bug or a new "feature" that we have to set some config setting to fix. I am still having the annoying issue with deleting thumbs.db files which I currently have on the other install as well. I'm not sure why there is a locking issue with these files but every time I try to delete a folder I get an

Sorry it defaulted to sending direct to you - here it is to the list. > OS is CentOS 8 > > I was thinking about the possibility of using the version in the base repo for > the file server since I don't need ADDC for the file server. I just need the > ability to join. > > Here is my configure command that I used to configure the source: > > ./configure \ >

>> After mapping the Administrator of the domain, as root on unix, the >> Administrator lost access to sharing the fileserver. When trying to >> access the system asked for authentication but does not authenticate. >> When I comment the following line in smb.conf, the share opens >> normally: >> >> username map = /etc/samba/user.map >> >

On 28/03/2023 17:41, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 3/28/23 08:40, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 28/03/2023 15:50, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 3/28/23 07:36, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28/03/2023 15:08, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>>>>

Hi, I don't have the user root. No changes :( Sometimes a user gets permissions, sometimes not. This net conf is now running: [global] ??? winbind refresh tickets = Yes ??? winbind use default domain = yes ??? template shell = /bin/bash ??? idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999 ??? idmap config EXAMPLE : backend = rid ??? idmap config EXAMPLE : range = 500 - 200000 ??? hide dot files

Hello, We had a strange thing happen today - we shut down our system (virtual machines) so that some work could be done in the server closet and everything was shut down gracefully but when everything was started back up I can no longer access my file server from windows. I get the following message in windows: \\fs1 is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network

Been using Samba since the early days and it's always worked terrifically. Install it from RPM or apt or yum, make a few tweaks to the smb.conf and I'm off and running without fail. So to run into a situation where I'm getting denied has really stumped me. I dialed up logging to try and get a peek into what's failing and things start falling apart around NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:53:33 -0300 Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com> wrote: > >You say you have compiled Samba yourself, so I take it that Samba is > i>nstalled at /usr/local/samba, if so, is the new samba in your PATH > i>and > >are there any OS Samba packages installed ? > I compile myself. I removed all packets for samba before start the >

Hello, First of all : Happy New Year to you all :-) I need your help for a problem. I've 2 servers on CentOS 7: a Samba DC+AD and a Samba Files Sharing. In the Samba file sharing server, all data is store in a RAID Disk partition wich is mounted in /data/ (fstab : UUID=a47ea879-7072-4e8f-a668-3f5a86e58ef2 /data ext4 defaults,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1?? ?1 2). Under Windows each user has

Using the latest SerNet 4.8.1 build, I'm seeing users being unable to write into newly created shares until smbd is restarted. Here's the relevant log part: [2018/06/14 16:04:29.229329, 5] ../source3/smbd/filename.c:662(unix_convert) unix_convert begin: name = New folder, dirpath = , start = New folder [2018/06/14 16:04:29.229375, 5] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1458(check_reduced_name)

Hi, yes, I did. I get the same results with "getent passwd testuser" on each node. /etc/ctdb/nodes and /etc/ctdb/public_addresses is exactly the same on each node On each node sernet-samba/stretch,now 99:4.9.12-15 amd64 is installed Yes, I read the documentation. It is strange, that another cluster in another office configured that way is working perfect ;( The load is not as high

I'm desperate. My English is terrible, but I will try to be as clear as possible. I have Samba 4.4.4 in a Centos 7. I have many connections for each ip. The command smbstatus -b returns me infinity of these: Samba version 4.4.4 PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing

Hi, I've a big problem with my shares on a domain AD member server. On this server there is severals shares directories : - \data\dir1 [share_one] - \data\dir2 [share_two] - \data\dir3 [share_three] \data is a mounted partition when I browse one of my share in windows, \\myserver\share_one for exmple, I can see all directories of my server !! : bin, boot, dev, lib, ..... data directory

2017-04-21 1:08 GMT-03:00 Epsilon Minus <theepsilonminus at gmail.com>: > 2017-04-21 0:38 GMT-03:00 Epsilon Minus <theepsilonminus at gmail.com>: >> >> >> I'm desperate. My English is terrible, but I will try to be as clear as possible. >> >> I have Samba 4.4.4 in a Centos 7. >> >> I have many connections for each ip. >> >>