Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Replication not working for remote Domain Controller"
2019 Jul 02
0
One DC not replicated
I have a Samba managed Windows domain with 3 Domain Controllers: dc1, dc2
and dc-dc.
All three PDC runs on Samba version 4.6.7-Ubuntu on Ubuntu Xenial.
The problem: the Domain Controller dc-dc is not correctly replicated:
========================================================================
root at dc2:/# samba-tool drs showrepl
ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb
GENSEC backend
2019 Dec 11
0
Replication not working for remote Domain Controller
On 11/12/2019 18:10, shacky via samba wrote:
> Hi,
> I have three Samba Domain Controllers, two in the LAN local network (dc1
> and dc2) and one in a remote network which is accessible from the LAN
> through a VPN connection (dc4).
> Every domain controller can reach every other domain controllers, and every
> type of traffic is permitted by firewalls, they can ping and access to
2019 Oct 29
0
Samba Replication problem between two DCs
On 29/10/2019 00:47, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote:
> I am having issues with Samba DC replication between two directly
> connected DCs.
>
> I don't understand what is wrong or how to fix it. Can someone advise?
>
> $ sudo samba-tool drs showrepl
> Default-First-Site-Name\OLYMPIA
> DSA Options: 0x00000001
> DSA object GUID: 50507d18-c8ee-4ef4-bbda-4d0d9bc31caa
>
2019 Oct 30
0
Automate Kerberized SSH Connections using Samba 4 as the KDC??
On 10/29/19 6:14 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this is a resolving problem.
>
> Can you verify this:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record
> Especialy these : for both guids and cross check if from both servers.
> host -t CNAME 50507d18-c8ee-4ef4-bbda-4d0d9bc31caa._msdcs.....
>
> Can you post from both
2019 Oct 29
2
Samba Replication problem between two DCs
I'm pretty sure this is a resolving problem.
Can you verify this:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record
Especialy these : for both guids and cross check if from both servers.
host -t CNAME 50507d18-c8ee-4ef4-bbda-4d0d9bc31caa._msdcs.....
Can you post from both server.
/etc/hosts
/etc/resolv.conf
host servername
host fqdn
host servername @dns othere
2023 Mar 08
1
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
Hi.
As happened some weeks ago, here I am again updating an old Samba 4.14.x network to a current version. The server hosting the FSMO roles is a Debian10 with 4.14.14, while the third node is a Ubuntu 18 running LinuxSchools build 4.14.8.
We started from a Ubuntu 20.04 server running Louis builds. We demoted the node and joined it back to the domain with 4.17.5 from Michael. Although on the
2019 Oct 29
3
Samba Replication problem between two DCs
I am having issues with Samba DC replication between two directly
connected DCs.
I don't understand what is wrong or how to fix it. Can someone advise?
$ sudo samba-tool drs showrepl
Default-First-Site-Name\OLYMPIA
DSA Options: 0x00000001
DSA object GUID: 50507d18-c8ee-4ef4-bbda-4d0d9bc31caa
DSA invocationId: d7f3c683-fcf2-473c-be01-a6f58af6cb88
==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ====
2023 Mar 08
2
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
A: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Cc: "Rowland Penny" <rpenny at samba.org>
Inviato: Mercoled?, 8 marzo 2023 17:01:34
Oggetto: Re: [Samba] Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
Please do not 'cc' me or
2014 Dec 11
0
PJSIP configuration question
I am not sure what you mean by the ful SIP signaling?
Here is the trace for the sip.conf which works successfully.
Below that, I will include the trace for the pjsip.conf which it seems Vitelity isn't accepting the ACK in response to the OK
---- SIP ---
<--- Transmitting SIP request (1004 bytes) to UDP:64.2.142.93:5060 --->
INVITE sip:8005555555 at 64.2.142.93 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
2023 Mar 08
2
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
08.03.2023 20:09, Fabrizio Rompani via samba ?????:
...
> root at landc:~# samba-tool drs showrepl --summary
> There are failing connections
> Failing outbound connections:
> CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=lan
> Default-First-Site-Name\NEXTCLOUD via RPC
> DSA object GUID: 3fa4ff9a-7fdc-4912-ad73-08b98f6bf347
> Last attempt @ Wed Mar 8
2023 Apr 14
2
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
On 14/04/2023 12:13, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote:
>
>> That all smells quite similar to what I were seeing
>> here before, and what someone else were seeing too,
>> all with 4.17[.4]. This famouse WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
>> error too.
>
> We upgraded one more domain, and in the hope to avoid this error, we remained on 4.16. So we deployed a new 4.16.9 DC, joined,
2017 Aug 12
0
Samba 4.6 replication issue (WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
Hello!
Please help me with the following issue:
My employer has an Active Directory with four samba4 domain controllers
named dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4. `samba-tool drs showrepl` on dc2 constantly shows
DC=mydomain
Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 48bff36e-35e2-4b09-9e40-9d73b9a5387b
Last attempt @ Sat Aug 12 21:48:43 2017 MSK failed,
2023 Mar 08
1
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
hi ,
thank's for your reply .
no , current DC doesn't have that GUID:
samba-tool spn list zimbra$
zimbra$
...
ldap/3ecb2a51-b21d-4bef-84ed-700db7963ff4._msdcs.domain.lan
samba-tool spn list landc$
landc$
...
ldap/5bf8cf1f-1e35-40c6-a20d-0abc88238d92._msdcs.domain.lan
that GUID is of the machine we are trying to join to:
samba-tool spn list nextcloud$
nextcloud$
...
2023 Apr 14
2
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
> That all smells quite similar to what I were seeing
> here before, and what someone else were seeing too,
> all with 4.17[.4]. This famouse WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
> error too.
We upgraded one more domain, and in the hope to avoid this error, we remained on 4.16. So we deployed a new 4.16.9 DC, joined, everything is fine.
Remove the old DC, upgrade OS, install 4.16.10 (which was
2023 Mar 08
1
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
On 08/03/2023 17:09, Fabrizio Rompani via samba wrote:
>
> yes , after join completed .
> error is trigged with the command :
>
> root at landc:~# samba-tool drs showrepl --summary
> There are failing connections
> Failing outbound connections:
> CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=lan
> Default-First-Site-Name\NEXTCLOUD via RPC
> DSA object
2018 Nov 21
2
Samba4 multiple DCs replication
Cordialement,
Doe Corp
<https://www.openevents.fr/>
<https://www.facebook.com/OPENevents-172305449504004/>
<https://twitter.com/SocOPENevents>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/openevents/>
Julien Téhéry
Ingénieur Systèmes & Réseaux | OPENevents
15 avenue de l'Europe
86170 Neuville de Poitou
phone : +33 5 49 62 26 03 <tel:+33549622603>
mail :
2010 Jan 16
2
predict.glm
Hi,
See below I reply your message for <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2008-April/160966.html>[R] predict.glm & newdata posted on Fri Apr 4 21:02:24 CEST 2008
You say it ##works fine but it does not: if you look at the length of yhat2, you will find 100 and not 200 as expected. In fact predict(reg1, data=x2) gives the same results as predict(reg1).
So I am still looking for
2009 Aug 31
0
source(.trPaths[5], echo=TRUE, max.deparse.length=150)
I just upgraded to Tinn-R 2.3.2.3. Is the above line (see Subject)
going to be echoed back to me everytime I try to send a command to R of
can I stop it? I've also lost my function of arrowing back up to recall
previous commands. Can I get that back?
richard
--
Richard M. Anderson, Assistant Professor
Duke University, Nicholas School of the Environment
A321 LSRC
Box 90328
Durham, NC
2017 Jun 26
2
Remove stale DRS replication partner
Dear list,
After (almost) successfully removing a dead DC from my domain I am left
with only one visible symptom:
samba-tool drs showrepl shows two stale outbound link for one of the
remaining 2 DCs:
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=subdom,DC=mydom,DC=com
NTDS DN: CN=NTDS
2018 Dec 12
0
error with joining new DC to domain
Thanks Rowland for your answer.
these are sernet-packages from their subscription.
There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs
(dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on
centos 7)
dc-11 has all fsmo. joining with the old dc-01 and dc-02 doesn´t even
work.
dc-01 joins but gives me this:
Deleted