similar to: Samba 4.11.6 cannot JOIN - 'Could not find machine account'

Dug deeper (i.e. into the source code)... no answer yet. The samba join process is failing when fetching the domain's machine password from the secrets.tdb database, which presumably it has just built as part of the JOIN.. Specifically, it is looking for an entry: "SECRETS/$MACHINE.ACC/OFFICE" in secrets.tdb. When that fails, samba looks in secrets.ldb in "cn=Primary

hi gurus My samba upgrade woes: - I have to run 2 instances of samba one for dev and one for UAT. both the instances are giving me hard time after the upgrade. One instance keeps giving me following error: - connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to open the domain client session to machine xxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxxxx.COM. Error was : NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO. [2012/09/04

Well, let's try to be more precise about my issue and give some updates: I try to make a classicupgrade and meanwhile, change the Domain name during the process, which includes realm and NetBIOS domain name. I precisely meet difficulties with changing the NetBIOS domain name. What i've tried so far: 1) Change the NetBIOS domain name "workgroup" attribute on the old Samba 3

On 16/10/2017 18:18, Rowland Penny wrote: > > 'workgroup' is not the netbios name, it is the NetBIOS domain name. > The workgroup should also not have a dot in it, 'DOMAIN.LAN' looks > suspiciously like a dns and realm name. > Indeed i lacked of precision, purpose of the post was more "change NetBIOS domain name during clasicupgrade". DOMAIN.LAN is the

Sorry, I'll try this again. It appears the email got stripped out and left the attachment. ------------------------ I'm having an issue where any machine refuses to join the domain. It's a a Debian server(lenny) with an LDAP backend. I assume the issue is something obvious, but this is an "inherited" network and based on the state of the rest of it, the issue could be

Hi. I joined a fileserver system with Samba version 4.5.12-Debian (fileserv) in an Active Directory domain managed by a Samba 4.6.7-Ubuntu installed on another system using "realm discover" and sssd. The Samba fileserver is correctly joined into the domain and I can correctly browse AD users: root at fileserv:/# getent passwd my.user

Links to reading materials: [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/15/16 [2] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2002.1/10224.html [3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=158174694431737&w=2 [4] http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-chat/2020-February/029090.html [5] https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-February/228348.html [6]

On 05/02/2020 17:51, Roy Eastwood wrote: > Hi Rowland, >> OK, my computer is now running on eth0 and has the two lines in smb.conf and it works. > Let me get this right - with the two lines in smb.conf on your pi: > When using wlan0, smbd fails and core dumps? I haven't tested this on my rpi4 yet, I will though. > When using eth0, smbd starts ok? No, this is what I have

On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 12:47 -0700, Rick Hollinbeck via samba wrote: > Dug deeper (i.e. into the source code)... no answer yet. > > The samba join process is failing when fetching the domain's machine password > from the secrets.tdb database, which presumably it has just built as part of the JOIN.. > > Specifically, it is looking for an entry:

On 28/02/2020 18:01, Georg.Biberger at partner.bmw.de wrote: >> SLES11 is EOL and is python3 easily available for it ? > BMW has extended support from SUSE for SLES11 until end of 2021, so no EOL. > I use phyton2 with "export PYTHON=python2" I thought the extended support was for security updates only and whilst you should be able to build Samba using python2, you need

On 28/02/2020 18:54, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 18:38 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> Is there a way to solve this build issue with Samba 4.11.6? >>> >> Not sure, but even if you can, you cannot use it without python3 >> >> Rowland > G'Day Rowland, > > If the OS only needs to build Samba for a fileserver or a client

well this one got crickets. after a week, it appears there was no call for alarm. Please notify me how I mis-read the release notes. I just don't remember anything about reducing number of database objects. At any rate I am posting this as a note to anyone else who finds the same thing. On Friday, 17 April 2020, 16:42:39 GMT-7, ray klassen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

On 15/05/2020 19:52, James Atwell via samba wrote: > Hello, > > ??????? I upgraded two DC's to 4.12.2 from 4.11.6 before I noticed > authentication issues with a couple Netgear ReadyNAS we have. For > reference I have a total of 6 DC's with 4 running 4.11.6 and two now > running 4.12.2.? I ran the usual ./configure,make,make install from > tar without issues.

On 17/05/2020 16:54, James Atwell wrote: > > Strange results on a domain member > > jatwell at osticket:~$ net ads user info administrator -U administrator > Enter administrator's password: > create_local_private_krb5_conf_for_domain: smb_mkstemp failed, for > file /var/run/samba/smb_tmp_krb5.Bgy6b4. Errno Permission denied > That works for me, but on Devuan (Debian

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.11 release series. Changes since 4.11.5: --------------------- o Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> * BUG 14209: pygpo: Use correct method flags. o David Disseldorp <ddiss at samba.org> * BUG 14216: vfs_ceph_snapshots: Fix root relative path handling. o Torsten

Got past this one.. see below... > > I cannot get bind9 to run now - it fails because bind9_dlz cannot update the reverse lookup > > zone: > Not sure about this, I use dhcp to update the records, but I seem to > remember something about the windows clients needing to be configured to > update the reverse because they do not do this by default. > > > > Feb 15

On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 18:38 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > Is there a way to solve this build issue with Samba 4.11.6? > > > Not sure, but even if you can, you cannot use it without python3 > > Rowland G'Day Rowland, If the OS only needs to build Samba for a fileserver or a client library then the python3 issue doesn't come up, we still allow a build of

On 16/05/2020 14:40, James Atwell wrote: > > On 5/16/2020 5:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 15/05/2020 19:52, James Atwell via samba wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> ??????? I upgraded two DC's to 4.12.2 from 4.11.6 before I noticed >>> authentication issues with a couple Netgear ReadyNAS we have. For >>> reference I have a total

On 15/02/2020 20:08, Rick Hollinbeck wrote: > Andrew and Rowland - thank you for your input. > > I've actually made some progress finally! > > I double checked the items mentioned in this old thread describing solving the same > behavior: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg148337.html > > One little thing was different in my Windows Server's DNS > (which

Recently upgraded my 3 dc's to samba 4.12.1 as part of the install ran dbcheck --cross-ncs on each dc after make install first dc dbcheck reported 5474 objectssecond dc reported 5476 objects last dc (the one with all the fsmo roles, etc.)? reported 1406 objects! now all of them report 1406 objects. (drs replication obviously) ADUC, DNS, GPO manager all seem to have the requisite data. I