similar to: Internal DNS, update of reverse zone fails

On 17/02/2020 10:24, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 17/02/2020 08:42, kaffeesurrogat wrote: >> Dear Rowland, >> >> Yes, I did. I'm reading a lot. Docs, books, ... Updates of the >> dns-server via DHCP is up and running, both for the reverse lookup zone >> and the forward lookup mechanism. I've set the lease time to a very low >> value to make

On 17/02/2020 10:01, kaffeesurrogat via samba wrote: > > On 17/02/2020 10:24, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 17/02/2020 08:42, kaffeesurrogat wrote: >>> Dear Rowland, >>> >>> Yes, I did. I'm reading a lot. Docs, books, ... Updates of the >>> dns-server via DHCP is up and running, both for the reverse lookup zone >>> and the forward

Dear List, again a problem I'm not able to solve. I've been trying to add a test user. Since it is a testuser I'm going to delete quite soon, I've wanted to use a simple password without any complexity. Not knowing it better, I wanted to change the default group policy object of my domain using rsat. First thing I've noticed, that it was completely empty. Not a singe rule or

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

Hello All, I've just installed the new samba 4 from git. the version is: Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-8287938 My system is centos 6.3. I was following the Samba4/HOWTO, but when I reach the?Testing/Debugging Dynamic DNS Updates?level, and run?/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names, it failed with: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Failed nsupdate: 2 Calling

Hello everybody, I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS; - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as DC to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End; - *king* has updated dns zones and

I have a dc configured to use the samba internal dns service. The version of samba I am using is 4.10.15 packaged for FreeBSD. Its build options state this: BIND911 : off BIND916 : off , , , GSSAPI_BUILTIN : on GSSAPI_MIT : off LDAP : on . . . NSUPDATE : off My smb4.conf file contains this: [global] bind interfaces only = Yes dns forwarder =

Dear Samba-List, i'm new to the list and new to samba. Right now I'm trying setup a samba ADDC serving around 50 Windows 10 clients and a couple of linux clients. My ADDC Host has two NICs, eth0 should be connected to the wan - network, eth1 should be connect to a 10.* network, serving the windows and linux clients. The ADDC is up and running, serving only the 10.* network. I

On 10/12/15 14:00, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> Is it possible that kdc server is always the SOA, at least if >>> derived from DNS and not specified *explicitly* in the krb5.conf? >>> >>> In my DNS-Manager console I find that >>> >>>

On 1/2/2018 1:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> A few other observations while attempting to switch. >> >> * I do not have a dns.keytab file. Should I or is created after >> attempting to switch? > See my earlier post about samba_dnsupgrade. >

On 05/04/16 20:23, Rowland penny wrote: (I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its mailing list and got no answer...) >> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND? > > What do you mean '*in alternative*' ?? I mean when I build Samba port, I can choose NSUPDATE *or* BIND99 *or* BIN910 (where "or" means "exclusive or",

I am trying to setup dynamic updates with bind_dlz backend, but for some reason if any windows client or linux with nsupdate tries to remove AAAA record, server just 'cancelling transaction', while A and PTR records (both on reverse ipv4 and ipv6) working fine. If i'am remove AAAA record manually via samba-tool or windows mmc then AAAA record can be updated, but after that it again

Hi I know that this has been addressed before but I couldn't find a solution. Summary: when attempting to write a dns record using nsupdate, nothing gets written to the zone due to the error: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Everything is working. We can login to the domain from the same client and we have sssd sending the dyndns update requests which also produce the same

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:38:35 +0100 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, the code from samba_dnsupdate : > nsupdate_cmd = lp.get('nsupdate command') > [....] > cmd = nsupdate_cmd[:] > cmd.append(tmpfile) > ret = subprocess.call(cmd, shell=False, env=env) > > And > $ sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool

I've set up a lab for testing Samba 4.1 as an RODC emulating a satellite office setup, using the sernet packages on SLES11SP2. ## Problem 1 samba_dnsupdate is failing: ==> /var/log/samba/log.samba <== [2013/11/18 13:22:37.416193, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:317(samba_runcmd_io_handler) /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure [2013/11/18

On 1/2/2018 2:23 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:15:11 -0500 > lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1/2/2018 1:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 >>> lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> A few other observations while

"--seize" helped: root at pre01svdeb03:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at RidAllocationMasterRole owner:

Hello Hello I'm using samba4 rc1 since 2 months as PDC with samba4 internal DNS. Everything works but i can't ping domain clinets via its names. Clients are named as stacja00X.localdomain where X is station number. But even on SambaPDC i can't ping it with for exapmle: ping stacja003.localdomain or ping stacja003 nslookup says that there is no host like that. Funny becouse domain