similar to: Samba 4.10 / CentOS 7

Ok Thank you Andrew So I assume it is reasonable to install all packages listed for the CentOS8 in a CentOS7 server , I already have EPEL repo configured. Our Samba 4.9 AD DC is source compiled and I would like to upgrade by compiling and installing 4.10 . So my other question is : is it possible to have python3 and python2 live together on the same server ? Thanks Le mar. 31 mars 2020 ?

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020, henri transfert via samba wrote: > Ok Thank you Andrew > > So I assume it is reasonable to install all packages listed for the CentOS8 > in a CentOS7 server , I already have EPEL repo configured. Don't install centos8 packages on an centos7 system, it would probably break some things. Instead -add- the python3 rpms for Centos7. > Our Samba 4.9 AD DC is

On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a new Centos 7.6 VM that I self compiled 4.10.3 and joined it to an >> existing samba AD domain that has 2 existing DCs. One of the existing DCs is >> running 4.8.7 and the other is running

Hey Rowland, Thanks for getting back to me. I just finished my recompile. I even ran a "samba-tool dbcheck --fix". I still I get this error: samba-tool domain passwordsettings set --max-pwd-age=270 ERROR(<class 'TypeError'>): uncaught exception - unorderable types: NoneType() >= int()   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line

From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: 3/29/2019 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Attempts to Set Max Password Age in Samba Tool Fails On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:46:13 -0500 Matthew Delfino <mdelfino.list.samba at knockinc.com> wrote: > Hey Rowland, thank you for getting

On Mon, 20 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:33 PM <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a new Centos

I'm sorry to I forgot answer appropriate. I'm running CentOS 7 with all packages upgraded. I've followed instruction in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba with some need modifications (yum line is bellow this text) and I've installed python 3.4. I've installed Bind9 from package manager where Bind9 version is 9.9.4. YUM command to

UNOFFICIAL Hi, I'm trying to build samba-latest on CentOS 7. The PC is not online, so I have to download everything manually. Most of the prerequisites are on the CentOS Everything ISO so I don't have to download a lot. I installed all the documented dependencies and configure complained about python3. So I downloaded and installed python36-libs-3.6.8-1.el7.x86_64.rpm

On Mon, 20 May 2019, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 20 May 2019, Tom Diehl via samba wrote: > >> On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> Well OK maybe I should have said self compiled using the instructions @ >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Build_Samba_from_Source#configure and >> the package list from >>

Hello! I am on Samba 4.10.0, Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS. I recently reset a password and found that my password expiration had somehow gotten set to 400 days. I went to one of my DCs and ran the following command: # samba-tool domain passwordsettings show Password informations for domain 'DC=samdom,DC=mydomain,DC=com' Password complexity: on Store plaintext passwords: off Password history

Hi, When I use "samba-tool user syncpasswords" in Samba 4.10.11 (and earlier version of 4.10), I get a python exception coming from a place in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/user.py I could fix it with this patch: diff user.py.orig user.py 2001c2001 < reply = sync_command_p.communicate(input)[0] --- > reply =

Hi, I'm trying to build Samba from source on a RHEL version 8 server. I installed all the necessary packages and untarred the source for Samba version 4.6.10. In the past I have been able to successfully build and install Samba version 4.13.17 on a RHEL version 7 server with Python2. Here I believe I am using Python3, but I cannot seem to get past the configure command: [root at v2ecsqapp09

Hey Rowland, Thanks for the reply. I was not aware of that page but that's super helpful. Unfortunately it does not fix my problem. I think I'm missing something basic. At this point I'm just trying to rebuild the centos7 srpm. See the attached error message (configure fails). Thanks, Greg On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:30 AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>

On Tue, 21 May 2019, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 21/05/2019 01:11, Tom Diehl via samba wrote: >> >> Here's where I disagree. When you run ./configure, make and make install >> everything gets put into /usr/local/samba by default. It is not installed >> over top of any system components. >> >> Not that I recommend this as a standard practice

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:43 AM Gabriel O. Franca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Good morning people, > > I am opening my lab with version 4.10.2 in centos 7.6. > I'm trying to compile using python3 without success. > Has anyone managed to compile using python3 in the centos 7.6 that might > give way to the stones? > Here is the error message

On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" > nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the > buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are > mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:41 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> > wrote: > >> It sounds like you ran into a bug in the test infrastructure's code to >> determine if python3 is supported. Fixing that might be harder, but it only >> needs to be fixed once no matter how

Hi all, Arch Linux (a rolling release distro) has updated to python3 a while back. python2 is still installed in parallel, but part of the ramifications of this move is the following:-0 1. /usr/bin/python points to /usr/bin/python3 instead of /usr/bin/python2 2. /usr/bin/python-config points to /usr/bin/python3-config instead of /usr/bin/python2-config I'm having problems with make for

On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 10:38 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:43 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba > > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

Hi Folks, Now that LLVM 11.0.0 has been released, it's time to prepare for the final step envisionned in the previous RFC named *[RFC] Python 2 / Python 3 status* [0], ie. requiring Python3.6 for LLVM 12.0.0, to be released in 2021. At least Fedora already only ships Python3 and we didn't have much bugs reported wrt. Python compatibility for the LLVM toolchain. Indeed, all Python scripts