similar to: samba-tool provision - Undefined symbol "ldb_handler_copy"

Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File

Rowland penny wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/local/bin/samba-tool", line 33, in <module>

On 2019-11-12 14:06, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > It seems that Samba/FreeBSD became a hot mess during the past couple of > years. Samba 4.8.7 now works on FreeBSD for me. It looks like we're back > to the days of Do It Yourself make from source on FreeBSD. Just a note.... While I was able to "fix" Samba 4.8 port (at least for my needs), currently I'm not investing on

Greetings, The process to join a new samba 4.6 DC to an existing samba 4.1 DC repeatedly caused: samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names to fail on the new DC with: Failed to connect host x.x.x.x on port 49152 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Noted: both samba versions are obsolete and will be updated post haste. Regardless, samba_dnsupdate was accidentally invoked on the new DC while the

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 >> server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a >> network isolated from the Production Server (PS). >> The DR's /var/db/samba4 directory, which contains the private >> directory,

Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. Don Kuenz via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before

Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 09 Dec 2016 21:52:39 UTC > Don via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The backup and restore Samba AD DC section of SambaWiki [1] refers to >> ./source4/scripting/bin/samba_backup . Although my recent version of >> samba_backup uses tdbbackup on ldb files, it

An old, standalone Samba 4.1 DC was originally provisioned with --use-rfc2307. When a new Samba 4.7 DC was joined to the original domain --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' was not used. How do you correct this oversight? Is it possible to remove the new Samba 4.7 from the original domain and then join it to the original domain yet again but this time use

Greetings, Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before rsync times out to enable a nightly local backup to complete. The local backup changes a few 512 byte blocks in the 2TB file. That's why the 2TB file is dynamic. As an

On 28/05/2020 05:14, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > bind914-9.14.6 and bind-tools-9.14.6 were built and installed on a new > FreeBSD 12.1 samba DC. Then a prebuilt samba410-4.10.13 package was > installed. Both bind-dns/named.conf and BIND9_DLZ libs are missing. Is this using the ZFS filesystem ? If so, how ? What do you mean by 'a prebuilt

Hello, I tried to send some additional comments by marking up the design doc and sending to this reflector. The document exceeds the 40KB limit of e-mail size sent to the reflector. Hopefully, the moderator will approve submission of the comments, but thought I should let the reflector know they are coming. Alternatively I could send the .fdf file that has the comments, if that would be

Greetings, This post pertains to Samba version 4.16.8 on FreeBSD 13.1. When GPMC.MSC is invoked from within a Windows server domain member, it displays an inconsistency error: <https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8386> <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14927> # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class

While not directly related to prototype/s.a.u. I thought this would be the best place to pose this question. I apologize, if it''s off topic. I''m working on an interface where I have a bunch of list items floated to the left in a horizontal fashion. The list is inside a absolutely positioned div, with an overflow set to hidden. At one point in my script I have to remove the

This sounds familiar... I suggest you try without the interface names and only ipnumbers. Test 1) interfaces = 10.1.2.34/24 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = yes nbt client socket address = 127.0.0.1 Try again. In addition to test 1, Test 2. > ntlm auth=YES Remove that from the smb.conf then try again. At least for this test remove it. After a web search I found the solution

You probably want --inplace for this rather than partial. The upside of --partial is that the existing file isn't replaced until there is a complete file to replace it with. The downside is building up that entire new file. On 09/05/2017 12:01 AM, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. > > Don

im betting here on a smb.conf that was not 4.6 compliant. port 49152 is not related i my opinion. is there a firewall running? the dynamic port range changed from a low range to high. Greetz Louis Op 17 mrt. 2019, om 22:36, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> schreef: On 17 Mar 2019 20:44:12 UTC Don Kuenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > When I load my plugin into opt or llc, I get a bunch of warnings: > > llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'use-unknown-locations' defined more than > once! > llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'disable-debug-info-print' defined more > than once! > llc: CommandLine Error: Argument

When I load my plugin into opt or llc, I get a bunch of warnings: llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'use-unknown-locations' defined more than once! llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'disable-debug-info-print' defined more than once! llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'print-dbgscope' defined more than once! llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'disable-sched-hazard'

Hey guys, I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an install from source. And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Here's more of that log entry: Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA Keepalived_vrrp[44943]: VRRP Instance = VI_1 Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:13:45 +0100 Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it> wrote: > On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > Possible things to check: > > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? > > Sure. > It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as an alias on > the base host. > > > > > Try just setting