similar to: Samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for Centos7/RHEL7

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.8.11 that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 If you're on RHEL7/Centos7, you've got several repos to choose from: http://azzurro.ezplanet.net/el7

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.8 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). These rpms use the default python2 from the system. The 4.10.x SPEC file is now more closely aligned with upstream (Fedora SPEC file) and I've yet to test these builds using the system's python3 on RHEL7.

On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:09 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.10 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 How do you build this on

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.4 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. These rpms use the default python2 from the system. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.7 http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.12 Regards, Vincent

On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 > > ? > > Hi Sergio, > that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls- >

Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) Hi Sergio, I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 might be needed: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). Regards, Vincent On Mon, 8

Hi Garming, Thanks for taking the time to enlighten me. I do happen to have two DC's and in my limited testing, 4.10.2 seems to function properly as an AD/DC on el7.6 with the packages I built. As I'm not using those DC's for file serving in a clustered setup, it is also my interpretation that I can do without ctdb (this one had a specific requirement for a higher version of a

Hai,   I've updated the Samba 4.8.10 packages for Debian 9   Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ Build logs: https://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/stretch/ Short version: apt-get install apt-transport-https # optional if you setup https apt repo. wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian

Hi All, I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :) I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat). I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7. (this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake) but... building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows

On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: >> http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 ? Hi Sergio, that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls-3.3.39 and nettle-2.7.1: [root at dc02 ~]# rpm -q nettle gnutls nettle-2.7.1-8.el7.x86_64 nettle-2.7.1-8.el7.i686

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 06:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle > > > 3.2 >

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 10:55 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.11 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 > > If you're

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.10/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.9.10) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

Hai, If updated the following: buster-samba411 for amd64/i386 and armhf, updated to 4.11.3 Buster-samba410 for amd64/i386, coming. bionic-samba411 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.11.3 bionic-samba410 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.10.11 bionic-samba49 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.9.17 stretch-samba49 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.9.17 stretch-samba10 for amd64/i386, coming Next on todo,

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2

On Mon, 20 May 2019, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 20 May 2019, Tom Diehl via samba wrote: > >> On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> Well OK maybe I should have said self compiled using the instructions @ >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Build_Samba_from_Source#configure and >> the package list from >>

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

Hi Konstantin, On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: > Vincent, excellent work! Thank you. Glad it's helping others. > Can you also provide support for rados vfs (already exists in SPEC) and > ctdb_mutex_ceph_rados_helper? That's probably doable but you'd have to BETA-test for me since I don't have a working ceph cluster at home. The information

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719824 ,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-, Vincent S. Cojot, Computer Engineering. STEP project. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Comite Micro-Informatique. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,. Linux Xview/OpenLook resources page

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and ldb-1.5.5. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent