similar to: Pc's not added (shown) to AD after remove and re-add.

Hai Rowland, samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --tombstone-lifetime=1 Removed 37 objects and 13 links successfully :-) Your the man.. again.. :-) Why o why did i not check : samba-tool domain tombstones expunge -h Thank Rowland for re-freshing my mind. ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >

On a particular DC, running 'samba-tool dbcheck' produces the following:     NOTICE: found 2 expired tombstones, 'samba' will remove them daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that immediately. When I run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' the following is produced:     Removed 0 objects and 0 links successfully Running 'samba-tool

>> Did you think to run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --help' ? No, I didn't, I just assumed that the message "'samba' will remove them daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that immediately" would mean exactly that :-). It worked now. Thank you!

Hello, I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing dangling forward link' errors. samba-tool domain tombstones expunge ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - 'module' object has no attribute 'time' File

Quoting Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Quoting Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>> samba-tool's dbcheck finds only two errors in cn=Configuration, but it >>> does not repair them.  These appear to be references to an original, >>> long since demoted, DC.  But these values appear in neither the

[2017/09/28 03:46:51.256663, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:2730(kcctpl_get_spanning_tree_edges) ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:2730: failed to run Kruskal's algorithm: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [2017/09/28 03:46:51.256953, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:3283(kcctpl_create_connections) ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:3283: failed get spanning tree edges:

On 10/26/2016 12:11 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:41:23 -0400 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone >> records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing dangling >> forward link' errors. >>

Hello you all, with the new samba version out that fixes some problems with dns scavenging I have decided to try this feature. I was specifically interested for our reverse zone (PTR records) We have one zone for VPN clients 8.0.10.in-addr.arpa. I activated the feature in the smb.conf as well as in the Windows DNS manager. Entries are deleted (not visible in DNS manager) after a while. You can

On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 08:50:38 +0200 gizmo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Cleaned the DNS manually with the DNS application, but still I > > can't join. Same error. > > I thought it was the same error, but now I saw there is a small > difference. It seems like a deleted object causes the problem. > With "ldbsearch --cross-ncs --show-deleted

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:11:55 +0000 Peter Mittermayer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > So, without doing a fresh install on the system the join succeeded > with 4.14.9. What does it mean? > In the end I want to end up with a much later version which is still > getting security fixes. > > I went through the readme of CVE-2020-25717 as mentioned but did not

Try this maintenance procedures and report back: http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:dc-maintenance ?? ?Find and delete ?tombstone? items samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --tombstone-lifetime=0 ?? ?Check domain databases and automatically fix things. samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes On 12 Oct 2024 at 18:53 +0100, Carlos Jesus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>,

On 10/16/2017 11:13 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:17 +0200 > mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am >> trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done >> >> ldbedit -e nano -H

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 20:14:12 -0500 Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 14:39 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams via samba > wrote: > > Adding a Windows2008RC to an SerNET S4 4.5.3 (forest level 2008R2) > > domain hangs at replication CN=Configuration received 1630 out of > > approximately 1663 objects. > > Only

Dear list, in this corona crisis a delivery of a AD to a location abroad takes longer than I expected. I demoted the AD which is in delivery with samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=ADDC3 If I know trigger a samba-tool drs showrepl I still see him in the list: CN=Configuration,DC=example,DC=com ??? NTDS DN: CN=NTDS

On 24/07/2019 17:05, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/07/2019 16:01, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> samba-tool dbcheck >> ERROR(<class 'KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' >> ? File >> "/opt/samba/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", >> line 185, in _run >> ??? return

Hello Folks, I just upgraded from 4.1.13 to 4.6.2 (CentOS 6.8, x86_64) and I'm getting this error: /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix Checking 7931 objects ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=d05db3d2-6378-4e97-9f7c-c1bae8bccec2,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=foo,DC=bar,DC=ca -

Hello, I've posted about this issue some time ago, but I maybe didn't explain myself enough and/or didn't supply enough information. My setup is centos 7.5 samba 4.8.4 AD DCwith BIND as dns backend. I noticed that some windows clients stopped doing secure dns dynamic updates because of insufficient rights error. Upon further digging I realized that all of the entries, that were

This is almost certainly because of a build artifact. python/samba/netcmd/time.py was renamed to nettime.py but there is likely to be a time.pyc file floating around in your directories. The reason it was renamed was so that the samba tool time command wasn't confused with the python time module, but this necessarily causes issues with existing installs unfortunately. The fix is mostly

On 20/09/2020 00:30, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > hi, > > I listed the 0ADEL entries with the command below and didn't find the > object. > # ldbsearch --cross-ncs --show-deleted -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb | > grep "\0ADEL" > > I tried to delete using the command below, but it says it doesn't exist. > # ldbdel -H

On 24/07/2019 18:07, Carlos via samba wrote: > Hi! > > After change file > /opt/samba/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/dbchecker.py , dbcheck > was ok > > Output log: > > checking 2407 objects > NOTE: old (due to rename or delete) DN string component for > lastKnownParent in object CN=RID > Set\0ADEL:4faaeabf-54f9-4997-a2cf-a27d034ba524,CN=Deleted >