similar to: TDB databases on x86_64 and ppc64

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 01:19:18PM +0100, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: > Hi, > > just to be sure: > can I use TDB databases that were created on ppc64 on a x86_64 platform? Yes, the database internal structures are all endian-independent and I believe all persistent database useage within Samba itself is also endian-indepentent. Not the transient databases of course but they get

thanks for caring about this. Ming Xie, are you opening this BZ bug? thanks matthias Am 2017-07-07 um 13:31 schrieb Tomáš Golembiovský: > Hi, > > yes it is an issue in VDSM. We count on the disks being in storage pool > (except for block devices). > > Can you open a BZ bug for that please. > > Thanks, > > Tomas > > > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 02:52:26

This fixes a segmentation fault in the system call's error handling path with dynamically-linked binaries on PowerPC64 little endian. The system call stub wasn't loading up r2 with the appropriate TOC value in its global entry point. The r2 setup code comes from the FUNC_START macro in gcc [1] and an equivalent one can also be found in the LOCALENTRY macro in glibc [2]. On the ELFv2 ABI

I could reproduce customer's problem Packages: rhv:4.1.3-0.1.el7 vdsm-4.19.20-1.el7ev.x86_64 virt-v2v-1.36.3-6.el7.x86_64 libguestfs-1.36.3-6.el7.x86_64 Steps: 1.Prepare a guest which is not listed storage pool # virsh dumpxml avocado-vt-vm1 .... <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/> <source

Am 2018-02-19 um 17:39 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:03:31 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to setup Samba 4.6 on CentOS 7.4 as a Domain Member of a >> Windows 2012R2 Domain Controller with AD. To administer share >> security i have to use the "username

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:09:43 +0100 Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I noticed I didn't ask a question ;-) > I noticed that you didn't give us much to work with ;-) Can you post the smb.conf files from the working ldap machine and the non-working 'tdb' machine. Rowland

hi, i'm trying to import a VM in oVirt from a KVM host that doesn't use storage pools. this fails with the following message in /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log: 2017-07-05 09:34:20,513+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/5) [root] Error getting disk size (v2v:1089) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/v2v.py", line 1078, in _get_disk_info vol =

Build script is based on fedora-aarch64.sh. This managed to build and compress an image, but it seems the process itself is not completely unattended. >From some strange reason I had to manually power off the VM after install. Maros Zatko (1): builder: add build script for PPC64 Fedora builder/website/fedora-ppc64.sh | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97

Hi, I'm building and managing standalone fileservers (security = user) with various passdb backends. I'm noticing different behaviour of Windows ACLs for servers with LDAP and TDB passdb backends. In a LDAP backed server (which I started with) I can freely add filesystem permissions (eg for groups) to objects (files/folders) via the Windows (7) permissions editor. In a TDB backed

On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 22:00 -0400, Samuel F Antao wrote: > Alexey, Alexander, > > Thanks for the suggestions. I tried removing the flag SA_NODEFER but > it didn't do any good... I have been digging into the problem with the > null_deref test today but I was unable to clearly identify the > problem. I suspect that it was either a bug with the calling > convention/unwinding

Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:20:31 AM >

Hello all, I was recently trying out NUMA placement for my guests on both x86_64 and ppc64 machines. When booting a guest on the x86_64 machine, the following specs were valid (obviously, just notable excepts from the xml): <memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory> <vcpu

I'm trying to understand why the buildbot sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 fails due to my latest patch. It was in llvm::GlobalValue while the reported failure is: strcspn-2.c.tmp: /home/buildbots/sanitizerslave1/sanitizer-ppc64-1/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/strcspn-2.c:17: int main(int, char **): Assertion `r == sizeof(s1) - 1' failed. where strcspn-2.c (below) tests the

Patch extracts MSB/LSB info from /bin/file output and passes it as separate parameret from elf_arch. Then it is sent to impl_file_architecture and checked/ Modified magic_for_file to handle regex changes. Now with tests for file_architecture. Fixes: RHBZ#1211996 Maros Zatko (2): inspector: recognize ppc64 and ppc64le archs (RHBZ#1211996) tests: ppc64 and ppc64le for file_architecture

Hi, I just realised that the PPC64 bulddbot is failing because of a rather stupid issue: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1 Just removing the additional assembly file would make it green again. ;) cheers, --renato

On 07/31/2012 11:26 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > On 07/20/2012 10:35 AM, Will Schmidt wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 08:36 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Hi Adhemerval Zanella, the old JIT infrastructure is going away, to be replaced >>> by "MC-JIT" (try passing -use-mcjit to lli). It sounds like you are working on >>> the old JIT, so I suggest

On 07/20/2012 10:35 AM, Will Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 08:36 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Adhemerval Zanella, the old JIT infrastructure is going away, to be replaced >> by "MC-JIT" (try passing -use-mcjit to lli). It sounds like you are working on >> the old JIT, so I suggest you work instead on getting MC-JIT working on powerpc. > Hi Duncan,

Hi Hal, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > İsmail, > > These are self-hosted builds? It seems like a lot of crashes in > llvm::sys::AtomicIncrement. Yes. stage1 clang is used in stage2. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I've been running a samba server with winbind (CentOS 7) as a member of an AD Domain (Windows 2012 R2) for several months without a problem. "Suddenly" I'm seeing the problem that the membership in newly created AD groups isn't correctly visible for some users on the samba server or only after some indefinite amount of time. I'm looking simply at the output of

Hi All, I'm trying to reproduce a failure on llvm-ppc64-linux1 (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/5382) and llvm-ppc64-linux2 builders caused by one of my patches yesterday. Some of the CodeGen/Hexagon tests failed to compile with stack dump problem. I tried to configure and build LLVM for PowerPC on my machine locally but don't see the failures. I had to remove