similar to: Fwd: ACL problem

Is there plans to use libwrap Or is there already some kind of access control i have missed?? What i really want is a mechanism so i can say: If The request comes from "123.121.212.0" dont offer ssl and accept plain else demand ssl and no plain I now have this (almost) in another imap server by xinetd and two ip addresses. I could solve this by iptables or access list on the router

I have tried to update openssh-3.1p1 of our system that uses RH7.2 (Scyld). I is pretty much a standard Redhat 7.2 install with openssl-0.9.6b, zlib-1.1.4 etc. I have gotten openssh to work after some initial issues, but I still have not been able to get openssh/sshd to work with tcp-wrappers. I have in hosts.deny ALL: ALL: and in hosts.allow ALL: localhost, 127.0.0.1, 192.168.1. and still I

Hi! I ran into a problem with programs exec:ed by print/acroread8 picking up Linux libraries and thus failed to run. This includes the print program in the print dialogue and the browser configured in edit/preferences/internet. The reason is that the acroread launch script sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH which is propagated to its childs. See this PR:

Hi Lars Thank you for reply. My apologies it is running in "*TAP*" mode. root at tinc-srv:~# tincd -n netname -D -d3 tincd 1.0.23 (Dec 5 2013 17:16:47) starting, debug level 3 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tap mode) I have enabled ip forwarding and it seems that bridging rules is enabled root at tinc-srv02:~# cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables 1 root at

Hi there. I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both network. In the srv02 there is samba version 4.15, which is in the DMZ network 10.10.100.0/24 The first is an additional controller for

Hi I am testing running tinc in switch mode. , my topology is as follows Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -> Site 2 (tinc-srv02) I have configured the bridge interfaces with ip addresses and able to ping between bridges. I then setup a server on each site and tested layer 2 connectivity between the two servers. Topology as follows. Server 1 - *Site 1* (tinc-srv01) -> *Site 2* (tinc-srv02) - Server 2

On Fri, 3 May 2024 15:19:01 +0200 Anders ?stling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I wrote a message a couple of days ago asking about Samba and SMB > protocol levels on an old industrial robot with a pre-2010 Samba. > That was resolved successfully. I now have another question > concerning the same systems (the robots and the new Samba server, > HP-SRV03). >

On Fri, 17 May 2024 12:36:33 -0300 Gilberto Ferreira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there. > I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, > both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. > In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network > 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both >

Hello Yazeed, Am Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:26:55 +0300 schrieb Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com>: > [..] > > *Site 1* > Server -ping- Site 1 (tinc-srv01) - Success > Server -ping- Site 2 (tinc-srv02) - Success > Server -ping- Site 2 - Server 2 - Failure > > > *Site 2* > Server -ping- Site 2 (tinc-srv02) - Success > Server -ping- Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -

I have a setup where a Vista machine that is behind a NAT connects to a Linux (debian) machine to access SMB shares on that machine. The connection is made with VPN using L2TP/IPSec. I have configured the Linux machine to act as WINS server and PPP will give the Vista machine a new IP on the same subnet and also tell Vista that the WINS server is the Linux machine. I have added one share

I wrote a message a couple of days ago asking about Samba and SMB protocol levels on an old industrial robot with a pre-2010 Samba. That was resolved successfully. I now have another question concerning the same systems (the robots and the new Samba server, HP-SRV03). root at hp-srv03:/ *smbclient -L localhost -U administrator* Enter HPLTS\administrator's password: Sharename Type

I have a problem that I am unable to sort out. Maybe someone can assist with advice and troubleshooting. Client computer is Windows 10 Pro with latest updates as of today. Servers are a Windows 2019 Standard (logon and AD server) and a Samba 4.11 running on Ubuntu (domain member. AD account configured with account profile \\hp-fssrv\profiles\<username>. Home directory is mapped to

Running rsync 2.6.8 as daemon on Fedora core 4. Have the following in the rsyncd.conf file... [test] path = /home/test/greenlight # use chroot = true max connections = 3 lock file = /var/lock/rsyncd/test.lock uid = 503 gid = 503 auth users = test incoming chmod = Dg=s,Dug=rwx,Do-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx Uploading a tree from windows with

I'm trying to build 3.0.30 on Alpha/Tru64-4.0G. The configure step works, but make fails when it tries to link smbd: Compiling popt/popt.c Compiling popt/poptconfig.c Compiling popt/popthelp.c Compiling popt/poptparse.c Linking bin/smbd ld: Unresolved: __unsafe_string_function_usage_here_size_t__ gmake: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 This Should Never Happen :) -- that looks like a message for the

I've managed to configure a LVS Cluster to act as a transparent proxy squid farm, with a virtual server as load balancer, and three real servers. Because redirecting packets going to port 80 to port 3128 of squid in the load balancer doesn't works, the solution has a mix of ip route and iptables. Here is the script I wrote to configure transparent proxy. #!/bin/bash #Transparent proxy

The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results under Intel Darwin9 are appended below. Jack Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:

Using the proposed patch for enabling the i386 multilib under the x86_64-apple-darwin build... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-August/025040.html the following gfortran testsuite results are obtained... Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin10 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:

Building llvm 2.3 and llvm-gcc4.2-2.3 on Mac OS X 10.5, I am seeing the following failures remaining in the gcc 4.2.1 gfortran testsuite... LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL:

Building the prerelease of llvm-gcc 2.4 on Intel darwin9 with the following patch... --- llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c.org 2008-10-30 18:55:45.000000000 -0400 +++ llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c 2008-10-30 18:57:29.000000000 -0400 @@ -157,3 +157,27 @@ { gcc_assert(0); } + + +bool cvt_utf8_utf16 (const unsigned char *, size_t, unsigned char **, +

Hi all again, llvm is failing the 2006-11-30-NoCompileUnit and 2006-11-30-Pubnames tests on me. -m32 and --disable-multilib didn't change the outcome. Did I get the command wrong? I tried jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$ CFLAGS=--multilib make check See below for a transcript of the failed check. What next? Regards, Jo -- snip -- jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$ make check llvm[0]: