similar to: Samba related question??

Windows 10? Then this is normal behaivor. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: maandag 12 augustus 2019 15:50 > Aan: sambalist > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Windows cannot access \\server check > the spelling of the name 0x800704cf > > On 12/08/2019 14:18, Rich Webb wrote:

Kirtland Air Force Base has denied approval for the use of R on its Windows network. Some of their objections seem a bit strange, but some appear to be legitimate. In particular, they have detected registry "vulnerabilities" which are detailed in the attachment. I know nothing about Windows registry vulnerabilities. If any of these issues are legitimate concerns,

Riello Netman Plus 102 Card plugged into a Riello Sentinel SDL 6000-7 and a Riello Sentinel Dual SDH 1000-7 upsc RielloSentinelSDL6000 battery.charge: 100.0 battery.current: 0.0 battery.runtime: 16560.0 battery.runtime.low: 3 battery.voltage: 217.7 driver.name: snmp-ups driver.parameter.mibs: ietf driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: 10.20.30.39 driver.version: 2.2.2

Riello Netman Plus 102 Card plugged into a Riello Sentinel SDL 6000-7 and a Riello Sentinel Dual SDH 1000-7 upsc RielloSentinelSDL6000 battery.charge: 100.0 battery.current: 0.0 battery.runtime: 16560.0 battery.runtime.low: 3 battery.voltage: 217.7 driver.name: snmp-ups driver.parameter.mibs: ietf driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: 10.20.30.39 driver.version: 2.2.2

I've contacted Riello and they told me that the NetMan 204 is the new version of the Netman Plus 102 and is indeed compatible with NUT. I don't know how to update the Hardware compatibility list page, but the 204 should be added to the compatible ones. Niccolo' Il 2022-06-17 12:02 Niccol? Belli via Nut-upsuser ha scritto: > Hi, > I'm looking for a small 230V Line

I've contacted Riello and they told me that the NetMan 204 is the new version of the Netman Plus 102 and is indeed compatible with NUT. I don't know how to update the Hardware compatibility list page, but the 204 should be added to the compatible ones. Niccolo' Il 2022-06-17 12:02 Niccol? Belli via Nut-upsuser ha scritto: > Hi, > I'm looking for a small 230V Line

Hi, I'm looking for a small 230V Line Interactive Pure Sine Wave UPS with NUT support via network. It looks like the VST1100 has a communication slot for an optional NetMan 204 network card, but I couldn't figure out if that would be compatible with NUT. What I need is being able to monitor the UPS in Home Assistant (which uses NUT AFAIK) plus being able to automatically shut down a

hi I have samba version 2.2.6 running tru64 5.1A when I try to open printer or printer properties i take 2 to 3 minute does any one have an idea what's going on my samba configuration is thanks for help regads Alaa [global] workgroup = NETMAN server string = NetMan Office Server (samba v 2.2.6) netbios name = teapot netbios aliases = teapot adm

Yes, thank you for the guidance. Regarding "*You do not put the users password here (if that is what you are trying to do): --password=PASSWORD1*" My experience has been this, no matter where I put "--password=" in the string, after the "user" as the manpage suggests or the end. When I run the create string I am asked for a "New Password:' and then

On 03/06/15 22:04, ivenhov wrote: > Thanks Rowland. > I understand smb.conf is bit messy and can affect performance but it should > not prevent me from joining domain. > > Here you go: > > [global] > workgroup = MYNAT > realm = MYNAT.MYCO.BCU > server string = My server %h > security = ADS > password server =

Hai Bob, Always.. Pretty buzzy at the office atm, so thats why i have not much around, but i had a look. If everything is setup correctly. Using Group Policy Folder Redirection, is also the one i use and you should use. Are you using it like this. \\hostname.internal.domain.tld\users\%USERNAME%\Desktop If i look at this. ( on the wiki ) On the Settings tab: Unselect Grant the user

Dear Sirs, I'm Massimo Zampieri responsible for the software and connectivity accessories for Riello UPS. I would like to list our UPS to NUT. For this porpoise we will provide to you all the information requested as serial protocols, end even some ups in case. We have 2 way to communicate with our ups via RS232 and USB (with our driver, but the source code will be provided in case) and via

So, what is the difference between "Using Group Policy Folder Redirection" and "Using a Group Policy Preference"? Is it an either/or and _NOT both_ scenario? Clearly the ". . . Policy Preference" is editing the registry settings of each workstation with a GPO. Something the " . . . Policy Folder Redirection" does not do. Is not "Using a Group

As per title, is it possible to export GPO's from one AD DC and import them into another, one on a different domain? Searching online, all posts refer to transferring GPO's between servers on the same domain, or restoring GPO's from backups when rebuilding a server. It is tedious to configure by hand 30-40 GPO's - it would save a lot of time if there was a way to just copy

Hello Samba-List, Recently I ran into a few access rights problems with GPO's. I have an test environment running with four samba4 AD DC's (sernet 4.1.2/debian wheezy). Used the Script's from the samba wiki for sysvol replication. The AD Database is comming from an classic upgrade and i have "idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes" in my smb.conf. Some groups like for example

I'm running samba 4.1.6 as a PDC on ubuntu 14.04. I'm following these guides to setup print shares https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_as_a_print_server https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs When I go to my windows workstation to change the ACL's on the print$ share I can get into the security tab and I can change the security options

Hi I'd like to learn more on the pros and cons of a mixed domain that consists of both MS and Samba domain controllers and member servers. What I have learnt so far is this; I created a new lab domain with an MS DC 2019. I then added a Samba 4.19-3 file server as a domain member w/o any issues. The clients are 2 Win 10 VM's for tests of shares, GPO's and related technologies. Still

On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 11:34 +0100, Anders ?stling via samba wrote: > Hi > I'd like to learn more on the pros and cons of a mixed domain that > consists > of both MS and Samba domain controllers and member servers. This is a situation that is meant to work, but is not actively tested (all our tests are pure Samba), but seems to work for some folks. However given the way Windows

This is beacuse all workstations are windows, but we are thinking migrate to fedora. i already have all the users in samba DC. We access to internet and others apps with user from DC. because of that, we need both systems for now El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 18:23, Rowland Penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:57:26 -0300 > Carlos Bordon via

My main home server runs Fedora 25. I have experimented in the past with an Ubuntu samba AD domain controller(in a VM). Which was really cool because I could join Windows 10 pro machines to it and assign GPO's just like my AD at work. Currently I'm looking into setting up a FreeRadius server. I want to eventually be able to have the same authentication across machines and wifi and the lot.