similar to: dns replication error due to deleted records

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "dns replication error due to deleted records"

2019 Oct 11
2
dns replication error due to deleted records
On 11/10/2019 14:58, Luca Olivetti via samba wrote: > El 10/10/19 a les 20:23, Luca Olivetti via samba ha escrit: >> Today I noticed something that has been going on for some weeks: >> >> I have 2 dc, (dc1 and dc2) both debian buster with the distro >> provided samba (4.9.5), recently upgraded from stretch. >> >> samba-tool drs showrepl on dc2 says >>
2019 Oct 10
2
dns replication error due to deleted records
El 10/10/19 a les 20:41, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> It turns out that dc2 chokes on "\0ADEL" dns records, supposedly >> deleted objects. > > What you have there is known as a tombstone record and Samba has a tool > to remove them: > > samba-tool domain tombstones expunge NC > --tombstone-lifetime=TOMBSTONE_LIFETIME > > Where
2019 Oct 11
0
dns replication error due to deleted records
El 10/10/19 a les 20:23, Luca Olivetti via samba ha escrit: > Today I noticed something that has been going on for some weeks: > > I have 2 dc, (dc1 and dc2) both debian buster with the distro provided > samba (4.9.5), recently upgraded from stretch. > > samba-tool drs showrepl on dc2 says > > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=wetron,DC=es > ???????
2019 Oct 10
0
dns replication error due to deleted records
On 10/10/2019 19:23, Luca Olivetti via samba wrote: > Today I noticed something that has been going on for some weeks: > > I have 2 dc, (dc1 and dc2) both debian buster with the distro provided > samba (4.9.5), recently upgraded from stretch. > > samba-tool drs showrepl on dc2 says > > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=wetron,DC=es > ??????? Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 via
2015 Jun 02
7
Can't join machine without full access
Sernet samba 4.2.2 in ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS, a fresh migration from samba 3 (I'm still in the testing phase). I'm experimenting with task delegation. Using the ADUC wizard, I select the "Join machine to domain" task to add to my userid (I also tried a group I'm a member of with the same result), at the domain level (rough translation, this is on a localized windows 7). Adding
2019 Oct 11
4
dns replication error due to deleted records
El 11/10/19 a les 16:59, Luca Olivetti via samba ha escrit: > El 11/10/19 a les 16:12, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> Try running this on a DC: >> >> samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://DC1 ldap://DC2 >> --filter='whenChanged,dc,DC,cn,CN,ou,OU' >> >> Replace 'DC1' and 'DC2' with your actual DC short hostnames >> >> It should
2015 Mar 31
7
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
On 31/03/15 03:54, Sketch wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 30/03/15 16:33, Luca Olivetti wrote: >>> Right, the correct solution would be to package samba in a way that >>> doesn't break sssd. >> >> You could also say that sssd should be packaged in a way that works >> with the sernet packages. > > I'm with
2015 Apr 28
2
[Samba4] List of Distro currently with 4.2.X samba package
El 28/04/15 a les 12:52, Mario Pio Russo ha escrit: > hi all > > the sernet package is actually a good alterrnative, however I can't make > the repository work with ubuntu 14.04 > > has anyone used these repo? Yes, I'm using them on a test machine with ubuntu 14.04 lts. Did you replace USERNAME:ACCESSKEY with your data? Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation
2010 May 03
3
win 7, samba 3.4.7, error 0x000003e6 with some printers
Hello, I'm testing windows 7 with samba 3.4.7 and I'm using PrintUIEntry to connect the printers. With some of those printers the connection fails (client side) with error 0x000003e6. The strange thing is that: 1) trying the same connection against samba 3.0.11 works (alas, no domain functionality with that old version) and 2) two of the failing printers share the same driver with
2015 May 07
4
4.2.1 Indexing attributes
Hi all, System is Centos 7 and Samba is 4.2.1 sernet version. The database contains 120k users and 150k computers. It's size is 3.3GB on DC01 where the imports were performed and 2.8GB on the second DC. I was trying to index uid attribute and I have a strange behaviour. According to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679765%28v=vs.85%29.aspx it is the "searchFlags"
2015 Jun 03
3
Samba 4.2 AD, DC and winbindd
> I don't have a "server services" line see the defaults of smb.conf : testparm -vv | grep "server services" and you have your defaults. now you know what the defaults are.., now for example my DC. testparm -vv ( on the DC, samba-tool testparm -vv | grep "server services" ) gives back: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl,
2018 Sep 03
5
winbindd crashing -- how to auto-heal?
El 3/9/18 a les 17:13, Rowland Penny via samba ha escrit: > Yes, but it depends on how you run Samba. If you run Samba as a > standalone server you only need to run 'smbd', but running 'nmbd' as > well would be a good idea. > > If you run Samba as a PDC or BDC, the same as a standalone server goes. > > Anything else needs both smbd and winbind running. It
2018 Sep 03
2
winbindd crashing -- how to auto-heal?
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:37:03 +0200 Luca Olivetti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > El 3/9/18 a les 15:23, Robert Marcano via samba ha escrit: > > >> > >> I run this cron job every minute. Winbind usually crashes once or > >> twice a day > >> > >> #!/bin/bash > >> getent group | grep -q 513 && exit 0 >
2016 Mar 12
2
The sad state of samba 4 adaption for home/small business routers.
El 12/03/16 a les 18:27, Jeremy Allison ha escrit: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> Unfortunately it seems it is using a really old version of samba [...] >> Version 1.9.16p10 >> -D become a daemon >> -p port listen on the specified port >> -d debuglevel set the
2010 Apr 29
2
Samba 3.3.12/3.4.7/3.5.2 on "ancient" server stops responding/dies
Hello, I'm trying to upgrade samba (TPTB are going to introduce win7 workstations) on my old server (mandrake 10.0) currently running 3.0.11. I setup a virtual machine to do some testing and I built rpms for 3.5.2 (apart from the other problems it has this one https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7263) then for 3.4.7 and finally for 3.3.12. Each one of them has problems, the most
2015 Mar 31
3
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
As I have said: sssd-ad works fine with sernet packages on redhat based distros. Have you tried this? apt-get install sssd-ad samba-libs- Notice the - at the end Found here: http://serverfault.com/questions/250224/how-do-i-get-apt-get-to-ignore-some-dependencies After this, try to resolve the dependencies of the sssd-ad.so file as I have written. Regards Tim Am 31. M?rz 2015 12:22:18 MESZ,
2015 Mar 30
3
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
El 30/03/15 a les 11:38, Rowland Penny ha escrit: >> Is there any hope to have this issue fixed? Where does one report bugs >> in the sernet packaging? >> >> >> TIA > > Have you tried to install sssd-ad ? that link you posted was about > installing on 12.04, things may have changed. You could try 'apt-get > install -s sssd-ad' > This will tell
2015 Apr 10
2
samba member logon.. question.
El 09/04/15 a les 18:31, Rowland Penny ha escrit: > > If your tools rely on the posix objectclasses being there, then they are > broken. The posix objectclasses are auxiliaries of other AD > objectclasses and as such, no windows tools will add them. but, e.g., samba-tool with --uid will: luca at ubutest:~$ sudo samba-tool user add tararo tarari --use-username-as-cn
2015 Jun 12
3
Samba 4.1.17 Raise domain level to w2008 R2
Dear all, My , samba-tool domain level show shows me it is W2003: [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Can I raise without issues to W 2008 R2? Or should I stay with 2003? Greetings
2005 Mar 07
2
corruption in the locking tdb, samba panics
Hello, last friday I switched my users from an old server running 2.2.12 to a new one running 3.0.10 (that I've been testing myself and with smbtorture). After a while I had to switch back to the old server because some users were having serious problems. This is one of the logs (the others are very similar): [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)