similar to: Read-only permissions - incorrect user mapping?

When you say “real symlinks on OSX” do you mean an “alias” that Finder would create? Or a Unix-type symlink using the “ ln -s file link” command in Terminal? A Finder alias is not the same as a Unix-type symlink. My NAS runs Debian Linux with version 4.3.11 of smbd; my clients are all OSX Mojave. If I create an alias using Finder on the NAS, it behaves like a normal alias in OSX UNLESS I move

CentOS 8 Samba 4.9.1 Client: macOS 10.14 [global] workgroup = LOCAL log file = /var/log/samba/log.smb max log size = 1000 syslog = 0 server role = standalone server unix password sync = no min protocol = SMB2 ea support = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:aapl = yes readdir_attr:aapl_rsize = yes readdir_attr:aapl_finder_info = yes

Hello I am trying to integrate OS X 10.10.4 clients into existing Samba infractructure run by our IT department. We are currently using Samba 4.2.3. File share is stored on iSCSI array with ext4 filesystem which should support both ACL and XATTR. We are trying to setup vfs_fruit module to avoid possible performance problems on OS X clients. We do NOT user netatalk. Current vfs_fruit config:

Hi. I configured a simple samba server. As I need this server to be available in macOS ?Network? list, I configured avahi. When I start smb.service and avahi-daemon.service I get two results in the ?Network? section. When I don?t use avahi I get no entry. Why are there two entries and which best practice can I use to have only one entry? Thanks! Steven ##################################### cat

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled

I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled the latest Samba 4.3 tarball and enabled fruit per the modules man page, however directory listing performance still takes a few seconds. I've cranked the fruit debug level up to 10 and can see that it is getting used ("fruit_stat called for

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:55:32PM +0200, Michal Moravec wrote: > Hello > > I am trying to integrate OS X 10.10.4 clients into existing Samba infractructure run by our IT department. > We are currently using Samba 4.2.3. > File share is stored on iSCSI array with ext4 filesystem which should support both ACL and XATTR. > > We are trying to setup vfs_fruit module to avoid

On 26/12/2019 19:28, Steven Foucault wrote: > CentOS 8 > Samba 4.9.1 > Client: macOS 10.14 > > [global] > workgroup = LOCAL > log file = /var/log/samba/log.smb > max log size = 1000 > syslog = 0 > server role = standalone server > #unix password sync = no > min protocol = SMB2 > vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr

Hello, Server-Side Copy Offload wiki page states in Limitations section that - Both source and destination files must reside on the same Samba share! I was able to copy file between different shares located on the same zfs Pool without generating network traffic. Shares were created on Debian 8 with zfs filesystem and client was Windows Server 2016 machine mapping shares as separate drives.

I worked with Netatalk for years and want to switch to Samba now. Currently i use Ubuntu 20.04. and Debian 9 before, i had no issues with netatalk at all. As soon as i try to add a color tag (e.g. yellow) with Mac OS 10.15.5, the tag appears shortly but hides one second later. The file system is ZFS with no special options configured. I tried the Ubuntu package but also the builds from source

(example: Configure Samba to Work Better with Mac OS X [ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_Samba_to_Work_Better_with_Mac_OS_X] ). Thanks for the suggestion though. I've now been trying out the various Apple specific flags in vfs_fruit ( https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_fruit.8.html), though with no success thus far. Example settings tried in smb.conf: [global]

Hello experts/users, We have a samba server in ubuntu 18.04 LTS with version. apt-cache policy samba samba: Installed: 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.16 Candidate: 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.16 All is fine and great. Except one (internet disabled) windows 7 professional PC (sorry we still need to run it for a scientific tool) cannot connect unless I put "ntlm auth = yes" in

Hi, I just installed spandsp 0.0.3pre6 with libtiff 3.7.1 and evrythinghs is ok. I recompiled asterisk and run ldocnfig, but whrn I start asterisk I get this error: [app_rxfax.so]Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: undefined symbol: fax_set_phase_d_handler Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:440 load_modules: Loading

Am 5/30/20 um 8:00 PM schrieb Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH via samba: > I changed the configuration and raised the log level, in my opion samba tries to access the non existent double files. > Samba is now probably writing the data in a netatalk compliant way in the extended attributes of the file but is not reading it. > > new configuration: > > [Global] > min protocol = SMB2

Dear all; I'm trying to use winbindd to resolve names in an AD setup. I can authenticate just fine, but I've noticed that for some users "getent passwd" returns a GECOS field populated with displayName from the LDAP servers and for others is does not. For example: $ getent passwd user1 user1:*:1111111111:2222222222:John Doe:/home/user1:/bin/bash $ getent passwd

I?m not sure if this is related, but there was a regression a while back in handling resource forks in folder icons. It was supposed to be fixed in 4.10.13 but I don?t think it quite works yet and I haven?t had the time to test it further yet. -Perttu > On 30 May 2020, at 21.00, Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I changed the configuration

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:47:27 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. > Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much > information as possible. > > On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 21:58:40 +0200 Jonathan Szalavecz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am experiencing challenges configuring optimal file permissions for > a Samba share on my Raspberry Pi. My goal is to enable shared access > for my wife, who uses an iPhone 13, to the directory > |/mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers| while preventing access to the main >

TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup. I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time

I am experiencing challenges configuring optimal file permissions for a Samba share on my Raspberry Pi. My goal is to enable shared access for my wife, who uses an iPhone 13, to the directory |/mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers| while preventing access to the main directory |/mnt/shared|. Here is my Samba configuration: ```[NAS] ?? comment = RaspberryPi ?? public = no ?? writable = yes ??