similar to: CTDB and locking issues reloaded

On 16/04/2020 11:12, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 4/16/20 um 10:42 AM schrieb Giuseppe Lo Presti: [...] >> the other locking settings? In particular: >> >> ? posix locking = no >> ? strict locking = no >> ? oplocks = no >> ? level2 oplocks = no >> ? kernel oplocks = no > > that depends on your use case. If you sharing SMB only

On 15/04/2020 16:57, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 4/15/20 um 10:59 AM schrieb Giuseppe Lo Presti via samba: >> So the question is do you acknowledge the correct behaviour should be to >> prevent the second client from getting the lock? > > yes. My bet: your cluster filesystem device nummer differs across nodes. Cf: Bingo! Indeed inodes are (obviously) identical, but

On 15/10/2020 09:46, Ralph Boehme wrote: > Am 10/15/20 um 9:30 AM schrieb Giuseppe Lo Presti via samba: >> Anyone knowing what happened at the time within samba-technical (if it >> can be disclosed)? > > iirc I tried to look into this offlist with the OP and actually spent > considerable time back then trying to reproduce the issue, but couldn't. > > I can't

On 13/10/2020 23:00, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:16:31PM +0200, Giuseppe Lo Presti via samba wrote: [...] >> As the mentioned thread seems to have been moved to the samba-technical >> mailing list, was there any conclusion reached? In particular, we?re looking >> for suggestions on possible reconfigurations (if any!) of our Windows >> clients, as

Hello Samba experts, I'd like to revive an old thread from 2017, where a performance regression of the Windows client implementation of SMB was discussed (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-August/210366.html). We run a ctdb-managed cluster of Samba gateways to our distributed file system, and we have performed similar tests with the latest production Samba 4.12 release, using

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

Hello everyone, I have a question regarding building the Rmysql packages from source in Windows. I am currently using: Windows XP, R-2.2.0, Mysql 3.23 I have installed all of the tools from Installation and Administration and after following all the instructions to the letter, I compiled the binary and installed R 2.2.0 from source with no issues. This is the first time I have compiled the

Before we start accessing a huge (> 16 TiB) OCFS2 volume, we need to confirm that its journal supports 64-bit offsets. So we need to check the journal's feature bits before recovering the journal. This is not possible with JBD2 at present, because the journal superblock (where the feature bits reside) is not loaded from disk until the journal is recovered. This patch loads the journal

Dear Amy, Same question here: do you accept remote applicants? Best Regards, Samuel On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:43 AM, M?rti?? Liberts <martins.liberts at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Amy, > > I have the same question as Mark. Is it possible to work from abroad - > remotely? > > > Best regards, > Martins > > > On 6 January 2015 at 19:32, Mark LoPresti

I have released SYSLINUX 2.10-pre2. I *really* would like testing reports for this one, especially ISOLINUX, since I've included Knut Petersen's fix for Award BIOSes... Changes in 2.10: * MEMDISK: Handle images compressed with zip as well as with gzip. Some Windows-based image tools apparently generate these kinds of images by default. Patch by Patrick

OK, have repeated the test: - samba logs: http://www.mediafire.com/file/jy4qcyvqg6z39zu/logs.tar.gz/file - tcpdump log: http://www.mediafire.com/file/qzex3kxf2vzd87n/tcpdump_all.tar.gz/file The tcpdump log covers the whole period of testing time, from starting to stopping smb and nmb services. Previous logs deleted from mediafire. Now waiting for any advice from you, or let's

Dear Amy, I have the same question as Mark. Is it possible to work from abroad - remotely? Best regards, Martins On 6 January 2015 at 19:32, Mark LoPresti <marklopresti at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Amy, > > one key question: can this position work remotely? > Thank you, > Mark LoPresti > From: "Heyman, Amy (ESS)" <Amy.Heyman at fao.org> > To:

Linus, et al, Here are the ocfs2 changes for 2.6.37. There are three major additions. Tao Ma has added readahead to our CoW operations. Sunil Mushran has added a global heartbeat mode, allowing one device heartbeat to support multiple ocfs2 mounts. Finally, Patrick J. LoPresti has done the final work to enable ocfs2 mounts on devices larger than 16TB. The ocfs2 disk format has always

Hi all, I'm trying to run a program off a network drive, however it insists on locking the DLL files it loads, so that no other process can access them (even read-only.) This means that only one person can run the program at a time, as opposed to the entire office running it at the same time. It looks like the option "share modes = no" will solve this, but before enabling it for

Alex, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still > open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually > open it on the same host without any problems: I don't see where you're opening the file twice from one smbclient below. Am I missing something? And then there's no

I am running Samba version 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6. When I run smbstatus, it coredumps. Here is some detailed information that may help in killing this bug. This is a run of smbstatus where it coredumps, and afterwards, a gdb session. root@grads:/depot/samba-2.0.6/bin 174# ./smbstatus Samba version 2.0.6 Service uid gid pid machine ----------------------------------------------

Hello! I sent this message to samba-technical yesterday but as I saw no response (not even a RTFM ;), I'm crossposting. I just need some help to track down this bug. I can write a patch if I can find the guilt... ----- Forwarded message from "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@conectiva.com.br> ----- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:34:41 -0200 From: "Luis Claudio R.

Did you note the very second you saw the offending error message? That time would help a lot, I can't see the error packet. But all that said, I'm not the person who needs to look at this, I just hoped I could help get you the information they would need. The only other suggestion, other than the build on master in the hope this has already been fixed, is if you do find you can build

This is the smbstatus with 4.11.x. No problems on clients. Using LC_ALL=C because have Polish locale set up. [root at arch1 ~]# LC_ALL=C smbstatus Samba version 4.11.3 PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing

On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 23:18 +0200, pavlos wrote: > @Andrew, > > Samba master - what do you mean? A clean compile and install from > genuine samba.org sources? As a matter of fact, I was thinking about > it.... Yes. > Let me do the tests now, with tcpdump. Will send some logs > and outputs later on. > > You've asked previously - this is the smbstatus, already on