similar to: Defaults for Parameters in vfs_fruit

I notice the Configure Samba to Work Better with Mac OS X has been radically shortened?not sure why, but you may want to look at my original 22 Apr 2019 version in the history. You may want to put vfs objects in Global. Note in the vfs_fruit man page: Be careful when mixing shares with and without vfs_fruit. OS X clients negotiate SMB2 AAPL protocol extensions on the first tcon, so mixing shares

(example: Configure Samba to Work Better with Mac OS X [ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_Samba_to_Work_Better_with_Mac_OS_X] ). Thanks for the suggestion though. I've now been trying out the various Apple specific flags in vfs_fruit ( https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_fruit.8.html), though with no success thus far. Example settings tried in smb.conf: [global]

Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >> >> $ rm test.txt >> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >> >> cannot remove: >> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan >> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite >> OS X 10.9.5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:37:43PM +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: >On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote: >>My goal with activating vfs_fruit was to speed up directory listings >>for Mac clients, which works. Can the accompanying slowdown for >>Windows clients be avoided? > >yeah, I guess so, but somebody has to dig through the

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:55:32PM +0200, Michal Moravec wrote: > Hello > > I am trying to integrate OS X 10.10.4 clients into existing Samba infractructure run by our IT department. > We are currently using Samba 4.2.3. > File share is stored on iSCSI array with ext4 filesystem which should support both ACL and XATTR. > > We are trying to setup vfs_fruit module to avoid

Hi, My log files are being flooded with errors like the ones below whenever a Mac delete files from a Samba share. [2019/07/26 14:02:26.182564, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_recycle.c:243(recycle_get_file_size) recycle: stat for Chris_Mac/._videos.docx returned No such file or directory [2019/07/26 14:02:27.186472, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_recycle.c:243(recycle_get_file_size) recycle: stat

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 06:34:31PM -0400, John Mulligan wrote: > Hello List, > > My team and I have started testing out vfs_fruit to see if it helps us improve > the directory browsing performance of Mac clients. After enabling it some of > our tests began failing due to an "The permissions on x are incorrectly > ordered" error on Windows. Which tests? > I

Hi, I'm very happy to see the work done on vfs_fruit. This has been a pain-point for our users for a long time now, and it seems like we're finally close to a solution. Thanks, Ralph! That said, we're still having some issues. I've installed Samba 4.2.2 from the SerNet Ubuntu package repo on a test VM running Xubuntu 14.04.2 LTS. I've set up Samba with a simple share

Is it possible to backup Mac OS devices through a Samba share on Samba 4.4.6 on Fedora 24 with Time Machine? I am able to successfully advertise the share through Avahi, connect to it in Finder, and read/write files. I am also able to see the share as a destination in Time Machine, but selecting it shows an error that "The selected network backup disk does not support the required

Hello Kevin, Mac OS by default looks for TimeMachine volumes over AFP not CIFS-SMB… Like you, I experimented with Samba a couple of years ago to try to get it to work anyway. With a few modifications on the client’s part and some configuration on the Samba server I got it to work… but recovery only worked for clients that I had configured in advance… Recovery with the Mac OS tools (Migration

Hello I am trying to integrate OS X 10.10.4 clients into existing Samba infractructure run by our IT department. We are currently using Samba 4.2.3. File share is stored on iSCSI array with ext4 filesystem which should support both ACL and XATTR. We are trying to setup vfs_fruit module to avoid possible performance problems on OS X clients. We do NOT user netatalk. Current vfs_fruit config:

Hi all, We use the vfs_fruit module and lately we have experienced that random files copied with Finder are being grayed out. We think this is probably due to the extended attribute "user.DosStream.AFP_AfpInfo:$DATA" not being updated/removed after the file is copied. If we manually remove the xattr in question with the command setfattr -d 'user.DosStream.AFP_AfpInfo:$DATA', the

Have a WD MyCloud (v.1) NAS running “latest” (12Mar19) f/w which runs linux 3.2.26 & smbd 4.3.11 (yeah…both are EOL). vfs fruit, catia & streams_xattr are included modules. Have tweaked server smb.conf for Mac OSX (see my post for the Mac OSX-related Globals https://community.wd.com/t/solved-tweaking-samba-smb2-for-mac-androids/236189 ), however, although I was able to reduce the SMB2

Hi Ralph, Thanks, it works as expected with 4.2.0rc2! I simply followed the manual and added this to the share's config: vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:resource = file fruit:metadata = netatalk fruit:locking = netatalk fruit:encoding = native Thanks for your help. Markus On 10.12.14 12:06, Ralph B?hme wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10:36AM +0100,

Yes, I've tried all of them at this point. I spent some time focusing on SMB2 due to various sources indicating they target it for stability (example: Configure Samba to Work Better with Mac OS X [ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_Samba_to_Work_Better_with_Mac_OS_X] ). Thanks for the suggestion though. I've now been trying out the various Apple specific flags in vfs_fruit (

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled

Hai, Can anyone tell me the "adviced" extra package versions for this release. I did a checkup at : https://www.samba.org/ftp/?C=M;O=D And i noticed the following. Ldb from 1.1.27 to 1.1.28, as mentiond in the changelog Talloc from 2.1.8 to 2.1.9, not mentioned in the changelog. Tdb 1.3.11 to 1.3.12, not mentioned in the changelog. Tevent 0.9.31 stays at 0.9.31 no change.

In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. $ rm test.txt rm: test.txt: Resource busy cannot remove: OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite OS X 10.9.5 Mavericks can remove: OS X 10.8.5 Mountain Lion OS X 10.7.5 Lion OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard Windows 7 Environment: Fedora rawhide samba-4.3.3-0.fc24 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = LOCALNET server string

Hi All, at work all our clients are macs (10.10 yosemite). We are trying to move from the classical afp file server to a samba based file server. After a lot of testing, things now works more or less: a mac server acts as Kerberos+OpenLDAP and a linux debian 7 box is doing the file server with samba 4.2.0. A client which has "joined" (which is bound in mac jargon) the

Hi, I previously had an issue that was fixed by implementing vfs_fruit. For reference: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199583.html <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199583.html> I’m running Samba 4.2.11 on FreeBSD 10.0 release and our shares are on ZFS. Our macs are on OS X 10.11.4. What I had previously was this: vfs objects = zfsacl Which I then