similar to: get_share_mode_lock:, get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY with Samba 4.11.2

Upgraded to Samba 4.11.2 and I?ve now too started seeing the message: get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY A lot. I modified the source in source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c a bit in order to print out the values of the service path, smb_fname & old_write_time when it fails and it seems they are all NULL? [2019/11/14 14:24:23.358441, 0]

On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 07:16 +0300, ?????? via samba wrote: > Hi all. help please: > # systemctl status smbd.service > ... > Nov 03 06:53:09 server1.local.my smbd[4585]: [2019/11/03 > 06:53:09.857837, 1] > ../../source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c:597(get_share_mode_lock) > Nov 03 06:53:09 server1.local.my smbd[4585]: get_share_mode_lock: > get_static_share_mode_data

Hai, I'm wondering, why this is not in 4.11 ? The current error messages, makes people look in the wrong direction. Do you know if its prepaired it for next release? Else i'll patch it into my builds. Rowland, tell me, how did you find the change through git, thats still a part i need to improve. :-/ I looked in bugzilla, but was not able to find it. Thanks, i noticed this one

On 29/11/2019 08:04, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > Hello all, > after the upgarde from Samba 4.10.7 to 4.11.2 we get lots of these in > our logfiles: > > > 2019-11-28T20:40:44+01:00 lx-sv-09 smbd_audit: [2019/11/28 > 20:40:44.886615, 1] > ../../source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c:597(get_share_mode_lock) > 2019-11-28T20:40:44+01:00 lx-sv-09 smbd_audit:

Hi all, hope, its ok, to join here.. Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2019, 14:34:29 CET schrieb Peter Eriksson via samba: > Upgraded to Samba 4.11.2 and I?ve now too started seeing the message: > > get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY > > A lot. I modified the source in source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c a bit in > order to print out the

Upgrade from samba version? OS=? Smb.conf content = ? These thing do help us in helping to find your problem. So can you tell a bit more about the server. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Peter Eriksson via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 14 november 2019 14:34 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org

Hi The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times, yesterday and the week after. The default group at example The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we use autorid in that way [global] security = ads workgroup = CUSTOMER realm = CUSTOMER.COM winbind use default domain = yes winbind enum users = yes winbind enum group = yes

Samba 4.10.8 - > 4.11.2 (latest update) FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 Dell PowerEdge R730xd with 256GB RAM and some 140TB disk ZFS filesystems smb.conf: [global] private directory = /liu/etc/samba/private lock directory = /liu/var/samba/locks cache directory = /liu/var/samba/cache state directory = /liu/var/samba/state ncalrpc dir = /liu/var/samba/ncalrpc ;; Network interfaces bind

Hi list, I'm getting a lot of these on a CTDB cluster serving files to Windows clients: [2016/06/24 08:53:55.555485, 1] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:578(ndr_pull_error) ndr_pull_error(11): Pull bytes 4 (../librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c:150) [2016/06/24 08:53:55.555506, 1] ../source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c:141(parse_share_modes) ndr_pull_share_mode_lock failed: Buffer Size Error [2016/06/24

Hello everyone, I hope you are well. Take care of yourself. I have the same problem as describe here: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-December/187545.html I migrate a file share from a MAC-OS environment. For its new storage system, the company purchased an ASUSTOR NAS. This NAS works with an operating system based on version 4.14 of the GNU / LINUX x86_64 kernel. This NAS operates a

I'm trying to set up a simple test server, but smbd fails to start: [2016/11/14 00:21:24, 0] ../source3/smbd/server.c:1241(main) smbd version 4.2.10-Debian started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2014 [2016/11/14 00:21:24.881448, 0] ../lib/util/charset/convert_string.c:391(convert_string_talloc_handle) convert_string_talloc: Conversion not supported. [2016/11/14

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 14:03:43 +0200 "Ing. Claudio Nicora via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a working Samba 4.7.6 DC with the default /sysvol > and /netlogon shares. > > These shares work perfectly and domain users can access them without > any issue. > > Now, to ease experimenting with config files and stuff (it's not a > production

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:29:01 +0200 "Ing. Claudio Nicora" <claudio.nicora at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Your glasses (or lack of) ;-) > I usually agree, but in this case I've seen that warning and > voluntarily ignored it because it worked for 2 days... > I thought I was lucky ;-) > > > Or to put it another way, you must set the permissions from Windows

> Undoubtedly '3000000' will be Administrator, who will be mapped to ID > '0' (root) in idmap.ldb and 'users' is mapped from 'Domain Users' in > idmap.ldb. Will live with that; that share is only used while playing with samba config easily from Windows clients. I'll remove it just before going to production. > There is a slight problem with the way

We see these messages showing up in the logs. What does this mean? Definition? Thank you, Bob -- BOB BUCK SENIOR PLATFORM SOFTWARE ENGINEER SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER 250 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 T (212) 298-9624 ROBERT.BUCK at SOM.COM

On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 16:46 -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:38 PM Robert Buck via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> > wrote: > > > We see these messages showing up in the logs. What does this mean? > > Definition? > > > > Thank you, > > Bob > > > > > It's most likely a conversion of ENOMEM to

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

> Your glasses (or lack of) ;-) I usually agree, but in this case I've seen that warning and voluntarily ignored it because it worked for 2 days... I thought I was lucky ;-) > Or to put it another way, you must set the permissions from Windows > > This is one of the problems/features of using a DC as a fileserver. > > Remove everything after the 'read only = No'

I have a working Samba 4.7.6 DC with the default /sysvol and /netlogon shares. These shares work perfectly and domain users can access them without any issue. Now, to ease experimenting with config files and stuff (it's not a production server), I've added a /rootdisk share (path=/) limiting its access ro root and domain admins: --------- # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global]        

Hi, A day or so after starting samba, some daemons (diferent forks) begin to hang. Then, the WinXP clients hang too completely. When I try to figure out what is happen, I see that smbd daemons hangs always in a fcntl64() call: # strace -p 6414 Process 6414 attached - interrupt to quit fcntl64(14, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=3684, len=1} <unfinished ...> Process 6414