similar to: Debuging LDAP queries on Samba AD

On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 13:19 +0000, David Wells via samba wrote: > Hi all! > > I've been working with openldap for many many years and I have found > very usefull to turn debuging all the way on with loglevel -1 in > slapd.conf to be able to inspect in the log the queries being sent to > the server. I am now using samba 4.10.8 as a DC and a general purpose > LDAP server

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 14:21 -0300, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello?Andrew, > > 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is > set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but > when it is at the default log level, it does? I don't have an explanation for this, sorry. ?Have you looked into the 1.5 second queries, what is sending them and

Hello, I followed the instructions at http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/show/HowToUseValidationsWithoutExtendingActiveRecord But now I''m having trouble trying to create my form view. Here''s a brief rundown of what I''ve done: - Created a class called SearchRequest that extends ValidatingBase and saved it in a file called search_request.rb and put it in my models

On 30.10.2015 22:13, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:27:55AM +0100, Stefan Pietsch wrote: >> Dear Samba users and developers, >> >> we had the idea of storing S/MIME certificates in the Samba 4 LDAP. >> In the Windows Active Directory Users and Computers tool I can use the >> "Published Certificates" tab to add a certificate to a user

Hi Rowland, Sorry to inform that none of thus packages solve my problem. But today, with some Tranquil.it helps, I have some news: - Upgrade from 4.11.14 -> 4.12.9 is OK - Upgrade from 4.12.9 -> 4.13.2 : problem is present with Tranquil.it AND Louis package - Fresh install + member join with 4.13.2 is OK (Centos AND Buster packages) Problem only occur when upgrading member to 4.13.2 with

On 05.11.2015 09:18, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:21 +0100, Stefan Pietsch wrote: >> On 30.10.2015 22:13, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:27:55AM +0100, Stefan Pietsch wrote: >>>> Dear Samba users and developers, >>>> >>>> we had the idea of storing S/MIME certificates in the Samba 4 >>>>

I setup a samba4 pdc and successfully added a Windows 2008 machine to the domain. When I start up the "Active Directory Users and Computers" tool, I get a "Naming information cannot be located because: directory property cannot be found in the cache" error. I'm running a pretty up to date version of samba4. The head commit is: commit

Dear Samba users and developers, we had the idea of storing S/MIME certificates in the Samba 4 LDAP. In the Windows Active Directory Users and Computers tool I can use the "Published Certificates" tab to add a certificate to a user account. As Mozilla Thunderbird requests the "userCertificate;binary" attribute of a user when sending encrypted mail, the LDAP response is empty.

On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:32:15 +0100 Ole Traupe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That was weird: didn't see (expect) there to be a discussion right on > the same topic going on at this very moment. > > Ole > > > On 08.02.2017 17:37, Ole Traupe via samba wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > long time no see! :) > > > > I was looking

Samba team, I'm having some problems to have a client Windows XP, I believe all systems could have the same issue, using Ldap authentication with Samba. This is a native OpenFiler configuration with a local LDAP server for Samba shares. The problem is that sharing is never authenticated where my suspicious is about sambaSID. Basically I create a test user called "rlvcosta". This

Hello Samba group, I ran into a problem concerning Dovecot LDAP authentication to the Samba4 Active Directory. Background: I want to install a Openchange+Samba4 environment using Sogo, Dovecot and Postfix. I didn't want to use openldap as described in the Openchange documentation, why should I use 2 LDAP databases? Fedora 17, latest updates applied Samba: Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-813bd03

Hi list, long time no see! :) I was looking for an email reminder script for users whose password will expire. Some of our users are on long travels and will never see the Domain's default notification. I haven't found any complete (and simple) solution online. So I wrote one. In case it helps anyone, you find it below. You should only have to fill in the blanks for the the

Hi, I try to switch from internal DNS to bind9 on an samba-ad-dc (sernet 4.1.23 on debian wheezy). I try to run samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ and get an python error pointing to /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py line 271 Reading domain information Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 261, in

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

Hola: Tengo unos datos con varias fechas y horas como texto (son independientes: las horas no corresponden al día de la fecha). Seria algo como: DATOS <- data.frame(FECHA=c("31/10/2014","23/10/2014", "31/10/2014"), HORA=c("01:23", "12:43", "23:09")) No tengo problema de convertir la fecha para poder realizar

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

On Wed, 30 May 2018 10:33:55 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > So, in AD LDAP lingo, a 'modify' is not atomic, and a 'delete/add' > > > yes? > > Ahem, i meant: > > So, in AD LDAP lingo, a 'replace' is not atomic, and a

Mandi! Rowland penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > If you go here: http://www.selfadsi.org/extended-ad/user-unlock.htm > It says: So, seems to me that 'Lockout-Duration' is an 'unused option'... -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via

On 4/24/2013 8:05 PM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > > Everything. This includes all of the custom lowering code for all of the > targets, all of dagcombine, and maybe all of the patterns in the TD files. I may have missed the discussion, but why are we trying to move away from the SelectionDAG? Are there specific problems that we don't want to fix or live with? If so, what are they?

> The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless > you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: > The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. We just need to set an IP address, subnet mask, gateway, and DNS servers and we will never be changing that configuration ever