similar to: interference of the nmbd service with the dhcp of the debian server??

Thanks for your feedback Rowland!!! I am eliminating the possibilities! :D On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:57 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 19/08/2019 14:41, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello guys, > > > > I have a fileserver configured on a debian 9.9 using Louis APT. This is > not > > always the case, but sometimes the

On 19/08/2019 14:41, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > Hello guys, > > I have a fileserver configured on a debian 9.9 using Louis APT. This is not > always the case, but sometimes the server changes IP, and the configuration > in /etc/network/interfaces is static. I already disabled services that > could potentially change the IP. > > - The server is an xenserver VM; > -

> > Just a thought, is dhcpcd5 installed ? No. Does this happen on the XEN Server of Client (guest OS). If Xen, which xen version? xen 7.0.0 The command cat lan-dev-$(ip route | grep default |awk '{ print $5 }').network shows nothing. Do I need to create this file? His content is just my interface. Ex: eth0? On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:54 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.

root at fileserver:~# getfacl /home/dados/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: home/dados/ # owner: root # group: domain\040admins user::rwx group::rwx other::--- Still with the same problem. No security tab on windows machine. :( The "Administrator" and "Domain Admins" also need to have an unix attribute? On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:08 PM,

Hello Louis, I use your apt for samba. Great works btw!! :D root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V Version 4.7.3-Debian root at dc3:/etc/samba# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.2 (stretch) Release: 9.2 Codename: stretch Did you upgrade, if so, from .. To ... Samba version ? No upgrades. And why was running : samba-tool ntacl

hi folks, After run *samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset *the below error occurs. I not remember of make any modification directly on the server. I only manager via rsat. root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset *open: error=40 (Too many levels of symbolic links)* ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823, '{Operation Failed} The requested operation was unsuccessful.')

The principle was not made any changes to occur this problem. We infra have dc3 and dc4 ADDC. root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V Version 4.7.7-Debian (van-blle apt) Result of gpupdate /force in a joined computer client: C:\>gpupdate /force > Updating Policy... > User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were > encountered: > The processing of Group Policy

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 14:21 -0300, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello?Andrew, > > 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is > set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but > when it is at the default log level, it does? I don't have an explanation for this, sorry. ?Have you looked into the 1.5 second queries, what is sending them and

> > If you run getent passwd administrator on a DC, you should get > something like this: > root at dc1:~# getent passwd administrator > SAMDOM\administrator:*:0:10000::/home/administrator:/bin/bash On my DC getent passwd administrator show nothing. :( Is it necessary to map the root user to ADDC as well? There is however a gotcha, on any domain > joined windows machine there

Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira

Hello Morillo, I have reviewed the steps described again. In fact, I had already done this several times. :D Even so, it does not map. The shared folder is mapped, but the printer is not. On windows 7 it works correctly. On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM MORILLO Jordi via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Printing is working well for us. > Carrefully

On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another

1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5