similar to: Repacking database from v1 to v2 format: how long does it take?

On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> hi all, >> >> I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the >> database >> conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. >> >> On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the >>

On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 11:44 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba > > wrote: > > > hi all, > > > > > > I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the > > > database > > > conversion from v1 to v2

On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > hi all, > > I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the > database > conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. > > On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the > sudo ./bin/samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix > takes ~40 minutes, 2 hours

Hello list, I try to repack(tdbtool repack) my "dc=domain,dc=com.ldb" file: tdb> info Size of file/data: 3388084000/1050098055 Header offset/logical size: 0/3388084000 Number of records: 669737 Incompatible hash: no Active/supported feature flags: 0x00000000/0x00000001 Robust mutexes locking: no Smallest/average/largest keys: 12/57/242 Smallest/average/largest data: 72/1510/1235987

Hi everyone, samba-tool dbcheck --reindex Re-indexing... ../ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:2352: duplicate attribute value in CN=WSTEST,OU=vm,OU=computers,OU=test,DC=ad,DC=test,DC=it for index on servicePrincipalName, duplicate of objectGUID 4c723426-73f8-4991-bf95-88eb57840c2c in @INDEX:SERVICEPRINCIPALNAME:TERMSRV/WSTEST.AD.TEST.IT Looking at the computer entry, I indeed have thoses two SPN (notice

In addition to Rowland comment. if you still able to test it. Remove 1 setting at a time, restart and test it. Start with these, in this order. logging = syslog only prefork children = 8 I think if the logging line is removed your problem is solved. man smb.conf /logging should explain more. Because I cant/find the setting : logging = syslog only Greetz, Louis

Hello Cristian, Well, nothing to say about your steps, these looks good. And lmdb could be disable in the sernet packages, cant say, i dont know. And only one DC has these problems or all? If only one DC crashed. Which DC crashes. Last added? Oldest? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Christian

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:41:54 +0100 miguel medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello > > In one of my DCs, when I run ./configure for Samba 4.9.0, it fails > with the following message: > > Checking for lmdb >= 0.9.16 via header check : not > found Samba AD DC and --enable-selftest requires lmdb 0.9.16 or later > > My ./configure command

After a mail mentionning that i cannot run the sambaundoguidindex, here the error i'm getting : root at samba:~/samba-4.8.2/source4/scripting/bin# killall samba root at samba:~/samba-4.8.2/source4/scripting/bin# ./sambaundoguididx Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sambaundoguididx", line 54, in <module> samdb.modify(modmsg) _ldb.LdbError: (32, 'ldb_wait

I found this thread from a few months ago that seems to have been started by someone with the same problem I have, but it was not resolved: https://www.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2005-March/msg00000.html I have been trying to speed up my boot times and I notice that a lot of time is spent waiting on IO. Even with readahead-list precacheing files, it is reading at less than 1/4 of my

Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 6:54 PM Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > FYI to everyone: If you have things that you would like to see done > before a merge of Flang, please reply with as many details as you have > time to provide (and if you have things that you would like to see done > soon, but you're comfortable with them happening after

Appdb entry (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=8352) I'm trying to get all my games to run under linux, but of cause a few are giving me problems, and Pathologic is one of the few that really bothers me. As far as I can tell, the game uses DirectX9, Windows Media format (cinematics), and OpenAL. Of the three, the WMF dependency is the most annoying, as it

Hi , you need to install these packages(epel repo enabled): yum install attr bind-utils docbook-style-xsl gcc gdb krb5-workstation \ libsemanage-python libxslt perl perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker lmdb-devel libarchive-devel \ perl-Parse-Yapp perl-Test-Base pkgconfig policycoreutils-python pygpgme \ python2-crypto gnutls-devel gpgme-devel jansson-devel libattr-devel keyutils-libs-devel \ libacl-devel

On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 15:53 +0200, Andrej Gessel via samba wrote: > Hello list, > > I try to repack(tdbtool repack) my "dc=domain,dc=com.ldb" file: > > tdb> info > Size of file/data: 3388084000/1050098055 > Header offset/logical size: 0/3388084000 > Number of records: 669737 > Incompatible hash: no > Active/supported feature flags: 0x00000000/0x00000001

hi all, I can't figure out why winbind can't find ad users with wbinfo calls. It happens on a member server, Debian GNU/Linux stretch, samba is 4.7.5 from Louis repository: [global] security = ADS workgroup = EXAMPLEAD realm = EXAMPLE.ORG idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 1000000-3000000 idmap config EXAMPLEAD:backend = ad idmap config

Il 04/09/18 06:00, Volker Lendecke ha scritto: > Hi! > > Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a > performance problem with gencache. > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations >> joined. >>

I used the DC rejoin method as described in the WiKi to upgrade one of my DCs to version 4.11.0. Following the steps, when I came to rejoin the domain, it initially failed, complaining that the DC already existed, but to force the rejoin, remove the files: secrets.ldb and secrets.tdb. I assume you don't demote the DC before the upgrade, as there's no mention of this? Anyway, I

>> Did you specify --without-ldb-ldmb? Nope. I didn't specify "–enable-selftest" either. The default for this option being "no", why does "configure" stop after complaining that "–enable-selftest" requires lmdb? Maybe I'm just being stupid... It happens.

Sorry for the long post but attempted this several over the past year with no success but staying on an NT4 domain is no longer viable. Need to get this resolved so hopefully there will be a clue somewhere in this montage. The current PDC is samba-3.6.25 running on Gentoo using tdbsam backend. The new AD will be a Debian LXC container running on Debian Jessie using samba compiled from git

> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:12:32 +0100 > Francesco Malvezzi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> dear experts, >> >> I would like to setup idmap config ad. I have already the uidNumber >> attribute populated on AD. >> >> But there is something very basic wrong with my config: > > Yes, there is something wrong ;-) > See below