similar to: Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups

I haven't learned to use the list yet, sorry! :( See below the two smb.conf ### smb.conf - AD [global] netbios name = SRV-SAMBA realm = DOMINIO.LAN workgroup = DOMINIO dns forwarder = X.X.X.X server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes ntlm auth = yes ldap server require strong auth = no tls enabled = no security = user vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl

Dear, I am having a problem configuring Samba 4 domain member. The main server works only as AD and the second one will be for file sharing. Looking at the logs I see errors like: "UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups" Logs: https://pastebin.com/BR1W0X3E smb.conf: https://pastebin.com/B5Ve41KG Does anyone know what can it be? Thanks!

Rowland, thanks for listening. I am learning to use the list, this is the first time I use this feature, sorry for the inconvenience, I believe it is the last message that will be created as new. I changed my receive settings to be able to reply to messages individually. >From what you answered earlier, I have a main server with AD, running Samba 4, everything is configured and working. The

RCSID("$OpenBSD: scp.c,v 1.113 2003/11/23 23:21:21 djm Exp $"); Part of the OpenSSH_3.8p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003 distribution Could someone verify this case we found that causes a file to be missed during copying? Here is the setup to replicate the problem: On hosta /tmp: -rw-rw-r-- 1 user01 group01 0 Apr 13 10:44 file0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 user01

Hi, When using AD authentication from a rhel8.1 environment with samba-4.10.4 installed, information on the primary group group01 set on the AD side for any user user01 cannot be obtained. [root @ rhel8_1 ~] # id user01 uid=2001107(user01) gid=2000513(domain users) groups=2000513(domain users),2001107(oec0814e),2001103(group01) If you perform the same operation on the same AD from the

Hi, A nice problem came up. If I want to set directory permissions with getfacl or ls -la that directory or wbinfo --uid-info winbind is dieing and I got this error message in samba.log: ==> samba/samba.log <== [2013/05/30 15:03:31, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:72(fault_report) =============================================================== [2013/05/30 15:03:31, 0]

On Friday 05 February 2010 23:35:15 Evan Cheng wrote: > Does anyone actually using it? Yes, many LLVM-based projects rely upon TCO to work correctly. > I'd prefer to just remove it to clean up the implementation if no one has > any objections. Are you saying that you want to remove LLVM's working TCO and replace it with something that is faster but broken? I think you may

On Feb 5, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 05 February 2010 23:35:15 Evan Cheng wrote: >> Does anyone actually using it? > > Yes, many LLVM-based projects rely upon TCO to work correctly. Ok, that's all I need to know. > >> I'd prefer to just remove it to clean up the implementation if no one has >> any objections. > > Are you

Some frontends for LLVM require that LLVM perform tail call optimization (TCO) for correctness. Internally, LLVM refers to TCO of a non-recursive tail call as sibling call optimization, but I'm going to refer to that generically as TCO. Often, functional languages like Scheme have a language-level requirement that TCO occurs for any call in the tail position, and this is usually why users of

Dear R-Help, I am trying to compute a new variable, let's call it "target cannon orientation (tco)" based conditionally on old variables, "TargetColor," "CannonOriB," and "CannonOriR." For every case in the data set, if TargetColor is "B" then I want tco to equal the value for that case of CannonOirB, else CannonOriR. I've tried writing

Evan Cheng wrote: > As far as I can tell only PPC and X86 targets are supporting this option. Does anyone actually using it? I'd prefer to just remove it to clean up the implementation if no one has any objections. Don't know whether that is the same, but my Pure compiler sets llvm::PerformTailCallOpt. Pure needs TCO because it doesn't have any built-in looping constructs. In

On Saturday 06 February 2010 02:42:47 Evan Cheng wrote: > On Feb 5, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > On Friday 05 February 2010 23:35:15 Evan Cheng wrote: > >> Does anyone actually using it? > > > > Yes, many LLVM-based projects rely upon TCO to work correctly. > > Ok, that's all I need to know. > > >> I'd prefer to just remove it to

Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Try batch compiling with the large code model. (llc -code-model=large) > If that also causes tail calls to break, then I did something wrong in > fixing far calls in the JIT. Jeffrey, I took a closer look at this now, and all the TCO-related weirdness I see in the Pure interpreter is indeed related to your commit in r88984 ("Make X86-64 in the Large model

Jon Harrop wrote: > I just upgraded HLVM from LLVM 2.7 to 2.8 and started seeing stack overflows > so I think TCO isn't working. Have there been any obvious changes that would > cause this? FWIW, Pure uses TCO as well and that works fine with LLVM 2.8, both with the JIT and with statically compiled code, at least on x86_64. -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics,

Hi, Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue. My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via 514/udp, however I'm not receiving anything. I did the following on CentOS *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* In another session on the same server: *nc syslog-server -u 514* tcpdump started to show me messages like: *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG,

I just upgraded HLVM from LLVM 2.7 to 2.8 and started seeing stack overflows so I think TCO isn't working. Have there been any obvious changes that would cause this? -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com

hello, All, I runa webradio on Icecast and Shoutcast also, but got many compaints of listeners who tell me that they can't listen to the broadcasts on Icecast, because, SOMETIMES, although they already installed Winamp5, when they click on the link, Windows Media player, or Worst: PowerDVD is trying to open the ogg file. Any tips ?? And I'd like to know if there's any Embedded player

On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> wrote: > Jon Harrop wrote: >> I've come up with the following minimal repro that segfaults on my machine: > > Jon, were you able to resolve this? > > FWIW, TOT is causing all kinds of weird segfaults related to tail calls > in my Pure interpreter, too (at least on x86-64). In my case these

My compiler is generating a bunch of code including the following line: %57 = call fastcc i32 @aux(%1* %0, %1 %1, %1 %46, i32 0, %4 %2) ; <i32> [#uses=1] ret i32 %57 The program works fine as long as this isn't a tail call. If I compile via a .ll and insert "tail" by hand, the program segfaults. However, if I make it a tail call and return an undef i8* or void instead

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Georges Martin <jrjsmrtn at gmail.com> wrote: > A good practice is to have at least 2 DCs in a domain. > > > Yes, I'm aware of that and I try to adhere where possible. However, I'm supporting many smaller offices where 2 bare metal servers just wouldn't be acceptable in terms of TCO but an AD is still appreciated. So at the most I could