similar to: need to check and read ntfs acls from nfs stack, looking for libraries to do so

> Hello, > > I'm trying to resolve SID from a linux using a program written in c# > running under mono. > > I already know the Windows API LookupSID ( > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-lookupaccountsida) > and its underlying raw RPC call ( >

Vincent Le Toux via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > Indeed, rpcclient is the program I looked for the first time. > > I cannot invoke it in a command line because I have at least 1000 SID to > resolve > (I discover them one by one so I'll have to run rpcclient at least 1000 > times) You can pass multiples SID at a time to these commands. But you would have

This issue is reproducible for this customer and a couple of others. We execute the smbclient command the same way for each instance. The null user name is valid syntax sent from the smbclient. When we send the command " smbclient -c 'cd <dir>; ls' ", samba code executes starting with Negotiate Protocol Request, and onward. I'm guessing this could be a DFS issue, but

Good Day, We use a lot of DFS Shares (Windows) across our Linux Servers. The DFS Shares are setup in a Cluster. Over the weekend we did a DR excercise which included shutting down one of the Servers that hosted the DFS Shares. What we found is that any Linux Server that had associated itself with the DFS Server that was shutdown did not try and connect to the remaining Server that was up. Is

Good Day, We experience the following when we have outages or perform disaster recovery exercises. Our DFS Shares come from a Windows cluster with 2 servers, each one in a different location. When the server that we have active connections to goes offline, the server has an issue connecting to the second server. This even happens under a controlled shutdown and startup situation. If we

I am wondering if anyone has had a chance to look at bug 12518? This is the context of the message: Wireshark trace gives a STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER when running smbclient -c 'cd <dir>;ls' as a standalone program. This is a customer issue. We cannot recreate this issue so we're looking for why this may be happening. From the trace you'll see multiple sessions with

(Let's keep this on the list) Aurélien Aptel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > Chad William Seys <cwseys at physics.wisc.edu> writes: >> Somehow the destination having 'msdfsroot yes' prevents the cifs kernel >> module from following the link. I've taken a look at your traces and right off the bat I see things like this: [...]

Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > I have no idea just what you are hoping to achieve, but it is seemingly > possible without authentication as 'wbinfo -n ACCOUNT_NAME' returns the > accounts SID. So try looking at the wbinfo code. wbinfo is talking to winbind which itself is talking to the AD. In this scenario the client previously joined

"Tompkins, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > I'm wondering if anyone else has any feedback on this or needs anymore info ? Can you provide the output of the failing command with full debug messages (-d10)? -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg,

Hi Aurélien, is there some documentation around where I can read about that? Where can I find the information, that I need Kernel 4.11 or above to get DFS with SMB2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 and above working? Regards, Christian Am 12.06.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Aurélien Aptel: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> a few days ago we

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Dale Schroeder < dale at briannassaladdressing.com> wrote: > > > Try the "vers=3.0" option. That's what fixed mine. > > I suspect my old version of cifs-utils doesn't understand that option. Note the output says "vers=3.0,ver=1": mount.cifs --verbose //192.168.254.35/projects /mnt/smb -o

On 9/24/20 1:06 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > OK, you are using users & groups in the 1000-29999 range, why ? could > it be that you have the same users in /etc/passwd and AD ? On my Linux installs, I allow for a 'local' account with user id 1000. That is the only local account and is used for installing the OS (or in case AD is down). All other user/group accounts are

Thanks Aur?lien Can you point to me how I can start LDAP connection using winbind ? I'm using ldap_simple_bind so far so there is no use of winbind in it. I'll be happy also if you can point me to the winbind API where you can input login / password br Vincent Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 ? 11:37, Aur?lien Aptel <aaptel at suse.com> a ?crit : > Hi Vincent, > > If you want to

> Which smb version are you using (mount option)? Support for DFS on smb2+ > was only added in linux 4.11. smbstatus shows the connection as NT1. DFS links do work like this: serverA_msdfsrootYES => serverB_msdfsrootNO But not like this: serverA_msdfsrootYES => serverB_msdfsrootYES Somehow the destination having 'msdfsroot yes' prevents the cifs kernel module from

Hi I recently started to look into Samba source code and SMB protocol . I saw that SMBv3 has an compression feature but I couldnt find any source code related to it. I tried sending compression_capabilities in negotiate request packet but there was no correspoding response. Isn't feature implemented yet? If not when are you planning to implement it? Thanks

Re-sending with right email... msdfs root is set to "no" by default and is per-share. [myshare] msdfs root = no path = ... Should do the trick. Otherwise if mounting on linux you can also use the 'nodfs' mount option (mount.cifs //host/share/... /mnt/ -o ...,nodfs) to disable DFS resolving and automatic sub-mounting. Chad W Seys <cwseys at

Hi, Is there a place where I can specify defaults options a for "mount -t cifs"? I would like to change the default protocol version to vers=2.1 Is there something like a cifs.conf or such...? MJ

On 9/24/20 8:53 AM, Aur?lien Aptel wrote: > Ken Bass via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> I installed a new Ubuntu 20.4 LTS system (smbd 4.11.6) . Initially I >> tried using the SSSD and 'realm' to join the domain. Everything worked >> similar to my Centos 7 install and I thought I was finished. >> >> The one thing not working is? cifs

On 25/09/2020 10:14, Aur?lien Aptel via samba wrote: > Ken Bass via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> Can you please expand on this, I am confused as to what you are >> suggesting.? If 'getent pass' works properly and shows no >> overlap/confusion, this seems to be related to cifsacl. > It's still hard to say at this point. > > cifs.idmap

On 9/24/20 8:53 AM, Aur?lien Aptel wrote: > Ken Bass via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> I installed a new Ubuntu 20.4 LTS system (smbd 4.11.6) . Initially I >> tried using the SSSD and 'realm' to join the domain. Everything worked >> similar to my Centos 7 install and I thought I was finished. >> >> The one thing not working is? cifs