similar to: Time machine backups: fruit_tmsize_do_dirent()

Hi I apt installed Samba Version 4.9.5-Debian (latest in their repos) on a fresh-built Raspbian Buster Lite release 2020-02-05. I put together the configuration outlined below by using the docs at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_Samba_to_Work_Better_with_Mac_OS_X and https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_fruit.8.html. The underlying usb hard drive is an ext4 partition

Hi. I try to make backups from one disk to another. I have .sparsebundle[1] directories on the source drive (/Volumes/data/). When rsync reaches the first .sparsebundle it stalls and stays there until i ctrl+c. I'm using OS X Yosemite and rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31 installed via homebrew. However, I had this problem on OS X Lion too using rsync 3.0.9. Actually, the reason I

A new intel-gpu-tools quarterly release is available with the following changes: General changes: - Libudev has been made a mandatory dependency. (Antonio Argenziano) - Documentation changed to refer to the new igt-dev mailing list. (Rhys Kidd) Library changes: - Refactored timer usage for smaller code size. (Chris Wilson) - Various fixes to support planar framebuffers. (Maarten Lankhorst)

I noticed that is if I uninstall an MSI that was installed by Puppet, Puppet does not notice. Looking at the source I see it might be checking for a state file to know whether a package is installed or not: C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\puppet\var\db\package\msi\SplunkForwarder.yml So one has to rememebr to delete that too.... Is this design not a problem? Thanks, Mohamed. -- You received this

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:29 PM, < dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-01-24 03:51, Kevin Korb wrote: > >> Are you rsyncing from one to the other? Both of them to somewhere >> else? One at a time to somewhere else? Why won't you just show your >> actual command line and an ls -li of the correct source and incorrect >>

dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com wrote: > It is exactly as I wrote. On a network volume (A) a "sparse disk image bundle" (B), i.e., a type of disk image used in OS X, is stored. B is then mounted locally (i.e., local to where rsync is run) on a computer (C) where it appears as one of many volumes. > > In other words, B is stored on A. A is then mounted (using

I have been trying for the past few months to set up my raspberry pi to do incremental backups using time machine over Samba since AFP is being deprecated. Also since the latest release of samba (4.8.0) came out with support for time machine I decided to compile it myself and give it a go. The drive is formatted in HFS plus. The main problem that I am having is that even though I can mount the

Really nice write-up on the Samba-based Open Source project ! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! Jeremy.

TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup. I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time

Hi, tl;dr - Samba 4.8.5 broke macOS's Time Machine support (at least for me), patching in the "follow-up patch" from https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13441 makes it work again. It would be great if it could be included in an official patch release soon. :) Just writing about the problem and solution here, in case someone else stumbles upon it. Couldn't find any

Just chiming in here, I haven’t read all the previous posts so may be repeating… Mike Bombich has a good piece on benchmarks for various source/destination scenarios with rsync. https://bombich.com/kb/ccc3/how-long-should-clone-or-backup-take Note that copying to sparsebundle on local media is as fast as to local disk. Sparsebundle is a mac filesystem whereas NAS is not so certain file

So I have the following: define nagios::service ( $nagios_template = ''service-template'', $host_name = $fqdn, $service_groups = '''', $contact_groups = $default_contact_group, $max_check_attempts = 3, $dependency = false, $dependent_host = $fqdn, $dependent_service = '''', $check_command = '''' ) {

Thank you. I will try your suggestions. First I will connect the NAS directly to the computer (Do you recommend USB2 or 1 Gb Ethernet? Or should I daisy chain external HD and NAS? Then it would look like this: Computer <--FW800--> HD <--USB2--> NAS The other option is HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS But I still must say it is weird that

Hey there, to be clear: You've mounted a HFS+ drive on your raspberry pi with rw permissions using fstab. You're able to write files (e.g. as root) on your shares directory without samba, right? As soon as you try to connect Samba using your Mac you haven't any write permissions, right? Have you tried using a Windows machine to connect to your share? Or to disable the Unix

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Really nice write-up on the Samba-based > Open Source project ! > > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ > > Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! > > Jeremy. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this

Dear all; Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to have Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD defaults? I was convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too long ago, but I cannot seem to find it. // Best wishes; Johan

On 2020-09-03 10:43, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 03/09/2020 18:04, Johan Hattne via samba wrote: >> Dear all; >> >> Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to >> have Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD >> defaults?? I was convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too >> long ago, but I cannot seem

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 06:43:32PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 03/09/2020 18:04, Johan Hattne via samba wrote: > > Dear all; > > > > Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to have > > Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD defaults?? I was > > convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too long ago,

Dear all; I'm trying to use winbindd to resolve names in an AD setup. I can authenticate just fine, but I've noticed that for some users "getent passwd" returns a GECOS field populated with displayName from the LDAP servers and for others is does not. For example: $ getent passwd user1 user1:*:1111111111:2222222222:John Doe:/home/user1:/bin/bash $ getent passwd

Dear all; I?m running smbd 4.9.5-Debian and I?m struggling to get Time Machine support to work. The server is running Debian Buster, and the client is macOS High Sierra. I can mount the share just fine on its own, but as soon as I tell Time Machine to ?Back Up Now?, it says ?Preparing Backup,? ?Looking for Backup Disk,? and then nothing. The little red exclamation mark tells me that "The