similar to: @@state_secret

I''ve just sent a pull-request to _why with my changes[1] and here is some things that I think needs to be done before a (possible) release: * The cookie session is named Camping::Session and is placed in camping/session.rb. Maybe this should be called Camping::CookieSession or??? * The ActiveRecord session is named Camping::ARSession and is placed in camping/ar/session.rb. Maybe it

It looks like everyone has tried to fix the cookies lately, and no-one managed to get it 100% correctly. The current implementation doesn''t set the path correctly, and you can''t use @cookies in a #service-overload. Qwzybug''s patch fixed only the sessions. Jenna''s patch won''t allow to set complex cookies (@cookies.key = {:path => "/path",

Hey Judofyr! Fix this! When someone sets a cookie using @cookies.something = ''data'' it should be set with the path going to the camping app''s root, not with no path, otherwise only that controller with the same parameters will ever see the cookie again! Please change this code: > @cookies.each do |k, v| > @response.set_cookie(k, v) if o[k] != v > end

You''ll need to install the ''openid'' gem for this, and require it in your camping app: class Login < R ''/login'' def get this_url = ''http:'' + URL(''/login'').to_s unless input.finish.to_s == ''1'' # start doing the auth here begin

I''m implementing a simpler version of the Cookie Session Store in Rails 2.0. If you know what that is, skip the next paragraph. A cookie session store stores the session data inside cookies, on the client, and signs them using a secret string, hashed together. The user can decode the cookie easily if they know much about computers and see what''s inside, but they

We''ve just come across an issue for consideration. I am avoiding some words which would allow people to find this message in an internet search who have questionable intentions, but wish to communicate a strong sense of caution. Consider someone who adds extra methods to their controller which they use in their main get/post methods to do things or to get secret data. Consider

So would you like this: $ wget http://rubyforge.org/gems/junebug-0.0.18.gem $ camping junebug-0.0.18.gem Or should it be: $ gem install junebug $ touch junebug.gemcamp $ camping junebug.gemcamp _why

So it took me ages to figure out how to get cookies set in my app, and here was the problem. I''m using camping''s built in CGI support, and with that you can have something like domain.com/blah/app.rb and that will go to your / route, which is okay, except that the path the cookies are set with is domain.com/blah/app.rb/ So if you try to use that url, none of your

Hello Campers I''m not sure this is the right list to ask but: I''m using the junebug wiki (which is written in camping) for my own personal wiki. I''d like it to behave as a proper daemon, so it will start up at boot, get stopped properly at shutdown, keep a pid file in /var/run etc. This requires a little messing with the wiki script junebug makes in the wiki

I''m trying to write some tests for the ApplicationController as shared tests that can be run in all of my other controller tests, but am getting a nil.rewrite error. Below is what I have... describe AccountController do it_should_behave_like ''Application controller'' end describe ''Application controller'', :shared => true do it

Recently I had to restart my Junebug wiki and I''m receiving this error: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/junebug-0.0.18/lib/junebug.rb:4: undefined method `require_gem'' for main:Object (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.9/lib/daemons/application.rb:159:in `load'' from

=== 1. Camping on Rack === I''ve just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the "core". I got rid of (a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un-necessary files (lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb & mongrel.rb). bin/camping does now only provide WEBrick, Mongrel and console-support and should only be used in development. It uses Rack::ShowExceptions to catch

I''ve created an access control module that I''m including in several different controllers. Everything works fine, but I want to allow each controller to override the default login page with something like this: set_login_pages :secure => ''my_login'' In my module, I''ve set up the set_login_pages method like this: def self.included(base)

A few of you sounded interested in using it. I haven''t explicitly put a software license on it, so I guess it''s not technically FOSS yet. What licenses are good? BSD? Public Domain? ? Jenna -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20120502/96b87580/attachment.html>

Say that there''s a piece of functionality I want to call everytime the controller is invoked, regardless of what action I am calling. Where do I put that, exactly? Can I do that? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Good day, does anyone here have a clue on how to make use of the NoSQL database "Riak" with Camping? I am building my website and Riak seems like pretty much the ultimate database! This would probably ruin every little feature in ActiveRecord, I don''t think I''d be able to do any has_many''s or belongs_to but I''d LOVE to be proven wrong. As far as

Hello, I understand that I can use the openssl ciphers and digests available on my systems, i.e. those in the list generated by "openssl list-cipher-commands" and "openssl list-message-digest-algorithms". I want to create a admin vpn network between my servers and my workplace. Network throughput is not a big issue, I am using ssh and the cli, however I would also do

ok I've got Starcraft loaded in wine...works fine ;-) I have IPX installed within the kernel.. and have the following commandline.. modprobe ne2k-pci ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0 ipx_interface add -p eth0 802.3 0x12345678 but it seems that Starcraft cant see the IPX thingo..err anyone know how to get starcraft to

Dear Mongrels, The same questions keep coming up over and over on the list, which is ok, but not really optimal. If we added a wiki to the Mongrel site to handle FAQs, what wiki should it be? Required features would be: * Spam protection * Doesn''t look shitty I would probably spring for Trac (and also migrate the bugtracker) if noone else has opinions, but I''m sure some of

I''m preety new at RoR (and programming), I tried a few tutorials, and really like the RoR simplicity, but my knowledge of the framework still isn''t very good (to be true, i understand the basics, but not everything that''s in the tutorials). But still I''d like to create a website which has: - front end interface (with no edit functions) - admin interface