similar to: AD DC and file server on a virtual machine

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

Hi, i'm currently installing a SLES 12 64bit system. libvirt-client-1.2.5-13.3.x86_64 and libvirt-daemon-1.2.5-13.3.x86_64. Formerly I created my vm's (KVM) using a traditional bridge in my host systems, mostly SLES 11 SP3. But with SLES 12 I don't succeed. I can use the macvtap device in the host, but I like to be able to communicate between host and guest. Is the traditional bridge

18. Juli 2017 16:45, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: > On 07/18/2017 04:31 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I have upgraded all libvirt packages to version 3.5.0-655.1 and restarted host. > > That wasn't necessary. It's not Windows ;-) > >> This is the current default network config: >> ld4004:~

On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 ... > /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be set on eth0 only. > # brctl show > > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces OK, so you don't have a bridge interface. If you want to

On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Bernd wrote: > >> Laine wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On >> Behalf Of >>> Laine Stump >>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM >>> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com >>> Cc: Lentes, Bernd >>>

Hi, I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to hand the entire

hi everyone, so,first it seemed a trivial question to me, but since I could not find anybody being neither able to answer this question nor giving a short config example. after a few sleepless nights and exhausting all the reading and research. here I am sharing my problem with all of you, in the hope of some possible solution/sugestion. or is it that this is impossible?? below my

On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible > to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have > tried works. > > The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest > networking during the install. "All documentation" doesn't leave out this

Hi, this is propably bridge related and not really a xen problem, but it might help someone: Some of our domUs are not able to arp. Arp -n show (incomplete), and doing a tcpdump shows, that on the dom0''s eth0 the arp request goes out, the response comes in, but on the vifX.0 interface the arp response is gone. dom0# tcpdump -ni eth0 arp who-has 10.32.2.51 tell 10.32.7.70 arp reply

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

Hi, see the log below root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu

Hi, I'm not sure what sort of diagram you mean, but I'll have a try. Does this help? It sounds like I need to do something to enable routing on what I've labelled "NIC3" on the diagram - can you please explain what I need to do? [image: Inline image 1] Regards, Phill On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Ajey Gore <ajeygore@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you please drop a

I switch to lollipop 4 months ago and I never had issue. So for my opinion it is ready for daily use. Before try tinc I had my vpn implemented with openvpn, and it works great on lollipop. I switch to tinc because i prefer a mash vpn topology versus a client/server topology. -- Andrea Squeri Inviato con Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno venerd? 27 marzo 2015, alle ore

Hello, I''m trying to configure my desktop as a bluetooth network access point for my ipaq (as explained in http://www.stolk.org/debian/bluetooth.html). I''m running shorewall version 2.2.1 on debian testing with a local network via eth0 and internet access via eth1. I''ve created a bridge br0 for eth0 and bnep0 and activated bridging in shorewall. dhcpd is listening

On 9/6/20 12:02 PM, daggs wrote: > Greetings LAine, > >> When you say "the vm", you mean the one running libreelec, that is >> trying to get and IP address, correct? > > yes, you are correct. > >> I guess Broadcom.home is the IP of the VM that's running the dhcp >> server? (I should have suggested using "tcpdump -n -e -v" :-/)

Hi all, I have done some tests for the new attributes "check" and "type", could you please help to have a check? And I have some questions about the patch, please help to have a look, Thank you! The questions: 1. in step 4 below, the error message should be updated: Actual results: XML error: invalid mac address **check** value: 'next'. Valid values are

Hi I am using Shorewall with a bridged Firewall using the "bridging utils" from Debian. eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the local lan. eth0 and eth1 are both assigned zero addresses and br0 is assigned the Firewall server address of 192.168.0.1 I should point out that Shorewall is working fine in Bridge mode, but I have hit some problems while evaluating

I just see warning? 2016-08-29 11:30 GMT-03:00, Telium Technical Support <support at telium.ca>: > This shows that asterisk's IAX is already bound to all adapters - so that's > good. Symptomatically does your IAX stop working? Or do you just see a > warning? > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com >