similar to: unix_primary_group=yes together with vfs objects=acl_xattr not working

Hi Rowland, Am 10.12.19 um 13:05 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 10/12/2019 11:41, Klaus Jaensch via samba wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> we want to change the configuration of our Samba domain member file >> servers to use >> >> unix_primary_group=yes >> >> After some experiments I was able to get it to work, but only with >> >>

Am 10.12.19 um 15:08 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 10/12/2019 13:29, Klaus Jaensch via samba wrote: >> Hi Rowland, >> >>>> I used the latest Ubuntu server version for testing: >>>> >>>> Samba version 4.10.7-Ubuntu >>>> >>> Here is my test smb.conf >> >> [global] >> ? security = ads >> ? realm =

On 10/12/2019 13:29, Klaus Jaensch via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > >>> I used the latest Ubuntu server version for testing: >>> >>> Samba version 4.10.7-Ubuntu >>> >> Here is my test smb.conf > > [global] > ? security = ads > ? realm = SAMDOM > ? workgroup = IPS > ? idmap config *:backend =tdb > ? idmap config *:range =

Hi, On a samba 4.9.4 fileserver using ad backend with rfc2307  , when i create a file from a Win10 client, it s always created with the rights user:"domain users". I ve understood that with "unix_primary_group = yes" , the file should be created with the rights user:gidNumber . Here is my config : [global]        security = ADS        workgroup = SAMBA494        realm =

I have the same conclusion Anybody have a conf with "unix_primary_group = yes" working ? Christian Le 06/02/2019 à 15:39, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:25:08 +0100 > Christian Daré via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> thanks for the answer, Louis. >> i m talking about the userhome dir. >> I ve already read

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Hai

thanks for the answer, Louis. i m talking about the userhome dir. I ve already read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders and i m applying the posix acls to my share. As the users's home is shared between windows and linux, i d rather use the posix acls than the windows ones. Beside the homedir of my users have a form like /home/ first letter of name /login ( ex : /home/d/dare

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Christian Daré via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 11:54 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > Hi, > > On a samba 4.9.4 fileserver using ad backend with rfc2307  , when i > create a file

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:25:08 +0100 Christian Daré via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > thanks for the answer, Louis. > i m talking about the userhome dir. > I ve already read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders > and i m applying the posix acls to my share. > As the users's home is shared between windows and linux, i d rather > use the posix acls

Hai Rowland, Thats strange.. my test shows different things. A SSH login, SSO/kerberos on domain member with nfsv4 kerberized mounted homedir. Tested samba 4.8.8 and 4.9.4 (members) touch test-for-Rowland -rw-r----- 1 louis domain users 0 Feb 6 15:42 test-for-Rowland And i copied this from my w10 pc. -rwxrwx--- 1 louis domain users 0 Feb 6 15:42 test-for-Rowland - kopie

Hmm, Yes Rowland it test also failed. id louis uid=10002(louis) gid=10000(domain users) groups=10000(domain users),27(sudo),10004(servers-ssh),10008(servers-www) louis at mailhopper2:~$ getent passwd louis obell:*:10002:10000:L.P.H. van Belle:/home/users/louis:/bin/bash The difference here is all my users have "Domain users" as primary group. Just like in windows, that the

Hi, In winbind, are there any plans to add the idmap_ad options "unix_primary_group" and "unix_nss_info" to the idmap_rfc2307 backend? I am using an ldap proxy to preserve the UNIX uids and gids between two domains, and it would be nice to also share the shell setting and the UNIX primary group as well.

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:19:28PM +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 19/12/2019 21:46, Sebastian Lisic wrote: > >Thanks for the quick reply, Rowland! > > > >The problem I have is that the clients of each domain do not have access to the other domain's DC. Only the DCs of each domain can talk to one another. With Microsoft no longer allowing POSIX attributes to be

Hi, fp is a data frame like this ,----[ fp ] | Frequenz AmpNorm | 1 3322 0.0379490639 | 2 3061 0.0476033058 | 3 2833 0.0592954124 | 4 2242 0.1275510204 `---- i want to find the "Frequenz" where "AmpNorm" is max. I use this line as workaround: PeakFreqHz = subset(fp, AmpNorm == max(AmpNorm))$Frequenz[1] Is there something nicer? And is there an

Hi all, Can somebody explain why length("") returns 1 and not 0? How do I test if a given string is the empty string? Thanks, Steffen. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I cannot edit ACLs from Windows any more since I added "vfs object = recycle" to one share. ACLs still work on other shares. I have "vfs objects = acl_xattr" in the global section. Is this incompatible with recycle? The strange thing is that even after commenting out "recycle" and reloading smb.conf, ACLs still don't work on that share. Do I need to

Hi. I'm using Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix (RH-9.0) as member of WinNT4 domain. I joined samba to the domain. I configured the winbind daemon and nsswitch switch to map NT users to unix users. Then I set ACL support on an ext3 partition and share the mount point of this partition with ACL Samba support: - my share is [test_share] - the directory is /mnt/test_dir Shortly: ----

Hello everybody. I just upgraded our Fedora fileserver to version 30, which has Samba 4.13.2. Now, I can see this errors in log: check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [dmu60evo] -> [dmu60evo] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER, authoritative=1 Auth: [SMB2,(null)] user []\[dmu60evo] at [?t, 19 lis 2020 15:50:26.373477 CET] with [NTLMv2] status [NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER]

On 1/30/24 20:15, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > *Setup shared folder* > > ?* Create the folder /data/migrtest > ?* Set ownership to root:"Domain Admins" > ?* chmod 0770 migrtest iirc this has to be 0777, otherwise the kernel gets in your way. You only want Samba to enforce permissions so you have to get the kernel filesystem permissions our of the way by goint

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:38:31 +0100 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 31.01.2024 10:09, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > > On 1/31/24 09:50, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > >> The crucial problem here is, that Everyone (yes, really everyone) > >> can write to the root share. > > > > why don't you just