similar to: /configure.developer is not working

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "/configure.developer is not working"

2019 Sep 26
2
/configure.developer is not working
After I downloaded to samba-4.11.0 I am following to installation method below; wget -c https://download.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/samba-4.11.0.tar.gz tar -zxvf samba-4.11.0.tar.gz cd samba-4.11.0 ./configure.developer (1st error) Make (It now returns "Project not configured (run 'waf configure' first)" make install.. Using Centos 7 and samba-4.11.0 I guess there are alot of
2023 Jun 23
1
Rocky linux 9 - Samba AD
Hi Nico, that's amazing! Let me digest it because I am not sure if I can perform the installation properly. I will get back to you once done. Thanks very much, Metin Mobile! ________________________________ From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2023 1:03:52 PM To: Metin Koc <metkoc at outlook.com> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at
2016 Dec 15
3
Redhat Dependencies
Centos and redhat repositories are not the same. Also I tried epel already. They may change the names of the related packages so I ll ask to redhat team ASAP. Actually I'm testing it out so I have no hurry. I ll let you know guys mobile! 15 Ara 2016 ÖS 9:49 tarihinde "Vinicius Lehmann via samba" < samba at lists.samba.org> yazdı: > Hi, > > Execute* yum install
2016 Dec 09
3
Additional DC (backup domain controller)
Hi all I want to add another DC for high availability. Samba dc is running on centos7 samba version is 4.5.1. Currently I'm managing to samba dc with rsat. Just want if the domain controller fails than another dc is still running with the same dc information (especially users, GPO, dns) Can someone please guide me how to do that?
2017 Aug 17
4
Samba 4.7rc4. (Debian Stretch Amd64 packages/sources available)
Hai,   Can anyone ( one of the devs)  tell if its safe for a samba 4.7rc4 to join and samba 4.6(.7) AD DC domain. Any do/donts, im asking so i can test a DC join, but i want to test in my production even, since that are the best tests. First test of a clean ADDC install looks ok.   Aand yes, i have already made 3 backups of the DC's, already when i go testing.  i can restore quickly.   ;-)
2023 Jun 22
1
Rocky linux 9 - Samba AD
Hello everyone, I am looking dependency list to install Samba AD on Rocky Linux 9 but have yet to find any information. I found some useful articles for version 8 however, started to believe it's neither ready for Rocky Linux 9 nor other derivatives. Wondering it's true or is there any solution for it. Many thanks in advance. Best, Metin
2020 Mar 31
3
Samba 4.10 / CentOS 7
Hi, I intend to upgrade our Samba AD DC from 4.9 to 4.10 on a CentOS 7 server . On the Wiki page : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Manually_maintained_Distribution-specific_Package_lists <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba> the yum command that lists all needed packages includes python3 for RHEL 8 /
2016 Dec 15
2
Redhat Dependencies
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > Am 15.12.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Metin Koc via samba: >> Centos and redhat repositories are not the same. Also I tried epel >> already. > > EPEL == EPEL > period There is only one EPEL repo, but what does vary between CentOS and Redhat is the installation method for EPEL:
2020 Mar 31
3
Samba 4.10 / CentOS 7
Ok Thank you Andrew So I assume it is reasonable to install all packages listed for the CentOS8 in a CentOS7 server , I already have EPEL repo configured. Our Samba 4.9 AD DC is source compiled and I would like to upgrade by compiling and installing 4.10 . So my other question is : is it possible to have python3 and python2 live together on the same server ? Thanks Le mar. 31 mars 2020 ?
2019 Apr 11
3
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:43 AM Gabriel O. Franca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Good morning people, > > I am opening my lab with version 4.10.2 in centos 7.6. > I'm trying to compile using python3 without success. > Has anyone managed to compile using python3 in the centos 7.6 that might > give way to the stones? > Here is the error message
2019 Dec 17
2
Python 2 compatibility for utility scripts
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:41 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> > wrote: > >> It sounds like you ran into a bug in the test infrastructure's code to >> determine if python3 is supported. Fixing that might be harder, but it only >> needs to be fixed once no matter how
2019 Dec 02
4
Debian Stretch - > buster: samba packages
On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >> Hai, >> >> Sorry for the late reply. > Never mind, weekend is important ... > >> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge >> Without the autoremove libldb1 is not removed so libldb2 can be installed. > # apt-get distupgrade
2020 Apr 02
2
Samba 4.12 python3 and vfs object full_audit (centos7)
Hallo, I?m using samba 4.11 from sernet and the vfs object full_audit. After update samba to 4.12 from sernet full_audit is broken and the shares with full_audit are not accessible. Can anyone tell me please how to install python 3 on centos7 while the Centos system needs python 2 but samba sould use python3? Thanks in advance, Peter
2011 Jan 11
1
Samba4 with python2.7 and python3
Hi all, Arch Linux (a rolling release distro) has updated to python3 a while back. python2 is still installed in parallel, but part of the ramifications of this move is the following:-0 1. /usr/bin/python points to /usr/bin/python3 instead of /usr/bin/python2 2. /usr/bin/python-config points to /usr/bin/python3-config instead of /usr/bin/python2-config I'm having problems with make for
2020 Oct 13
2
[RFC] Python 2 / Python 3 status, final step(s)
Hi Folks, Now that LLVM 11.0.0 has been released, it's time to prepare for the final step envisionned in the previous RFC named *[RFC] Python 2 / Python 3 status* [0], ie. requiring Python3.6 for LLVM 12.0.0, to be released in 2021. At least Fedora already only ships Python3 and we didn't have much bugs reported wrt. Python compatibility for the LLVM toolchain. Indeed, all Python scripts
2014 Dec 15
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Requiring python 2.6
On 14 December 2014 at 20:50, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote: > Just a reminder, these bots are still not operational because of this > change. Well, there were valid objections to lowering the requirement. If we can require the host compiler to be upgraded, it is probably ok to require python to be upgraded too, no? Cheers, Rafael
2019 Apr 15
4
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 10:38 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:43 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba > > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >
2016 Dec 13
8
Redhat Dependencies
Hi there I'm giving this error when i'm provisioning the new domain with redhat 7. By the way 3 of dependencies doesn't exist https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba# Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_.2F_CentOS_.2F_Scientific_Linux 1. No package perl-Parse-Yapp available. 2. No package perl-Test-Base available. 3. No package python-crypto
2020 Feb 28
2
Issue compiling Samba 4.11.6 with GNUTLS 3.6.12 (Not standard location)
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 18:38 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > Is there a way to solve this build issue with Samba 4.11.6? > > > Not sure, but even if you can, you cannot use it without python3 > > Rowland G'Day Rowland, If the OS only needs to build Samba for a fileserver or a client library then the python3 issue doesn't come up, we still allow a build of
2016 Feb 24
4
Can lit be upgraded to assume Python 2.7?
On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" > nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the > buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are > mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots