similar to: List Index Out of Range

Hai Rowland, Thanks for this verification, bug closed. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 november 2019 10:26 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] List Index Out of Range > > On 06/11/2019 08:01, L.P.H. van Belle via

Hai, That looks like its a bug. I just verified this on a 4.10.10 AD-DC. I was hoping a python package was missing but i dont see/have missing packages here. I have exact the same result. I have reported it : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14184 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >

Hi, Again more data: The command samba-tool visualize reps seems to agree with the observed lack of replication from DC4 to DC3 & DC2: > RepsTo objects for DOMAIN > destination >

On 17/11/2020 11:54, mj via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not > propagated? to DC2/DC3, I discovered the > ?samba-tool drs uptodateness > command. > > I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" > means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? > > It's output: >

Hi all, We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very stable for years. Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from * CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com to * OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager version 7.3) Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started reporting

On 17/11/2020 14:40, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > samba-tool visualize uptodateness -r > Does not show out of sync here. > > Rowland, you any ideas on that. > This might be just cosmetic. It appears it is just cosmetic, see my other post. I have asked the person who added it, why he added it, I don't expect a quick reply, he is on the other side of the planet ?

Hello,     I'm trying to search for the following but believe my syntax may not be correct. Search the Configuration partition for any object where the Common Name contains "CNF:" and the object class is nTDSDSA. I'm using: ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(&(ObjectClass=nTDSDSA)(CN=CNF*))' Is this correct? I also tried ldbsearch -H

Hi, I found that the base of Samba 4 DC is different from the base of Windows Server 2008 DC. There are many mistakes when I make the comparison as the result as follows (only parts of reult): samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://WINDC1 ldap://SAMBA4-DC -Uadministrator Password for [EMPRESA\administrator]: * Comparing [DOMAIN] context... * DN lists have different size: 1787 != 1788 * DNs found only in

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.9. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.9 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.9. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.9 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

The pretty picture that I saw at: http://chartsgraphs.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/r-panel-chart-beats-excel-chart/#more-1096 inspired me to try something similar. The code that I wrote is: ------snipsnip--------------------------------------------------------------------- M <- structure(list(date = structure(c(13634, 13665, 13695, 13726, 13757, 13787, 13818, 13848, 13879, 13910, 13939, 13970,

Hi, Just finishing update to 4.19.5 from 4.19.4 I just found??'samba-tool visualize uptodateness -rS ?utf8???and 'samba-tool drs showrepl' Now takes 2-3 minutes to complete, where as before it was pretty much instant. The output looks fine however, replication seems to be working and I get no errors. Also, I note that 'samba-tool visualize uptodateness -rS ?utf8? has zero on

I have Samba4 running, and it had a win2k3 server joined to it. This is working great. I'd like to add another Ubuntu 12.04 server with samba4 beta5. What's the best join method? Do I provision the server as a member, then join using samba-tools domain join <domain> When I do it looks like it doesn't replicate the directory, just forwards? Should I provision as a DC with

Hi, Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not propagated to DC2/DC3, I discovered the samba-tool drs uptodateness command. I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? It's output: > root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness > Unknown invocation ID

I was running samba 4.21 as a domain controller and now I see this situation , I have empty outbound neighbors, but if you look from the windows side, then this is the difference between windows controllers and samba, for some reason the repsTo attribute is not filled, for example, the configuration context, although windows controllers have both attributes fully filled, although they are the same

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.6. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.6 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= vfs_fruit option

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.6. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.6 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= vfs_fruit option

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2

Same as MJ and You. So you have 5 DC's running. > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > >>> Unknown invocation

On 9/19/2016 1:37 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:19:08 +0200 > Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: >>> >>> Am 19.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:57:38 -0400 >>>> Adam