similar to: pdc emulator dns record missing after transferring role

On 18/03/2020 11:25, Alex via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Samba: 4.12.0 > > During the migration from Windows DCs to Samba DCs, the following issue came up: > after transferring PDC emulator role to a samba DC, the according DNS record > wasn't re-created: > > # samba-tool fsmo show -d 0 | grep PdcEmulationMasterRole > PdcEmulationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

Hello Rowland, >> During the migration from Windows DCs to Samba DCs, the following issue came up: >> after transferring PDC emulator role to a samba DC, the according DNS record >> wasn't re-created: >> > Yes and no (well not in the way you are thinking) > Yes, you are missing the fact that the dns_update_list has this: > # The PDC emulator >

Ok thank you guys for you input.     So we need tot add something here :  cat /var/lib/samba/private/dns_update_list | grep ldap ${IF_RWDC}SRV          _ldap._tcp.${DNSDOMAIN}                               ${HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_RWDC}SRV          _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}                     ${HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_RWDC}SRV          _ldap._tcp.${DOMAINGUID}.domains._msdcs.${DNSFOREST} 

On 15:14:06 wrote Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:22:36 +0200 > > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Ok thank you guys for you input. > > > > > > > > > > > > So we need tot add something here : > > > > cat /var/lib/samba/private/dns_update_list | grep ldap >

Hai,   Im wondering, im missing the  _ldaps._tcp. INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD entries in my dns. Now, before the updates ( badlock ) etc. this wasnt notice i think. But now since im setting up that everything is doing ldaps i noticed this in my squid setup   ( squid mailing subject : [squid-users] ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl problem )   My question is...   did someone resently setup a new AD

We've added an extra DC for redundancy to the Debian based Active Directory. We updated our older smaba version to the current one, and joined a new DC. Then the commands where givven to move all the FSMO roles Which we verified with "samba-tool fsmo show", which showed that all roles are on the new DC. However in DNS all underscore srv records of the AD services still point to the

On 14/04/2023 14:20, Luis Peromarta via samba wrote: > Apologies. Now I get it. Only one SRV record for the PCD emulator. I will delete the other 2. Yes, one PDC_Emulator, one dns record. > > If I transfer the FSMO role will that be updated then ? On a samba AD DC, the samba_dnsupdate script is run at start up and then every 10 minutes, this script uses a file called dns_update_list

Thank you so far. But unfortunately I could not fix the problems. So I decided to start over again at a situation where all the fsmo roles resides on the old controller. Here is a transcript of what I did and the errors reported: The inititial position srv-kb-dc1:~ # samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SRV-KB-PRIMDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-Fi...

On 11/01/2023 18:56, Thorsten Marquardt via samba wrote: > > Am 11.01.23 um 16:24 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> Yes and it shows what I started with, you have two SRV records for the >> PDC_Emulator, delete the old one. >> >> Rowland > > I did and stopped samba on the old server. But my problem remains. I to > can not connect to

Hi Rowland, I'm here at the Microsoft plugfest trying to help a vendor join a Samba AD-DC (I just did a standard local provision on my laptop using the internal DNS server). They fail due to looking for a DNS name of: _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.sambadom.example.com (I provisioned with the standard realm name of sambadom.example.com). Should we be creating this record on provision ? It seems

Hi Alex I've had the same DNS manager issue. I've opened a bug (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14310) and reported on the mailing list (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228772.html) No fix yet. On 18/03/2020 15:43, Alex via samba wrote: > Rowland, > > I've encountered an issue with connecting to the samba DC's DNS service from DNS >

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:04:20 +0200 (CEST) tomict via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > OK, I have checked from Windows and my dns looks like this: > > DC2-| > > |- Forward Lookup Zone > > |- samdom.example.com > > You have much more dc2 entries, I only have 4 from my manual > additions. Your dns setup is the same as the setup that

Hi all, I posted on both mailing as this seems to be (to me) an internal issue. As the 4.3.1 went out I decided to switch my DC from 4.3.0 to this new version. The process was to install Samba 4.3.1 on new systems, joining these Samba as DC, seizing FSMO roles, demote all 4.3.0. The few I tested until now is working except for DNS entries: samba_dnsupdate is not working as it tries to update

On 12/01/2023 10:53, Thorsten Marquardt via samba wrote: > Thank you so far. But unfortunately I could not fix the problems. So I > decided to start over again at a situation where all the fsmo roles > resides on the old controller. > > Here is a transcript of what I did and the errors reported: > > The inititial position > > srv-kb-dc1:~ # samba-tool fsmo show >

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:44:37 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Andrej, > > then it works, but on a "normal" addc it works without "-U ". This is probably because you will be running the command from the RODC on the RWDC. > > One more Question: > When I do a "host -t srv _ldap._tcp.example.net" I only see

"--seize" helped: root at pre01svdeb03:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at RidAllocationMasterRole owner:

Hey, Thank you Louis for this script, I didn't yet took time to dig in but I'll do. I didn't took time neither to perform another test. That should be done today. Anyway I waited for DC synchronisation before posting. I joined my DC and removed the old ones almost at same time then I gave more than 12 hours to my DC to synchronize. Then I tried to understand what happened, I wrote

Hi, We have encountered these timeout issues with Samba 4.7 as an RODC too. We created a ticket about it here : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 One thing is that even after the timeouts got resolved, I still get a weird behaviour with two entries that keeps trying to update themselves when I run "samba_dnsupdate". The call succeeds, but the entries are actually

Rowland, I've encountered an issue with connecting to the samba DC's DNS service from DNS Manager tool (under Windows). It says "Active Directory service is not available". While digging into it, I've found the samba rpc worker throws an error: [pid 18398] geteuid() = 0 [pid 18398] write(3, "[2020/03/18 18:36:21.694834, 2]

Ah i see.. /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab Thats the "old" path.. Your using bind9 you should have: /usr/local/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab dont forget to set the needed rights on bind-dns folder. On road, cant look deeper in it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Rommel Rodriguez Toirac [mailto:rommelrt at nauta.cu] > Verzonden: