similar to: Deprecation of NONE DNS backend

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:57 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/08/2019 19:49, Andy Strohman via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm curious about this remark on the wiki[1] : > > "do NOT use NONE as the DNS backend, it is not supported and will be > > removed in a future Samba version." > > > >

On 28/08/2019 19:49, Andy Strohman via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I'm curious about this remark on the wiki[1] : > "do NOT use NONE as the DNS backend, it is not supported and will be > removed in a future Samba version." > > Why is this being removed? > > I would prefer to manually add the records that would be generated by > BIND9_FLATFILE to my

I am planning up upgrading my AD/DC from Samba version 4.8.2 to the most recent version in my Slackware distro which is currently 4.15.13. In previous threads in this maillist I was advised that the best route to achieve this was to add a 2nd domain controller, then promote that one and demote the original. I'm in the process of setting up a 2nd DC to that end. I thought I ask questions as I

Hi! Have you read? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Preparing_the_Host_for_Joining_the_Domain Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu no dia domingo, 16/07/2023 ?(s) 07:23: > I am planning up upgrading my AD/DC from Samba version 4.8.2 to the most > recent > version in my Slackware distro which is currently

Am 18.07.2018 um 14:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:49:39 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hmm, your REALM is 'SMBDOMAIN.FILE.DUCK' but your dnsdomain appears to > be just 'duck' > > Rowland > I read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ - but I am not sure that my

On 05/08/2019 09:55, Patrik via samba wrote: > the dig is wrong as well, it adds an additional ip address, which i have > not request to use other interfaces: > root at server:/# dig p3x-dc.patrikx3.com > Patrik, I have told you what your problem is, refusing to accept that you have setup Bind9 incorrectly is no reason for opening a new thread. Just in case you missed it, or

On 28/01/2023 06:44, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > I wrote earlier about setting the domain user password minimum to > 14 > characters. It was advised that my first step should be to upgrade from Samba > 4.8.2 to the most recent version available which for my Slackware 15.0 distro is > 4.15.5. This also involved a distro upgrade from Slackware 14.2 to 15.0. > > After

Il giorno mar 17 dic 2019 alle ore 17:49 Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> ha scritto: In the last year this has come up a few times, try reading this > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/817470/how-to-reconfigure-an-msdcs-subdomain-to-a-forest-wide-dns-application > It looks like we need a tool to correct AD :-( > Thanks! I will read that article. Do

On Sat Jan 28 02:37:16 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/01/2023 06:44, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > I wrote earlier about setting the domain user password minimum to > 14 > > characters. It was advised that my first step should be to upgrade from Samba > > 4.8.2 to the most recent version available which for my Slackware 15.0

Hi Guys, Setup: Versions: Samba: 4.6.7 Bind9: 9.10.3 Firewall disabled AD Provision: Migrated from samba 3 to 4 using classic upgrade. samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba.PDC/dbdir --realm=TEST.LOCAL --dns-backend=BIND9_FLATFILE /etc/samba.PDC/smb.PDC.conf The following was the section in regards to the upgrade Processing section

Am 19.07.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:21:41 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 18.07.2018 um 14:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> > It is touched on here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Parameter_Explanation >

> > I have been doing a bit of investigation and I 'think' we do have a tool > ;-) > Gooooooooddd!! :-) > If you examine 'samba_upgradedns', at the top it says this: > # Upgrade DNS provision from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL > I think if you use it to upgrade to either BIND_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL, > it should create the required AD

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:52:46 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Given no responses on this question for a few days, I'm concluding > that we're out of ideas on this problem. Let me propose a couple of > ideas. Apparently, the basic Windows FOLDER and SHARE permissions > are correct according to Louis' recommendations (see message below).

Hallo, We have Samba4 (Sernet, Version4.1) on a Debian Wheezy server. There we try to use our Infoblox (It is our primary and secondary DNS server) as an external DNS server for the active directory on the samba4 server. It doesn?t matter which setup option (Samba_internal, bind_dlz, none) we use it doesn?t work. Harry

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2

Hai, ? i was reading: ? http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Testing_DNS? which stats : Don't use BIND9_FLATFILE! It's not documented and supported!? ? This is wrong imo.? ? bind9_flatefile works fine, it just does not support multi master dns, and bind9_DLZ does. so you must setup a master/slave setup for bind9 with flatfile ? If you need to run a network with

Hello, I need help you to understand my error. I have juste generate samba ad with the following command samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm:? SAMBADOM.CALAIS.FR Domain [SAMBADOM]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]:? dc DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]:? SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none'

Hi Team, Samba Version = 4.2 Bind = 9.10 with dlz Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) [root at dc2]# samba-tool drs showrepl (want to highlight the name which is using to connect) ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DRS connection to *dc2.ik.lan.mum* failed - drsException: DRS connection to dc2.ik.lan.mum failed: (-1073741772, 'The

Hi, I'm still running samba4 beta5 with dns-backend=BIND9_FLATFILE I want to upgrade to samba4 rc5. Can I still use BIND9_FLATFILE ? Best regards, Bruno Fernandes

I really do not know what to do so that GPOs can be created, I have tried all the possible solutions that have been sent to me but without success.