similar to: idmap range and xidNumber

On 29/02/2020 16:30, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote: > > You are right, this is used on Unix domain member I know I am right, I put that in the wiki ;-) > > Well on DC I see files owned by unix user with UID=3000000 in > /var/lib/samba/sysvol/, and when I look on the same SYSVOL share from > windows world I see that the file is owned by BUILTIN\Administrator > user

On 29/02/2020 18:15, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote: > > OK, thanks! Does any of them need to be reflected in unix world? Mostly just Domain Users > > ------------- DC -------------------- > [global] > kerberos method = system keytab Please don't set the above on a DC > client ldap sasl wrapping = sign That is the default, so doesn't need to be there > # name

Greetings, All! I've discovered a nasty mismatch in my recently upgraded domain. It seems that a number of builtin groups have mappings in idmap.ldb that overlap with posixAccount mappings in the sam.ldb. Namely, # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ads.example.com/scripts/ # owner: root # group: 544 user::rwx user:root:rwx group::rwx group:544:rwx group:30000:r-x group:30001:rwx

Hi everyone The s4 Domain Users group has xidNumber: 100 and the Linux users group has gidNumber=100. I've been mapping xidNumber <--> gidNumber for s4 posix groups I've added myself, but this causes a name collision for Domain Users. This also has implications on Linux as local users have access to the group owned stuff of Domain users. I've changed the xidNumber in

Thank you very much for clarifying the ID mapping "magic";) > You do not need 'posixgroup', it is an auxiliary objectclass of group, you can add any of the rfc2307 attributes without it. Well, is there any option to remove it? Because "posixgroup" is on every group that was migrated from Samba 3. And I cannot edit this attribute in ADUC (delete button is grayed).

>When you provision a new domain, it is set 3000000, but, seemingly, when you run the classicupgrade it gets sets to a lower number (never actually run a classicupgrade) based on what is in your old domain. > Not sure what to suggest here, do you feel up to sending me (offlist) a copy of your idmap.ldb ? > >Rowland Thank you again, Rowland, for your time. I think that different ID

On 01/12/14 17:46, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 18:25, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>>>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Rowland Penny >>>>>> <rowlandpenny at

On 20/02/15 21:27, Davor Vusir wrote: > > Rowland Penny skrev den 2015-02-19 18:15: >> OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind >> and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. >> Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided >> to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator

On 01/12/14 18:23, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 19:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:46, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 18:25, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: >>>>> On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman

On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Rowland Penny >>>> <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I do what windows does,

On 01/12/14 19:16, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 19:30, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 18:23, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 19:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 01/12/14 17:46, steve wrote: >>>>> On 01/12/14 18:25, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny

I've got this on the backup DC root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000000 while root at bdc:~# ldbedit -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb objectsid=S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 shows correct xid 3000019 and on the primary DC I've got itk at dc:/$ wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000019

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

Hai, Does anyone know more if this is adressed or point me to the bug report? There should be one, but i cant find it. Im finding the following again, tested with samba 4.4.5, now samba 4.5.3. These reports go back to the year 2013. I searched in my mail samba folder for S-1-5-18 The problem. I create a "computer" Scheduled task. Now this task MUST run as : SYSTEM (S-1-5-18)

:-| ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol Em 16-06-2017 13:38, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:19 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D >> >> Yes exist! >> >> ls -ld

17.07.2015, 17:30, "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 17/07/15 12:03, Andrej Surkov wrote: >>  I've got this on the backup DC >> >>  root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 >>  3000000 > > OK, you have problems there, but not what you think. On my first DC > (note I don't have

On 03/07/15 15:18, Ryan Ashley wrote: > The only Unix client I can think of would be the Buffalo NAS. It runs > Samba3 and hosts various shares via SMB. DNS is handled by BIND9 on the > Samba4 DC. DNS does work and the domain name resolves to the IP address > of the server. DHCP is also handled on the DC. As for the GPO's, they're > in the correct place as far as I can tell.

On 02/07/15 16:55, Ryan Ashley wrote: > Rowland, here is what I found in the ldb. > > # record 68 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > cn: S-1-5-32-544 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-32-544 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 3000000 > distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > > # record 70 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-549 > cn: S-1-5-32-549 > objectClass: sidMap >

I forgot about ldbsearch. Here is a dump of xid numbers. root at dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber xidNumber: 3000028 xidNumber: 3000013 xidNumber: 3000033 xidNumber: 3000003 xidNumber: 3000032 xidNumber: 3000023 xidNumber: 3000019 xidNumber: 3000010 xidNumber: 65534 xidNumber: 3000031 xidNumber: 3000022 xidNumber: 3000026 xidNumber: 3000017 xidNumber: 3000027

OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator from idmap.ldb and restarted samba. Before restarting samba, I checked a few things, on the DC, getfacl returned this for