similar to: Samba 4.10 AD DS test lab with DNS

Hello All, I hope someone might be able to assist me. Env: RHEL 7 Samba 4.10 Bind9 DLZ 9.4 I have tried everything to disable 'DNS Zone Transfers' when using Bind9 DLZ with Samba ADDC. I'm using below line , and I have tried different acl's as well, but nothing seems to work. allow-transfer {"none";}; Can someone please advise on how to disable 'DNS Zone

Sure it was, ;-), maybe not that one specific site link but it was on wiki and my google searches do show that.. Im always wondering what people used for there searches. When they can find it. I also noticed on the link: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End Verify that your /etc/krb5.conf Kerberos client configuration file is readable by your BIND user. For example: # ls

Thanks Roland, You are correct. Our Bind9 DLZ is version 9.9.4. I'll have to check if I will be able to upgrade to a newer version of Bind, these are on our production servers. On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:40 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 22/07/2019 08:24, Eben Victor via samba wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I hope someone might be

Hi, While upgrading samba 4.4 to samba 4.10 I have detected taht with newer versions if you use bind-dlx config it seem that is not working by a permissions problems on new folder bind-dns on samba folder, If you change to 777 to this folder and named.conf then works, but is not secure... I have checked samba wiki and no information about this Any suggestion what could be the right

I do : ) 2016-03-03 10:52 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 03/03/16 09:31, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Thank you Mark for these precisions. >> >> I did switch a DC to --dns-backend=NONE using samba-tool domain join. This >> removed dns-<DCname> user for this DC and associated keytab. >> >> We

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think most people here use BIND as their DNS server of choise. I just happen to have updated DLZ patch for the current bind version. DLZ patch allows you to use mysql (pgsql, ldap etc) as a backend for zone storage. I make no garantees, of course, but if anyone is interested on the patch (with or without the specfile for rpm building), please let

Hi all, Thank you Mark for these precisions. I did switch a DC to --dns-backend=NONE using samba-tool domain join. This removed dns-<DCname> user for this DC and associated keytab. We changed /etc/resolv.conf to use another DC - one with Bind running - as nameserver. Stopping there, running samba_dnsupdate gave error "NOTAUTH". As we want our DC being able to push into DNS

Op 14-10-2024 om 16:31 schreef John R. Graham via samba: > On 10/14/24 10:23, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> If you use Bind on the DC with bind-dlz to interface with Samba, you >> can choose where to put the example.com zone. You can put it in AD >> with samba-tool (as you did now) but you can also decide to host it >> in Bind directly (in

I was wondering if I can implement slave DNS servers for a samba domain. I would like to setup a slave section on my bind server that gets its information from my samba-ad dns server? Or is my only option at the moment to use bind-dlz with bind on my samba-dc? This page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration says zone transfers is unimplemented but one of the links on there

Hello lovely samba-people, this morning all of our DCs (debian bookworm) upgraded their bind9 packages to 9.18.28 (from 9.18.24). Afterwards the named service would not come up successfully and crash after loading the DLZ: Jul 26 07:32:12 rad-1.ad.ellerhold.lan named[1903]: sizing zone task pool based on 64 zones Jul 26 07:32:12 rad-1.ad.ellerhold.lan named[1903]: Loading 'AD DNS

> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:38:58 +0200 Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello lovely samba-people, > > this morning all of our DCs (debian bookworm) upgraded their bind9 > packages to 9.18.28 (from 9.18.24). Afterwards the named service > would not come up successfully and crash after loading the DLZ: > > Jul 26

Can work if you use provisioning with BIND9_FLATFILE anyway i tested that long time ago.. but then you wil be missing the "Multimaster" dns ability. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2015 11:10 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org

On 10/14/24 10:23, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > If you use Bind on the DC with bind-dlz to interface with Samba, you > can choose where to put the example.com zone. You can put it in AD > with samba-tool (as you did now) but you can also decide to host it in > Bind directly (in /etc/bind/named.conf.local). Bind has all the > options you are looking for. You just have

zone "local.thisismycompany.com" { type slave; masters { *your DCs go here* }; file "/etc/bind/namedb/bak.local.thisismycompany.com"; forwarders{}; }; If you are setting up bind on the DC like that, you have a problem, you are not using DLZ. Rowland

Hello, on my Samba AD with BIND DLZ backend it looks like Reverse Updates did not work. dig winclient.example.com resolve an IP dig -x IP does not resolve the hostname In the bind log I see client 192.168.30.148#57598: update 'example.com/IN' denied my named.conf // This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named. // // Please read

Hi All, 1) I read that the devs are working on supporting AD 2012 in 4.11, very cool. 2) I read SAMBA 4.11 can support 100,000 users and 120,000 computers, very cool. It appears that SAMBA is moving to be a viable file server, authentication and authorization server that can replace Microsoft Active Directory - Directory Services. Is this possible before 2030 for business with multiple sites

Hello ! I am the network administrator of a French high school. I have already configured a BIND9 server with dynamic DNS update from the ISC DHCP server for my zone : lyc-guillaume-fichet.ac-grenoble.fr And I would like to add a samba4 server in this zone. How can I add the samba's DNS entries to this existing zone keeping my previous static and dynamic entries ? I can't use directly

hello our AD domain is hosted by two samba AD domain controllers version 4.12.6 - replication between controllers is fine, no problems. - no schema errors. - no database errors, all fine. we use this samba DCs with bind with DLZ backend (bind-9.11.13-6.el8_2.1.x86_64) to manage internal DNS zones. bind/DLZ setup is deployed completely same way on both DC1 and DC2 (mostly followed samba wiki

On 27/08/15 22:00, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided one... > > I suppose I will have to find what schemas, particularly if the bind > dlz schema is included? ER, you don't actually need to add any extra schemas, it is all built into samba4 when run as an AD DC, if you are struggling to understand this, just think a