similar to: samba-tool provision - Undefined symbol "ldb_handler_copy"

Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: > >> Samba 4.8. It turns out that both the FreeBSD bin and source packages >> are broke. Fully functional, error free binaries were eventually created >> by manually installing about a dozen requisite packages, one at a time >> along the way, whenever make halted on an error. >> To add to a difficult day, something

Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File

Rowland penny wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/local/bin/samba-tool", line 33, in <module>

On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 08:38 +0200, Andrea Venturoli via samba wrote: > On 4/4/19 12:36 AM, Suporte - KONTROL via samba wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks much for the message. > > > > As I am using FreeBSD 12, that´s the latest SAMBA version available > > via PKG support, although I know it's possible to compile the ver > > 4.10 > > Would

This sounds familiar... I suggest you try without the interface names and only ipnumbers. Test 1) interfaces = 10.1.2.34/24 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = yes nbt client socket address = 127.0.0.1 Try again. In addition to test 1, Test 2. > ntlm auth=YES Remove that from the smb.conf then try again. At least for this test remove it. After a web search I found the solution

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 >> server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a >> network isolated from the Production Server (PS). >> The DR's /var/db/samba4 directory, which contains the private >> directory,

On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Possible things to check: > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? Sure. It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as an alias on the base host. > Try just setting 'vlan1' You mean change "interfaces=vlan1 10.1.2.34/24" to just "interfaces=vlan1"? It doesn't change anything (still

On 28/05/2020 05:14, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > bind914-9.14.6 and bind-tools-9.14.6 were built and installed on a new > FreeBSD 12.1 samba DC. Then a prebuilt samba410-4.10.13 package was > installed. Both bind-dns/named.conf and BIND9_DLZ libs are missing. Is this using the ZFS filesystem ? If so, how ? What do you mean by 'a prebuilt

Hello. I've got a Samba server and I'd like it to be master browser and everything else except domain controller (the customers wants a workgroup, not a domain). Lately a Windows 2003 server was added to the net and then I guess it was removed. I keep getting messages like the following in the logs: > Apr 10 03:07:51 apocalypse nmbd[57552]: [2005/04/10 03:07:51, 0]

________________________________ From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com> Sent: ?05-?12-?2014 12:58 To: Andrea Venturoli<mailto:ml at netfence.it> Subject: RE: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue Just wondering if these samba versions are backward compatible with fedora14 and other Linux distributions. Regards, Uday ________________________________ From: Uday

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:13:45 +0100 Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it> wrote: > On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > Possible things to check: > > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? > > Sure. > It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as an alias on > the base host. > > > > > Try just setting

Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. Don Kuenz via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before

You probably want --inplace for this rather than partial. The upside of --partial is that the existing file isn't replaced until there is a complete file to replace it with. The downside is building up that entire new file. On 09/05/2017 12:01 AM, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. > > Don

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.21 release series. Changes since 4.21.4 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15795: ldb index cache is too small on known large transactions ???? (schemaupgrade, provision). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15822: Enable

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.21 release series. Changes since 4.21.4 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15795: ldb index cache is too small on known large transactions ???? (schemaupgrade, provision). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15822: Enable

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.7 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15782: winbindd shows memleak in kerberos_decode_pac. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15738: Creation of GPOs applicable to more than one group is

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.7 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15782: winbindd shows memleak in kerberos_decode_pac. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15738: Creation of GPOs applicable to more than one group is

Greetings, The process to join a new samba 4.6 DC to an existing samba 4.1 DC repeatedly caused: samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names to fail on the new DC with: Failed to connect host x.x.x.x on port 49152 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Noted: both samba versions are obsolete and will be updated post haste. Regardless, samba_dnsupdate was accidentally invoked on the new DC while the

On 15/11/2019 20:16, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 > server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a Just what do you mean by 'provisioned as a standalone host' ? Do you mean 'samba-tool domain provision --server-role=standalone' ? Rowland

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 20:16 +0000, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba > 4.8 > server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a > network isolated from the Production Server (PS). > The DR's /var/db/samba4 directory, which contains the private > directory, was then