similar to: Change SOA Record

Hi, after installing a samba-4.8.9 AD-Server there is/are an A-Records created for the domain delivering the ip-address(es) of the AD-server. This ip can be changed vie "samba-tool dns update" but after restarting the AD-server the ip-address of the server will be added again. Can this be prohibited or is this necessary to the functionality of the AD-server. Thanks! -- Dipl.-Ing.

Hi, I've detected a very strange behavior on samba 4.8.9 and 4.10.6. After setting a new password for a user with samba-tool the old password remains valid. The user can use both passwords. After setting the third password become the first password invalid: :~ # samba-tool user setpassword extisadm --newpassword=12AbCdEf Changed password OK :~ # samba-tool user setpassword extisadm

Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2019, 14:13 +0100 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 03/10/2019 13:43, Dipl.-Ing. P?ter Varkoly via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after installing a samba-4.8.9 AD-Server there is/are an A-Records > > created for the domain delivering the ip-address(es) of the AD- > > server. > > This ip can be changed vie "samba-tool dns

Hi, I want to join samba 4.10.13 to an Win2k16 Server as member. The join was succesfully: net ads join -U administrator Using short domain name -- CRANIX Joined 'ADMIN' to dns domain 'cranix.win' wbinfo -u lists all users. But wininfo -u <username> delivers following error: wbinfo -i administrator failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for

Hi! I'm using 4.10.13 as AD and have the issue that winbind does not show correct the group membership of some users. # Global parameters[global] ldap server require strong auth = no netbios name = admin realm = XXXX.LOKAL workgroup = XXXX dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = Yes

Am Montag, den 16.03.2020, 15:17 +0000 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > > After deciphering the above, Sorry. evolution has reformatted my text :-( > it is a known feature, only when a user > logs in can you be sure to get a full list of the users groups. Very strange. I've recreated a new user and put it in all groups and he was inmediately in all groups. What does mean to

What is the compatibility level of samba-4-10.13? When I try to replicate Win2k12RC2 or Win2k16 I got everytime the error:DsAddEntry failed with status WERR_ACCESS_DENIED info (8567, 'WERR_DS_INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION') Thanks a lot. -- Dipl.-Ing. P?ter Varkoly Greuleinweg 37. D-90411 N?rnberg

Hi all, I am experiencing strange behaviour regarding DNS resolution with my samba-driven AD. This is with Debian-packaged samba on raspberry Pi: # samba -V Version 4.19.5-Debian # uname -a Linux dc3.ad.mydomain.tld 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (2024-01-25) aarch64 GNU/Linux I would expect that every DNS server of the domain would respond with the same SOA record. But

Hello Samba List, I have 2 problems with dns - seeing the child entries and a zone with an extra octet. First... I have created a /16 reverse zone as per the wiki page (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration#To_create_a_.2F24_reverse_zone)... $ samba-tool dns zonecreate dc3 130.130.in-addr.arpa $ samba-tool dns zonelist --reverse dc3 pszZoneName :

Le 27/05/2019 à 09:50, Rowland penny via samba a écrit : > On 27/05/2019 08:28, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located >> on 7 AD sites. >> I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated >> to the last DC that was joined to the domain. >> But this DC is

Hi, We have outdated SOA information in our samba DNS. We used to have a DC1, and it is no more, however it's listed in our SOA records on both remaining DC's. I think this is not correct. I am under the impression that in order to get full failover support, all DC's need to have listed themselves as SOA. This is also what google tells me:

[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca ALL -U administrator Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=3, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=hostmaster.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600) NS:

Thanks a lot! Am 08.05.19 um 17:05 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 8 May 2019 16:16:58 +0200 > Peter Varkoly <peter at varkoly.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> [global] >>         netbios name = admin >>         realm = <LONG-DOMAIN> > I do hope that '<LONG-DOMAIN>' is the dns domain in uppercase Yes it is. > >>

Hi, I'm using samba 4.6.15 and 4.8.9 as AD server on a lot of openLeap 42.3 server. The server have numerous group directories in /home/groups. This drirectory will be provided by a share: [groups]         comment = Shared directories of groups you are member in.         path = /home/groups         inherit permissions = Yes         inherit acls = Yes         browseable = Yes        

On 11/20/2015 7:40 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 20.11.2015 um 11:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >> Hi Ole, >> >> I'm still not answering your issue but I come back to speak about >> TTL. Perhaps someone would be able to bring us some light on that. >> >> This morning I'm trying to reproduce the way I do broke my test AD >> domain. This

On 11/20/2015 10:17 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2015-11-20 15:11 GMT+01:00 James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>: > > On 11/20/2015 7:40 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > > Am 20.11.2015 um 11:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: > > Hi Ole, > > I'm still not answering your issue

Last month I struggled with a severe DLZ issue and today I could solve it. Credits for the important idea go to Peter Serbe, thanks! I checked the DNS contents using RSAT. There was nothing wrong with SOA nor NS entries, but the reverse zones were actually forward zones with proper names in the in-addr.arpa. domain. I built proper reverse zones and deleted the forward-reverse zones and Bind

Hi Ole, I'm still not answering your issue but I come back to speak about TTL. Perhaps someone would be able to bring us some light on that. This morning I'm trying to reproduce the way I do broke my test AD domain. This leads me to deal with SOA record (I broke my test AD seizing FSMO roles before removing old FSMO owner, SOA was not changed during that process and I suspect this was

Doh forgot to cc -----Original message----- > From:Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org> > Sent: Tuesday 8th April 2014 21:16 > To: G?nter Kukkukk <linux at kukkukk.com> > Subject: RE: [Samba] DNS record info (samba-tool) > > Brilliant, glad about that as zones pretty much done on set up and no worry about a restart. > > Great that adding

Hi I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located on 7 AD sites. I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated to the last DC that was joined to the domain. But this DC is located on one of the remote sites. Is this behavior normal or would it be better if I updated this record via "samba-tool dns update" to point it to one of my 3 main