similar to: Path length problem?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Path length problem?"

2017 Aug 20
3
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time
> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) >>> Joseph
2017 Nov 06
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:37:11 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 5 Nov 2017, at 12.55, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: Sorry to say this setup works flawlessly for years. The only > > addition we will make now is to do the delivery with dovecot-lda. > > Everything else (including multiple dovecot pop/imap
2009 Jul 27
3
mtime handling seems generally buggy for directories
Hello again, as stated earlier there is a problem with mtime setting on directories during healing in replication setup. Today I tested 2.0.5 and found out that the handling is more or less generally buggy for directory mtimes. Simply try this: untar some kernel archive on your local disk and look at the mtime of the created top directory. now untar the same archive on an exported gluster fs and
2017 Nov 03
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:53:47 +0200 (EET) Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On November 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM Stephan von Krawczynski > > <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical > > hosts. They share the mail data via an external storage.
2017 Nov 06
3
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:50:16 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > wrote: > > Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be disabled we > > would implement a new param for
2017 Nov 05
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 10:44:25 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 4 Nov 2017, at 10.31, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 > > Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> Again that does not answer my question why? Why do you want all the
2017 Nov 20
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:40:55 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 21.33, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Me again have to stress that our former implementation of the lda process > > did do exactly nothing to all the dovecot files, and everything worked > > pretty well. We had no problems
2017 Nov 03
3
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
Hello, we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical hosts. They share the mail data via an external storage. Now we would like to use dovecot-lda on the smtp host, so we wonder if the lda binary works without starting dovecot from init. As there will be no POP3/IMAP usage on this host it seems unnecessary. Nevertheless we cannot judge if it is still needed for
2013 Apr 08
5
How to see folders/subfolders/emails through imap
Hello all, I am trying to do something very simple - at least thats what I thought. I have some fs, it contains folders and subfolders with email files ordered like maildir. Now I try to set up dovecot on top simply to let some imap account watch these email files. But I cannot see any folders at all. I can create new folders and see them, but I cannot create subfolders as subdirs like
2016 Mar 13
3
NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote: > On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > zfs set sync=disabled ? > > Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure. I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you shouldn't host email services anyway. -- Regards, Stephan
2017 Aug 20
6
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) > Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >> >>>> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >>>> written in pure
2017 Nov 07
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:19:23 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 9.15, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > > > >> mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > >>
2017 Nov 04
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> > >> While it might be possible to disable all the other services except > >> master I must ask why? How would the users be accessing their mails then? > >> > >> Sami > > > > Hello Sami, > > > > you did not read my first post. We
2017 Nov 20
1
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > > which dovecot does. >
2023 Mar 08
1
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
On 08/03/2023 17:09, Fabrizio Rompani via samba wrote: > > yes , after join completed . > error is trigged with the command : > > root at landc:~# samba-tool drs showrepl --summary > There are failing connections > Failing outbound connections: > CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=lan > Default-First-Site-Name\NEXTCLOUD via RPC > DSA object
2017 Nov 07
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > > don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's > boxes though > > eg: > > mail_location = > maildir:/var/vmail/%Ld/%1Ln/%1.1Ln/%2.1Ln/%Ln/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY > > --
2023 Mar 08
2
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> A: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Cc: "Rowland Penny" <rpenny at samba.org> Inviato: Mercoled?, 8 marzo 2023 17:01:34 Oggetto: Re: [Samba] Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) Please do not 'cc' me or
2024 May 27
2
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Hello Samba Team, I hope someone with more expertise than me can englighten me to the following "problem": I'm on my way to implement Nextcloud LDAP Authentication against my existing Samba Active Directory via the LDAP Auth Plugin in Nextcloud. I have had trouble with the configuration of the Auth-Plugin in Nextcloud because it could not bind to the ldap directory. After some
2017 Sep 19
7
CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma
Hi, I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS server is confronted with a version dilemma. 1. CentOS 7 sports PHP 5.4, which has
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Am 27.05.2024 17:46, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 27 May 2024 17:27:30 +0200 > Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > wrote: > >> Am 27.05.2024 16:25, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> > On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:57:52 +0200 >> > Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba >> > <samba at