similar to: Samba 4.10.7 and 4.9.12 for rhel7/centos7 rpms

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.8 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). These rpms use the default python2 from the system. The 4.10.x SPEC file is now more closely aligned with upstream (Fedora SPEC file) and I've yet to test these builds using the system's python3 on RHEL7.

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.3

On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:09 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.10 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 How do you build this on

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.8.11 that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 If you're on RHEL7/Centos7, you've got several repos to choose from: http://azzurro.ezplanet.net/el7

On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 > > ? > > Hi Sergio, > that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls- >

Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) Hi Sergio, I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 might be needed: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). Regards, Vincent On Mon, 8

Hi Garming, Thanks for taking the time to enlighten me. I do happen to have two DC's and in my limited testing, 4.10.2 seems to function properly as an AD/DC on el7.6 with the packages I built. As I'm not using those DC's for file serving in a clustered setup, it is also my interpretation that I can do without ctdb (this one had a specific requirement for a higher version of a

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 06:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle > > > 3.2 >

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 10:55 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.11 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 > > If you're

On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: >> http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 ? Hi Sergio, that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls-3.3.39 and nettle-2.7.1: [root at dc02 ~]# rpm -q nettle gnutls nettle-2.7.1-8.el7.x86_64 nettle-2.7.1-8.el7.i686

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.10/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.9.10) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719824 ,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-, Vincent S. Cojot, Computer Engineering. STEP project. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Comite Micro-Informatique. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,. Linux Xview/OpenLook resources page

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and ldb-1.5.5. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

Hi Andrew, Hi Rowland, I just spent close to one hour debugging this with one OpenShift specialist from RedHat. What we figured was: 1) both of my configs work (auth and group-sync) and are in fact correct. 2) OCP group sync does not sync the groups that have no explicit 'member' Attribute or groups that are 'default' groups (E.g: 'Domain Users') where membership is

Hi Konstantin, On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 7/11/19 8:59 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> Thank you for the diff. I will review it and merge it today. >> About the missing directories, I think it may be doable to add them to the >> 'ctdb' rpm. As I'm not using ctdb, what should the ownership/permissions >> be for those

Hi everyone, I searched previous postings and I couldn't find a definitive answer on this.. I run a small lab of RHEL/Centos Based servers on which there's VMWare Workstation running on a non-standard port but still manageable by tools like VMrun (and the Fusion of Workstation GUI, of course). I'm trying to use virsh with this setup and getting the following error from both

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). These rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.12.5

Hi All, I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :) I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat). I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7. (this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake) but... building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows