similar to: [OT] Debug strange network trouble...

Samba AD domain, composed of different DCs and DMs, someone used (also) as print server with CUPS, with Point'n'Print (driver loaded server side). This morning in a site all printers but 1 'desappeared': really the don't desappear, simply the association between printers and driver get lost someway, so printer come back to standard CUPS printer name, so clients say that

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > If you look carefully, it is '/usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate' that is > logging and this is run at samba startup and then regularly. No, i've missed that. Sorry. > if you run 'samba_dnsupdate --help' and amongst the output is > '--use-samba-tool', you can add 'dns update command > =

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's the OLD PDC for the domain 'SVCORSI', and the new AD DC for > > the domain 'LNFFVG', with different SID! They are different domains! > OK, but if the win7 machines were domain members of 'SVCORSI', then > they still might be trying to find it, best thing is to turn it off.

[ I don't think it is a samba trouble, but indeed some clue... ] A user of mine have a rather complex Thunderbird local folder email archive, in a network folder (P:\Mail), with CSC enabled (it is a portable system). Rather frequently (at least once a week) in the share a 'disk folder' (a directory) with the same name of the 'file' of the email folder get created. Because

I've noted that some weeks ago, but i was upgrading all my PVE cluster so i've considered it benevolent. Yesterday i've updated my main switch, disconnecting for a brief lag of time all my ''infrastructutes''. My SMTP server (exim) start to complain about 'unroutable addresses': 2019-01-16 18:32:40 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG <= root at sv.lnf.it H=(3jane.sv.lnf.it)

Someone out there have compiled successfully winexe with recent (4.5+) samba version? I've tried that repository: https://sourceforge.net/u/markr123/winexe/ci/master/tree/ that seems the latest fork available. Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della

From my experience when driver associates or re-associates with printer, printer ?shared name? changes. From a windows client perspective the printer disappears and needs reconnecting. After re-associating check the shared name. LP On 27 May 2024 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > > Samba AD domain, composed of different DCs and DMs, someone

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I dont get what your goal is, sorry.. :-/ And Rowland: > Why do you think you need 'netbios aliases' ? Simply: i was (ab)used to have, in my NT domain, some aliases for my servers, so i can change servers (and move services) but keeping things consistent. Eg, all my printers are connected to

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... Sorry, i come back to that: > Not sure what you are getting at here, if you add a user to a group in > AD, you not only get a record in the group object, you also get a > record in the users object > > dn: CN=Unixgroup,CN=Users,DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com > ..... > member: CN=Rowland

Sorry for that email, but i'm really confused about the subject. Starting point: in current configuration (Samba, NT mode) some portable system have CSC enabled, and when go to another site... is another site, eg does not fined the domain, so simply CSC 'work'' as expected. Now that i'm moving computer to the new domain, that is the same domain across all sites, i'm not

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > OK, NT4-style domains use netbios to find computers. > AD domains use dns Ok, this is clear. > So, my advice would be to use CNAME records in AD. > What Andrew said was correct, but netbios is on the way out, it relies > on SMB1 and the latest Win10 has this turned off by default. Ok, trying to sumarize: if i

> Manpage says that 'usershare max shares' is just at '0' as default, but > i'll give it a try and report back. OK, seems to work, log error desappeared. I can fire up bug for the manpage?! -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > So, it sounds like you have a PDC for the domain 'DOMAIN' and an AD DC > for the domain 'DOMAIN' both using the same SID, I don't think this is > going to work. I suggest you turn the old PDC off. No no no! I'm not mad! ;-) There's the OLD PDC for the domain 'SVCORSI', and the new AD DC

Sorry for a rather 'unifornative' subject, but i've little o no clue on this. I'm using at work 'pam_mount' with a rather standard configuration to mount via CIFS/SMB user's home directory, from a samba AD member server. This configuration is a bit 'old' (mint sonya, AKA Ubuntu 16.04 as a client, so samba 4.3; debian and samba 4.8 as a server), but work

[ I've just asked abut that, here, but now seems a simpler things, so i retry... ] This seems NON a samba touble, but a different behaviour in M$ client OS. But, really, i've not clue how to find an answer... Suppose to have a Win7 and a Win10 machine, both NOT joined to a domain. Suppose to have a share, with guest access enabled, where only readonly access are needed. Suppose also

I'm testing the upgrade of some domains from NT mode (LDAP backend) to AD mode. In NT mode i was (ab)used to the smbldap-tools to user management, and i've also extended a bit to manage, eg, email aliases and forwarding. Now, in AD mode, i can relay only to samba-tool, and seems to me that something misses. Apart the 'reset password' in other thread, for example: a) i've

Only b is needed. Im connecting here from a win 10 to a samba 3.6.6 smb1 through an CNAME. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 december 2017 13:45 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] [Curiosity] 'netbios aliases' works

No, i don't think this is a configuration error by mine, and still seems that ''something'' in winbind does not work properly, or at least in respect to exim. This late evening i've rebooted all my servers in a site (2DM, 2DC; DM samba 4.8, DC samba 4.5). I've firstly rebooted the DM (where one of these is the mail server), after that, and after verify that all work

I've setup my second DC, following the samba wiki, without major trouble. Only three notes: a) i've followed the suggestion to move idmap.ldb from the first DC to the second (Rowland! Clap me! I've not sayed 'primary' and 'secondary'! ;-). After that, as suggested by the wiki, i've done a 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset' but: root at vdcpp1:~# samba-tool

Hai marco, I've looked for a good example. http://www.mustbegeek.com/how-to-map-network-drive-using-group-policy/ Only, i say use \\FQDN\share not \\HOSTNAME\share Basicly, the above site says, ( the importent part ) Note that drive maps actions are all based on the drive letter. Action ?Create? and ?Update? will not work if the drive letter already in use. In this case, the action