Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help"
2019 Nov 28
2
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
Hi Rowland,
> Remove 'map untrusted to domain = Yes', it has been removed.
>
> Add 'domain logons = Yes'
>
> This gets it back to being a PDC:
thanks for the hints! I did that, but it doesn't help. I guess the
problem is not on the PDC server but on SERVER2. That's the one
that got upgraded and stopped working (even with the non-pdc config
of SERVER1).
I
2019 Nov 28
2
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> So your server doesn't seem to be able to find winbindd, are you sure it
> is running ?
>
> What does this show:
>
> ps ax | grep '[w]inbind'
>
> What OS is this ?
It's SuSE Linux Enterprise 15sp1. winbindd is definitely running, I showed
that in the first mail in the output of "rcwinbind status", there you can
2019 Nov 29
3
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
Hi Rowland,
thanks for all your input!
Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> Could it be Selinux or Apparmor (not sure which SLES uses) stopping smbd
> contacting winbindd ?
No, none of these is running on our systems.
> Could the SLES Samba packages be wrong ?
Yes, that's a possibility. I opened a SR with SUSE support, but they
usually take some time to analyse and propose a
2019 Nov 29
1
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
Hi,
Ralph Boehme via samba wrote:
> which doesn't surprise me. Wasn't "security=domain" removed in that
> timeframe?
I've found no hint that security=domain was removed. Do you have a
reference for that?
https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html
still lists it as option and in many examples.
> You may want to switch to security=ads.w
We
2018 Sep 18
1
Why are system-namespaces not copied?
Hi,
the man page states
For systems that support extended-attribute namespaces, a copy being
done by a super-user copies all namespaces except system.*.
That's the reason why NFAv4 ACLs are not copied as they are in the
system.nfs4_acl (or system.nfs4acl) namespace.
Why are those namespaces excluded?
Not being able rsync ACLs von NFSv4 is a major drawback now that
NFsv4 becomes
2011 Oct 14
2
rsync compares all files again and again
Hi,
we do a 1:1 backup from our main raid to a backup raid every night with
rsync -a --delete /mnt/raid1/ /mnt/raid2
rsync is 3.09, filesystems are ext3, OS is SLES 11 SP1.
The rsync process takes several hours, even if no file has changed at all.
Using -vv I see that rsync compares all files every time and that takes
long for some hundreds of millions of small files.
Can I tell rsync it
2017 Oct 06
2
rsync does hours of "fake-work" after failure
Hi,
I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as
shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also
with rsync-HEAD-20170123.
I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our
TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't
handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger.
rsync worked for 3 hours copying
2004 Aug 09
0
pxelinux problems with some Fujitsu-Siemens PCs and a solution
Hi,
I'm not subscribed to the list, so please cc me if you want to reach me.
We've found some interesting problem with some Fujitsu-Siemens PCs using
pxelinux:
The PCs are "FS Scenico L" with Athlon XP 1800+ CPUs and Via KT266
chipset. We tried to boot off pxe using pxelinux 2.09/2.10 with several
3com 3c905-* cards. The PCs loaded the kernel but right after
2019 Nov 28
0
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
On 28/11/2019 16:46, Frank Steiner via samba wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we've problems getting samba shares to work after upgrading from 4.7
> to 4.9. We have one samba PDC server providing some shares and the
> users via local passdb.tdb file. Its smb.conf (names/ips changed):
>
> [global]
> ??????? security = user
> ??????? encrypt passwords = yes
> ??????? passdb
2019 Nov 29
0
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
On 28/11/2019 22:32, Frank Steiner wrote:
> Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>
>> So your server doesn't seem to be able to find winbindd, are you sure it
>> is running ?
>>
>> What does this show:
>>
>> ps ax | grep '[w]inbind'
>>
>> What OS is this ?
>
> It's SuSE Linux Enterprise 15sp1. winbindd is definitely running, I
2019 Nov 28
0
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
On 28/11/2019 19:39, Frank Steiner wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> I think the problem is missing connection between smbd and winbindd
> on SERVER2, i.e. this error message:
>
>> check_winbind_security: winbindd not running - but required as domain
>> member: NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS
>
> Obviously I have to change sth. on SERVER2 as "security=domain" should
2019 Nov 29
2
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
On 29/11/2019 09:13, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote:
> On 11/29/19 10:04 AM, Frank Steiner via samba wrote:
>> Hi Rowland,
>>
>> thanks for all your input!
>>
>> Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>
>>> Could it be Selinux or Apparmor (not sure which SLES uses) stopping smbd
>>> contacting winbindd ?
>> No, none of these is running on our
2019 Nov 29
0
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
On 11/29/19 10:04 AM, Frank Steiner via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> thanks for all your input!
>
> Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>
>> Could it be Selinux or Apparmor (not sure which SLES uses) stopping smbd
>> contacting winbindd ?
>
> No, none of these is running on our systems.
> ?
>> Could the SLES Samba packages be wrong ?
>
> Yes,
2019 Nov 29
0
security=domain fails after upgr. to 4.9, winbind doesn't help
On 11/29/19 10:29 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 29/11/2019 09:13, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote:
>> On 11/29/19 10:04 AM, Frank Steiner via samba wrote:
>>> Hi Rowland,
>>>
>>> thanks for all your input!
>>>
>>> Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could it be Selinux or Apparmor (not sure which SLES uses)
2019 Feb 06
4
unix_primary_group = yes don t work
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Rowland Penny via samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100
> L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote:
>
> > Hai
2019 Feb 06
6
unix_primary_group = yes don t work
thanks for the answer, Louis.
i m talking about the userhome dir.
I ve already read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders and
i m applying the posix acls to my share.
As the users's home is shared between windows and linux, i d rather use
the posix acls than the windows ones.
Beside the homedir of my users have a form like /home/ first letter of
name /login ( ex : /home/d/dare
2002 Mar 08
1
new user: confused about user/password stuffs
I am trying to use my w2k box (not in domain, only in
workgroup) to access my samba server.
my smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = SAMBA
netbios name = TESTSMB
server string = Samba Server
security = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
update encrypted = Yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options =
2005 Aug 08
2
Windows can't see my Samba shares...
Ok... I'm really stumped. I have checked thoroughly. I've performed
all of the steps in the checklist from the HowTo... except for the
nmblookup parts. The arguments to nmblookup seem to be based on an
old version. I'm hoping someone will have an idea. Here's the whole
situation...
Server:
Fedora Core 3
Linux myserver 2.6.11-1.35_FC3 #1 Mon Jun 13 00:52:08 EDT 2005 i686
i686
2010 Apr 28
3
Getting the window having the focus
Greetings!
I'm currently gathering information that helps software in assessing the
user's context. One very important such data would be the application
that the user is currently working with which mostly is roughly
equivalent to the name of the window that has the focus. Unfortunately
I'm at a loss even about which API to ask for this information. As
personally I am using compiz as
2011 Sep 04
2
what is wrong with my quicksort?
Hey guys,
I tried to program quicksort like this but somethings wrong.
please help
>partition <- function(x, links, rechts){
>
> i <- links
> j <- rechts
> t <- 0
> pivot <- sample(x[i:j],1)
>
> while(i <= j){
>
> while(x[i] <= pivot){
> i = i+1}
>
> while(x[j] >= pivot){
> j = j-1}
>
> if( i